What Hindu-Noahidism will look like for America, and it is time to coin the term "Judeo-Hindu"

 The more I listen to my interview with Narish, a right-wing Hindu (below) who says Hinduism is not idolatry, the more fear I have of Hindu subversion in the West. I realized something I never realized before.  According to many Hindus, Judaism's monotheism and its prohibition on god becoming material comes from Hinduism; that Jews are lost tribes from India. Jews reverse this and say that proto-Jewish tribes migrated to India, wrote the Noahide Vedas, then left and the natives turned it toward idolatry with statues, things like astrology, and inventing holidays (are there any holidays in the old Vedas?).

Talking to a right-wing Hindu about idolatry, polytheism, and Noahide Law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DgjVfoOlZI

Why is Hindu theology so disturbing and a threat to White civilization.  First, let's look at something from Mormonism.  Mormonism started out pretty much as a White religion.  The protagonists in the Book of Mormon are White while the antagonists are dark Natives.  For some time, under their doctrine of "blood atonement", a Mormon could be killed for marrying a black person.  Also, Blacks were not allowed to hold the priesthood until the 1970s.  There is something highly unusual about the Mormon version of god.  Here are a list of his qualities: 

The Mormon Concept of God

Although there is certainly disagreement among Mormon scholars concerning some precise points of doctrine, it is safe to say the LDS church currently teaches that God is, in effect, (1) a contingent being, who was at one time not God (not necessary and not eternally God); (2) limited in knowledge (not truly omniscient), power (not omnipotent), and being (not omnipresent or immutable); (3) one of many gods; (4) a corporeal (bodily) being, who physically dwells at a particular spatiotemporal location and is therefore not omnipresent like the biblical God (respecting His intrinsic divine nature-we are not considering the Incarnation of the Son of God here); and (5) a being who is subject to the laws and principles of a universe He did not create.

 https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/the-mormon-concept-of-god/#:~:text=Although%20there%20is%20certainly%20disagreement%20among%20Mormon%20scholars,principles%20of%20a%20universe%20He%20did%20not%20create.

This has no resemblance to mainstream Christianity, the idea that god is a human being with a real body is beyond the pale, and the idea that god is limited in knowledge and power is repugnant to most Christians.  Christians, like Jews and Hindus, want to believe god (but no Jesus who is also god) is outside time and space so he has unlimited powers. But Mormonism more resembles old White polytheism, god is limited so we can know the knowledge of god ourselves and we can become god, in this life or the next.  God being material and limited to the laws of the physical universe is a much more scientific form of theism than god being a magical being outside the universe, it is more logical to believe god is the physical universe and so the physical universe is uncreated. This science-mindedness and the desire to have a god who can be known rationally is the White way of religion in my opinion. Mormonism was obviously White atavism showing up in religion. 

Hinduism on the other hand is irrational, god cannot be perceived or understood and lives outside space and time, he is a mystery who created the universe through non-scientific means, he has "magic" powers that can break the laws of physics. Hinduism is based on irrationalism and mysticism, a bad worldview for Whites who depend on logic and reason. Hinduism asks us to focus on a nonsensical god and so we speak nonsense and eventually become nonsense. God in the White way can be discussed as matter and energy, the Hindu god cannot even really be discussed as he is unknowable. Even if Hindus say god is knowable, how can we with physical minds unite with him if he is not present in the material?  With a material god, we can unite with him in our physical bodies.  This is scientific gnosis rather than unscientific gnosis which is promoted by Hinduism. 

The White race became the leaders of science because we still had some of our old polytheism, also, Jesus is material and that is why Christians pray through Jesus, they can perceive him and know him by name; god became flesh and so therefore is understandable. This helped keep White people on a track of searching for meaning in the material.  A Hindu American would be a less rational and less scientific America and people would be contemplating mysteries rather than the laws of the universe.  Oswald Spengler, the prophet of Western decline, predicted that people would flee from technical knowledge into irrationalism.  Hindu thinking is not straightforward and so India is a pseudo-logical culture.  This would be disastrous for the West's physical prowess. Just because Hindus are good at science now does not mean that they are by the nature of their religion scientists. 

But if Judaism and its teaching on the material came from Hinduism, that means that our problems are not actually Jewish but Hindu.  There is a continuum between Hinduism and Judaism, and so it is time to talk less about Judeo-Christian culture, and more about Judeo-Hindu culture.  That attack on Western materialism came first from India, not Israel. Hinduism can only bring a mystical outlook to the West, something Spengler warned about.  We cannot slip into irrationalism and gibberish teachings, we must do what Spengler said and keep our technical thinking.  Hindu-Noahidism will destroy the West if we don't do anything to stop it.