Science is a boon to incestuous eugenics

 

The biggest argument against incest is the fact that it makes it more likely you will inherit recessive genetic diseases. This argument, morally, is false because then we would need to stop women over 40 from having children as this also increases the chances of internal disease. What is the point of incest? What is the point of incest in animal breeding? The point of incest in animal breeding is to bring together clusters of genes which could only be accomplished through incest. After several generations of amplifying a set of certain genes, you have a standard breed of dog or horse with predictable physical and behavioral outcomes. If applied to human families, standard breeding of humans could be produced. 

What is the point of creating standard breeds of humans? I come from the eugenic philosophy of Beyondism (here) which asks us to understand that it is very hard to predict which characteristics in humans will be best suited to the future and it is very hard to determine which morals we should use. Beyondism prescribes that the human race break up into ethno-states so that each nation is a cluster of related genes. Then we allow these ethno-states to form their own cultures. Genes and cultures are observed and those that are deemed helpful are absorbed by other member ethno-states. This is what Beyondism calls "cooperative competition", the differences between nations are measured and the best genes and culture are inducted. Obviously, those genes and cultures deemed deleterious are rejected and bred out, and culturally extinguished. 

What does this have to do with incest? It would be much easier to create isolated cultures and genes which are extremely honed and different from other groups through incest than it would be to take from several nations based on Beyondism principles, family culture of Beyondism instead. Genes can be isolated by families and family culture can be used instead of national culture. This Beyondism on a small scale would be much more practical today than intertwining Beyondism into the state. 

But still, there is the problem of genetic mutations and also the problem that families might not be sexually attracted to each other. But today we have science. We are able to screen embryos for genetic disease. We can also impregnate without sex so this eliminates the problem of unwanted sexual contact. Specific genes can be combined again through genetic screening and artificial fertilization. Science will make all the problems associated with incest eliminated, science is an ally to eugenic incest. 

How eugenic polygamists can take over society

 Monogamy is inherently dysgenic, in uncivilized times a few kings take massive harems and the vast majority of the common men do not breed. As these are wild times, the king-leaders would necessarily need to be the strongest, brightest, and most charismatic of all the men or he would be replaced, and so this harem system leads to only the best of the best of male genes being passed on. Now, this type of system is not possible in a more free and open society where we want women to enjoy their lives and perhaps not starve the vast majority of men of sex. But it is more civilized times that brought about the reproductive socialism of monogamy. As things become more civilized and more egalitarian, the men start agitating to have their own wives, monogamy ensures each man gets a wife, and so from only the best breeding, we get everyone breeding, good genes are not rewarded with higher fecundity and bad genes are allowed to enter the breeding pool, thus we see a decline in the quality of humans. This must be reversed in modern times, but by using modern social systems. 

The goal is for groups of eugenic polygamists to replace the monogamy of the earth, to rebreed the population in free love. If we are going to do that we need to have less males breeding with more females, without giving females the short end of the stick. The first step would be to start creating polygamist relationships consisting of many males and many females. Induct people into the group relationship to expand your influence, wealth, and power. Let people become involved with the group or with members of the group separately, bisexuality in the group would be helpful to facilitate relationship building within the group and outside of it. While polyamory would be practiced, only a few of the males would breed, this would be arrived at by either a group decision or my leaders who have been chosen within the family. We want to create the best race we can to compete with the monogamists. 

We need to establish many of these polygamous families and connect them through interrelationships. After this, we need to start agitating for the legalization of polygamous marriage. We need to get the recognition of the state so that we can begin to build power that is more integrated into the state. The next step is to start outbreeding the monogamists. How do we do this? We need to amplify birth control and sexual liberation in the population. Birth control allows people to have many lovers, and the more lovers you want, the more you need to use birth control, they are mutually reinforcing. Birth control and free love reduce the population as we have seen in the West. We want to get people accustomed to having many sexual partners so that the bonds of monogamy are weaker. This will also make the population more susceptible to being inducted into a free love marriage, they need to be with us and not a single jealous monogamist. 

This plan would reduce the population generally, but we, the polygamists, need to purposely pick up our breeding. We will be able to outdo the monogamists because we have a larger support base and more incomes to raise more children, and if we induct large segments of the population into our marriages, we will have a larger breeding pool. The general population will not be focused on creating a greater race or amplifying their numbers, but we will, that is how we will win. Notice this plan requires not need to take over the state or impose some authoritairian system.