My beliefs on Eugenics

It has taken a while to start breaking the ice, but lately I have been stepping out into the light more and more on my belief and support for Eugenics, especially among White, but certainly not only for them.  We have been led to believe through unfortunate experienced that eugenics is inherently evil and must result in persecution and holocausts for those who are deemed "unworthy" by some oligarchy. Well I am a eugenicist and I don't have ill intentions so I don't mind telling everyone exactly what it is that I believe.

Eugenics is often stated to be a way too "improve" the human race by selecting who has children, and who doesn't, but this is not exactly my definition. My definition of Eugenics is this: through selective breeding and genetic engineering, bloodlines can be produced which have ever more predictable physical and non-physical features.  That is it, Eugenics means "well bred", but well bred for what?  Well bred for a certain body type, temperament and even spirituality.

We know from working with animals all of these centuries that it is certainly possible to breed any animals into infinite sub-breeds, all of which have varying physical, mental, emotional and metaphysical characteristics.  We can breed dogs to be docile or aggressive, large or small, we can breed in them instincts such as digging, hunting and swimming; if done under strict conditions, these breed types basically come with expected aspects to their being.

The siphoning of traits and behaviors in animals and humans is a useful biological tool for our survival; traits and clusters of traits arise naturally in a population due to genetic permutations, than they are naturally selected for by the environment.  In deserts, water retention is valuable and so animals in a heard who have a higher genetic propensity for retaining body water have a reproductive advantage over those who don't; certain personalities and other specific arrangements of traits grow and spread in a population when they are good for survival in a particular environment, and who knows, maybe they are not randomly generated but retrieved through some feedback mechanism.

Whatever the reason is, we know that as one travels from one defined biome to another, their are subtle differences which begin to arise even within the same species, there is a cline of adaptation to the environment until definite sub-breeds appear and than eventually entirely new sub-species and species emerge which can no long breed with one another. This is how races, sub-races and new races rise and form, and if no longer adaptable, decline and perish.

But humans are not animals, we don't live under environmental conditions we can't change, humans can adapt their environment to suit themselves, and they can evolve to fit the environment they have created. For example, many people complain that modern convenience is breeding a race of soft and sickly over-civilized people who are dependent upon technology to live.  I recall a tale of how people with extreme allergies would move to dessert states like Arizona or New Mexico to avoid pollen, but they would meet and marry and produce children with extreme immune sensitivities; if it had not been for modern geological understanding and travel technology, such genetic anomalies could not occur.

For better or for worse, Eugenics also includes the idea of Euthenics, the idea that we can advance, diminish or just change the human race by improving or controlling the environment in which we live.  Recent studies in epigenetics (modification of gene expression) have found that we are very capable of inheriting phobias, fears, desire, likes, depressions and preferences from ancestors who had certain experiences. Perhaps this is how sub-breeds appear, perhaps living in a particular environment, eating particular foods, maybe it changes the epigenetics of the parent species which then effects the epigenetics of the offspring, molding them even better to the current living conditions.

Now under such a system a degree of reproductive racism would make sense since acquired sub-breed adaptations are necessary for the best life experience of the animal, and these are likely attached to certain hormones and impulses which would cause conflict with other sub-breeds of the same species. There is a reason why whites evolved in colder Europe, why dark people live along the equator, why Arabs have the complexion and temperament they do and so on. No biologist would ever say there are superior or inferior sub-breeds of any species, they would say there are only adapted breeds.

But once again we must see that we are not like other animals, we can change our environment and we do, and we travel and we interbreed far more often than we ever did and of course far more often than sub-breeds of other species do. Now some of course logically argue that their will always be a certain degree of mating between different breeds of the same animals because environment's change, new breeds become more dominant, or maybe nature is simply doing an experiment. But mating is never as random or haphazard as it is in the modern world, especially among whites who are most liberal on these issues.

Whites have not only devolved themselves by adapting to the luxuries of technology, they are also quickly stamping out their race by either not breeding at all, or mating with humans of other races.  Now, none of this is necessarily good or bad, as in a scientific view of things there is no real morality, but we are more than scientists and if any race has eugenics in its blood it would be the white race.

While all races do practice some form of eugenics, attempting to maintain good bloodlines and certain powers and abilities, none have taken these sentiments farther than the white race who in the beginning of the 20th century had many clubs, associations, labs and political movements deeply entwined in Eugenic thought and practice.  Almost all the leading theorists of Eugenics were whites and the movement was partially sparked by the perceived decline in health, number and ability of the white race in general, Eugenics was very much born of white apprehension.

It may also be true that whites are better evolved and programmed to institute Eugenics since many believe that long cold winters necessitated that whites adapt to being more farsighted, thinking many steps ahead in the future.  Eugenics does not think about right now (at least not usually) but thinks of the next generations to come. Perahaps other races have not bred under conditions which give them the impulse to plan so far ahead, maybe they just take it as it comes.

Now I do want to say here that not all Eugenic technology need be about future generations and not be able to help us in the here and now.  We do now understand that we all have genetic switches which can be turned on and off, it is possible to consume chemicals and hormones which effect how our genes interact with the rest of our body. There is also the benefit of having novel genetic traits to study in the bodies of healthy individuals so as to better understand bodily functions. The benefits of the genetic religion need not be kept for our children alone.

However, yes, this is mostly a future endeavor, but our opponents give us reason to think when they tell us we cannot predict the future, that we don't know which breeds and traits will be needed to survive in the future, and if we become too homogeneous so as to be a collective breed we could be putting ourselves in a genetic bottleneck, making our entire tribe susceptible to a certain disease which would wipe us all out. These were some of the scientific arguments against Hitler's Nazi Germany, who knew if it was best to breed the Nazi version of the "ideal man", maybe the ideal man would lack a particular gene that would saved him from the plague, maybe this gene was only found in some swarthy pauper.

So that leaves me here, I am a member of a dying race, namely whites, who seem to have it almost in their blood to think about and practice the religion of eugenics, yet who are not breeding and are quickly going extinct through intermixing with other races.  I just can't help it, I was born a Eugencist, the biological future of the human race is my destiny to ponder and attempt to order.  But how is one to order a system in which traits appear to adapt one to a specific environment, and none of these traits are the most useful trait all the time, and I don't know what will be the best choice for the future?

My views on Eugenics are not thoroughly my own, I do hale from thinkers, theorists and practitioners who came before me, but for right now I will not get into that but only my own personal theory which has begun to crystalize. So yes, it is true I don't know what will be the best breed or gene of sub-species to exist in the future, and it would be best for me to have a large and varying gene pool to select from, so the first step would be to leave people alone!

We need to allow races and sub-races to form in geographical territories so that they may naturally evolve to their surroundings, this will make them more happy and give those who are interested a more organic understanding of the rise and fall of traits in populations.  Of course there can be natural internal evolution through the spontaneous rise of genetically unique individuals, and there will always be cross cultural trade. By watching and observing, humans who have adapted for particular needs, the Eugenic religion can scout for genes and cultural practices which are seemingly beneficial for the human organism.

But I don't advocate an only "wait and see approach", living lives of power and near godhood in the future takes manipulation and stock products. There is a great advantage to watching natural evolution, but natural evolution is being interrupted greatly by modernity.  Unless we are going to drop science all together we must see the value in the artificial.  Just as we breed standard breeds of dogs and horses, we can breed standard breeds of humans whose qualities and needs are known more or less before birth. These breeds of humans would not only serve to live their best life possible in their own respect, but also lead to experimentation with different crosses and mixtures of breeds.

So how is this system going to work?  Well first there of course would need to be a founding group of idealists, those who wish to implement a system for its own sake, a group of people led by individuals who seem to be programmed for such thinking.  Let's not be embarrassed, to shame us for being who and what we are is as reprehensible and shaming one for their sexual orientation or aesthetic preferences. This group would be committed to fostering tribalism, nationalism and any other kind of ism which would help desiring populations to maintain some form of ethnic and biological identity which could be further honed through generational planning and genetic engineering, provided by our core group.

This inner core group of believers would than select certain genes and individuals to induct into our own specific breeding programs, always creating new lines and finessing old ones. This would give us many stock and unique breeds and individuals with great diversity so as to avoid being wiped out by a single plague.  However this diversity will also serve to help us be the people who will survive the future and be elevated to higher beings.

You see with foresight certain breeds can be created to withstand all sorts of future conditions, and these can be called upon when their biological gifts are needed. Also random breeding programs and genetic engineering can be used to create otherwise unpredictable strains of humans who just might so happen to have the combination needed to get us over the next metaphysical chasm.  Of course we would always have the natural strains of human to depend upon for ever fresh and adapted genes and clusters of genes.

But why whites?  Well, I think everyone can agree that it is whites who have the mentality and drive and yes need to create such a system, however that does not mean the lasting eugenicists will be white, indeed it is whites who are likely most willing to change their own race to become the gods they wish to be, because ultimately the gods born of Eugenics would be beyond the definition of white as they would no longer be humans. Also, there is of course no bar placed on other races who wish to accomplish similar ends.

Margaret Sanger, eugenics heroine, my guru on earth

Margaret Sanger is a women we hear about, but must of what we hear is not true.  The Left upholds her as an abortion crusader, the Christian Right paints her a racist genocidal maniac who wanted to eliminate blacks by terminating their pregnancies, and the common person does not know her at all.  But truth be told, I personally do know much about Margaret Sanger as she is my life heroine and guru and I have read all of her books (but not all of her papers).

My interest in Margaret Sanger began around the age of 23 or so. Do to seeing so much suffering and unhappiness around me, I had come to philosophize the reasons why so many things were wrong. The answers to these questions are multifaceted, nuanced and ever changing, but there is one avenue of thought which I entertain and believe is perennial, and that is Eugenics.  

Eugenics is more of less guiding the breeding and engineering of human beings to the point that they are free from many diseases and have amplified physical, mental, emotional and metaphysical powers.  However there is a dark twin opposite to eugenics, which tends to creep up in civilized societies, and that is dysgenics, conditions and breeding standards which increase diseases and weaknesses in the human race and are a strain on our material and ethereal being. 

Many who hold these beliefs also believe our current modern state of haphazard breeding coupled with idleness and too much assistance has weakened the human race, so have the abuses of capitalism and communism, both of which have at least at times, thrown the human animal into squalid living conditions which only selected for the most brutish members of our race while wasting away the more delicate thinkers who built democracy and the now far gone philosophies Ancient Greece. 

Like myself, Margaret Sanger went through a lot of suffering in her life, and she saw it in others as well.  She was born 1879 into a poor Irish Catholic family in an industrial town in Upstate New York.  Her mother was sick and overburdened by having birthed 18 children and raising 11 of them; her father was an alcoholic atheist philosopher, kind and evolved but totally irresponsible. The mostly Catholic town people had too many children to feed, unsatisfactory working conditions, and personal problems which made living exceedingly painful for many.

However Sanger did marry well, to an architect, and was able to see what middle class living was like, but she herself said it was almost like the hands of destiny which kept pushing her back to see the needs of the poor who lived in utter despair.  She became a travelling nurse, but most of her work took place in the slums of New York City where she worked among the putrid and overcrowded dwellings of the new incoming immigrants.

Again what Sanger saw over and over was too many mouths to feed, mothers and fathers working in life draining jobs and dangerous working conditions for long hours with few holidays. This left the people stressed out and bitter; they would take this out on their children, and wives and alcohol until the point that parents could no longer take it and would push their young children into the very same factories which had destroyed their own lives, and they did this with a coldness which comes when parenthood becomes slavery rather than a duty or joy.

Sanger's breaking moment came when she met an expectant mother to be who had nearly killed herself by trying to induce an abortion as she already had too many children.  After the doctor saved her life, the woman asked how she could stop having children, for which the doctor would give her no aid.  It was not long after this that Margaret was called back to this very same home where she encountered the mother dead, she had once again tried to induce an abortion and killed herself, or she may have committed suicide I can't remember.

This final sight of this misery flew Margaret into a conviction that she must do something to change the plight of men women and children, the families needed to be better planned so that all could be fed and children would not be viewed as an unwelcome burden.  Also parents needed time to elevate themselves and break the shackles of the industrial revolution, as well as thwart the false promises of Communism.  She decided to dedicate her life to legalizing and providing birth control to the masses.

You see in Sanger's time, during the inter-war period, birth control was not only illegal but was also legally obscene so one could not even send birth control literature through the mail system.  Sanger defied this law again and again as she worked to free the common man and woman from their then current biological bondage.  For this she was arrested many times and was subjected to social hounding and abuse. 

However Sanger also had another stated purpose in birth control and that was eugenics, she believed that slowing down the birth rate would have a eugenic effect on the population by making sure the mother was strongest and best nourished between births.  She also believed that births guided by love rather than accident and with more selective guidance would produce a "new race" with new characteristics who could bring peace to earth.  Sanger worked very hard with eugenicists from every race to ensure her vision. 

Sanger eventually built modern day Planned Parenthood after she legalized the use of birth control.  It is funny how many people, both Nazis and Christians, state that Margret Sanger was actually a secret racist because Planned Parenthoods tend to be found in non-white ethnic neighborhoods and disproportionately abort children of darker races; but Sanger, in all of her writings and lectures was always vehemently vociferously anti-abortion, so she could not have had this plan to abort any racial class into extinction, rather she worked with all races to improve themselves through plannned parenthood.

However Sanger was much more than a reformist and crusading eugenicist, she was a philosopher and radical.  In her magnum opus, "The Pivot of Civilization", Sanger not only brings forth her theories on Eugenics, birth control, industrialism and communism, but she also touches upon her theories surrounding sex and sexual liberation. Margaret hung around many prominent thinkers of the time, such as Aldous Huxley, but she was also closely acquainted with the sexology pioneer Havelock Ellis.

Through Ellis and other budding sexologists, Sanger helped promulgate the theory that genius and personal power came from the act of disinhibition,by losing all our fears and apprehensions and speaking, moving and acting the way we feel most natural and impulsed, we gain such rapid and profound mental and physical perceptions that our reactions almost seem oracular to outsiders. Sanger believed freedom of the sex act was the most disinhibiting action humans could take, and so she promoted sexual liberalism as a form of group empowerment and personal evolution, and she wanted women to join this power circle by lifting their fears of unwanted pregnancy.

So who was Margaret Sanger?  Yes, she was a eugenicist, she did work with eugenicists and expressed her desire to see a "new race", but she was also a passionate and empathic crusader for human liberty and self-empowerment.  During Sanger's time it was nearly impossible to selectively breed a new human race, but the poor, sick and infirm could use birth control to limit their families to numbers they could sustain and care for, thus improving the overall health of the population.

But her advocacy had another dimension, a dimension perhaps her male counterparts can more appreciate, Sanger spoke of "cradle competition", the fact that the educated classes bred more slowly than the working poor; it was near impossible to increase birth rates among the intelligentsia and physically fit, but the numbers could be evened out by slowing down the production of that grade of population who found it nearly impossible, due to exploitation, to care for themselves... this would also make the labor class less numerically disposable.

All of the eugenic institutions which were established during the inter-war period have since disappeared, and their theories have disappeared with them, all accept Margaret Sanger and her Planned Parenthood.  The modern day organization carries no mention of Sanger's original intentions, which was ultimately to breed a "cleaner race", but in the same sentence she called for a "greater individuality. The mostly Left controlled Planned Parenthood are blissfully unaware of the chain of events the founder has started.

Unlike almost any other thinker, Sanger actually was a "liberal", she did not advocate Leftist or Fascist control of the system to force humans to evolve but spoke and acted in their own interest, namely family limitation during a time when humans were under the unbearable pressure of having huge families in industrial towns which could not support them or create any standard of living, let alone dreams of selective breeding.

Many male eugenicists begrudge Sanger because of her sexually liberal philosophy, particularly for women, and because her cause and intervention of birth control has led to a rapid decline in the white birth rate in the Western world, but if we look at Sanger's intent we can find a ray of light.  Sanger was no libertine but saw sex and childbearing as the guiding force of civilization.  

It took 2-3 generations to get whites to this phase where most of us have been born into homes with manageable numbers of siblings, free from industrial and communist exploitation; the problem is not what Sanger did to bring about this golden opportunity, but the fact that whites are not properly taking advantage of this situation.  We no longer need marriage, forced sex or any other inhibiting morality to breed and engineer a new race, which were major factors during Sanger's time, but all we need is to be like Sanger, to bravely move forward with passion and drive. 

Some Whites want eugenics, so do it!

There is a "dirty word" and subject many of us, especially whites, like talking about in private discussion and that is eugenics.  Eugenics is a hard term to define, so let's just call it the selective breeding and genetic engineering of humans to amplify or reduce certain traits and create a somewhat predictable outcome in terms of outward and inner appearances. Basically what the eugenicists want to do is produce humans in ways that future physical, mental, emotional and metaphysical qualities can be known; we apply this very process to pet dogs which we genetically strain off into more certain temperaments and action abilities. 

There are so many ways eugenics can be applied, it can used to create thoroughbred stains of humans who are free form genetic diseases, resistant to most ailments, and we can likely conform them to any mental, social, physical or racial blueprint that we want. There are other forms of eugenics as well, passive forms of eugenics where we take a "wait and see" attitude, only breeding with those who have proven through the test of time their durability, their genetic- psycho precision and accuracy for the current need and circumstances, without us actually otherwise interfering in the genetic pool beyond this, a more natural approach.

I myself follow certain brands of eugenic thinking, which I will write about later, but we must talk about why this sacred and applied science is only discussed in hushed whispers, mainly by whites, and why it would be better for both whites and non-whites to get this stuff out in the open.  Look, the cat is out of the bag, everyone knows we can effect human evolution, even of current humans, by manipulating the environment and genetic machinery.  This is a technology which many powerful people are eager to use, and they will.

What happens when a legitimate almost sacred truth and desire is felt by people, but suppressed? Than only criminals have access to it and whoever gains control of the truth substance controls large numbers of people.  The reason why eugenics is a dirty word is because it was used most publicly and assertively by Adolph Hitler who wanted to use the science to breed a pure "Aryan" German race.  Hitler was able to use eugenics to his advantage because it had already been an unguided garden which many people wanted to see bloom, but they were lacking a gardeners.  When Hitler arrived he was able to capitalize on the frustrations of many intellectuals and medical professionals, he simply promised to give them the fruit vegetables they desired.

But Hitler conducted his business in all ways much to erratically and violently, and the way he used eugenics and his racial preferences were certainly not the only way to go, but because the eugenics movement had not grown enough to have it's power more evenly distributed and practiced among varying groups, Hitler was able to gain control of most of the movement and its human machinery, he was able to do this because the sciences and beliefs surrounded eugenics had been suppressed for many centuries under the church and other ignorances, and were now bursting to get through.  There is much to discuss about ancient eugenics, and how it is believed that in some ways this continues with the world elite today, but for now that is not the focus of this blog post.

The focus of this post is to direct whites, who are the ones talking about implementing eugenics the most it seems and have been doing so since the turn of the 20th century, that there are of course many way eugenics can be implemented and not all of them need to racist.  We all know that under controlled circumstances whites, if they had the determination, could create near large tribes dedicated to diverging their genetics in one direction or another.  But I said whites need to have the determination, as well as the skills and the IQ to begin implementing such strategies, as of course it won't be easy, but it's also not impossible.

The number one reason young white eugenicists don't work in consolidated groups is because they claim that if they came out and began practicing their religion than they would be hounded by other "normie whites", Jews, gays and racial minorities.  But this is for a specific reason, whites usually want to implement Eugenics for themselves, AND others, for some reason few whites have thought on focusing on their own biology to win at the game of evolution, indeed these science minded less social beings even tend to totally forget having their own children as they classify and specify other races whom many of them, until now, have marked as inferior.

No one said you need to be racist to practice Eugenics among yourselves, no one said that it is wrong for whites to come together socially and economically to breed and genetically engineer healthier, stronger, more intelligent, more just and overall more appealing whites, but what get's whites in trouble is when they feel the need to intervene and compare themselves to other races in this regard.  If other races don't want to practice eugenics on the level that the white races wishes to than let them, cruelty and oppression are not necessarily needed, especially when you have intelligence and the ability to work cooperatively when necessary.

The real problem is the lack of determination, white eugenic thinkers are not willing to sacrifice their social standing, their career, and their carefree childless lifestyles, they are also all much to independent and thus find it hard to cooperate with one another.  However this must change if those of us who say we want eugenics desperately truly want it.  We are smart enough to push for genetic power internally, without directing our negative energy outward in all directions and thus making enemies on every side, we can practice eugenics and grow and still be on good terms with the other races. If this is how we approach it than yes maybe perhaps we can create a race which are gods to us mortals now.