How does the alt-Right still not know about Talmud researcher Elizabeth Dilling?

My favorite book on the relationship between Judaism, Communism and Nazism is "A Program for Jews and Humanity" by Rabbi Harry Waton, I wrote a book review on this text (here). According to Rabbi Waton, yes the Jews are here to subdue the non-Jews and yes they use Communism to do it. There was one statement by the Rabbi which struck me and stood out, he said that the non-Jewish apprehension of Jewish domination is an "intuition", implying that it is not particularly grounded in hard facts.  I remember many years ago I was part of a discussion group which focused on the role of Jews in world affairs.  There was the typical talk of Jews running the banks and how Jews use "cultural subversion" to weaken nations... but non-Jews do these things too and I have heard many Jews comment that non-Jews are jealous because Jews are simply better at these practices; is it really so noble to hate Jews for being better "criminals"?  

I remember telling the group that I understood the Jewish Question "intuitively", but not factually as I could find nothing more than claims of Jewish malefactions which could and have been performed by every race and group, was this really distinctively Jewish?  The best hard evidence the group was able to provide me was a video which explained the "kosher tax" which is a sum paid to Jewish organization in order for them to approve almost all consumer products as kosher and thus open these markets to Jewish consumers. The claim is that the companies that pay these Jewish organizations to obtain their kosher status pass on the expense to the customers in elevated prices for goods and services, and so non-Jews are supposedly forced to pay Jews every time they purchase an item; this same exact argument is used against the Islamic halal tax. The allegation is that these Jewish organization then send this money to Israel which funds Zionist expansionism or is used for other “dubious” Jewish causes. Was this really the only hard testimony the "Jew Haters" had against the Jews, nitpicking over pennies? 

Still, as Rabbi Waton said, I continued to have this nagging intuition that there was something not right going on with the Jews, but I couldn't really write it out in black and white.  I kept my feelings on this private for a long time as I am not one to make claims without the proof.  However, I did have an ammunition which was the source of my own anti-Judaism and that was my study of the Old Testament.  I recently wrote an article on why I hate the Old Testament (here), the Jews are depicted as hateful, crafty, supremacist, thieving, lying, murderous, treasonous, bigoted, self-entitled and always playing the victim in their quest to steal the land of Canaan from the Canaanite pagans. I always sided with the more noble, honest and generous pagan Canaanites and Egyptians.  Now Jews wrote the Old Testament and so it is almost impossible that their holy book filled with so much hate, deception and subversion could not have an impact on their thinking and culture today. 

I remember one evening I was in a facebook group which featured debates between Jews and non-Jews and I began trying to pry at my intuition by intellectually attacking the Jews for their Old Testament, otherwise known as Torah.  I remember the Jews quickly and continuously knocked me down because their culture today resembles nothing of the old Torah, they are no longer that barbarous, and even though Israel is not fully a secular state, it has almost no comparison to the theocratic tyranny of ancient Israel. Jews claim they have evolved and that the Old Testament no longer really applies to their lives, their culture or religion. No matter how hard I tried to defame the Jews with the stories of the Torah, nothing took and I only looked foolish. One evening after a long debate I started feeling sick and feverish as I began to doubt my intuition and wonder if my suspicions had no basis in reality... were the Jews really benign? 

I wanted to settle this issue once and for all as now my mind was beginning to go insane and I wanted to come to a conclusion.  While debating with a particularly vicious Jew one night I began frantically searching for anything I could find, anything as I was about to concede; it seemed hopeless but then all of a sudden I came across a website I had seen before but had not read as it seemed so antiquated, www.come-and-hear.com by webmistress Carol A. Valentine. The website is very old fashion and for the beginner it is dense and confusing, but I was desperate so I browsed around, and then I came across it, an entire HTML version of "The Jewish Religion: its influence today" by Elizabeth Dilling (here). From what I understand, Elizabeth Dilling's journey began when, out of innocent curiosity she traveled to the USSR in order to explore the new world of Communism, a system she had not yet judged.  While in Russia, as a Christian, she was shocked by what she described as a sadistic hatred for Jesus which was pandemic in Russian culture at that time, along with the generally dictatorial power the Soviets had over the people. (See Dilling's Wikipedia here)

This seemed to have had a very strong effect on Dilling as she returned to the United States and became involved in several right-wing groups preaching against the horrors of Communism and writing several books exposing the infiltration of Communists in America. At first Dilling was not anti-Jewish and even supposedly left the activist group the Paul Reveres for their "anti-Semitism". However things changed when Dilling began being constantly accused of being "anti-Semitic" when her anti-Communist polemic mentioned nothing about Jews.  This confused Dilling who then began a decades long study of Judaism which eventually brought here to be as virulently anti-Jewish as she was anti-Communist, indeed claiming the two were synonymous.  In 1940 she published "The Octopus" (PDF here) which chronicled the collaboration between Jews and Jewish organizations with Communist movements in the United States. Due to her belief that Jews were pulling the strings behind internationalism, she began to push for isolationist policies in the USA and also became anti-British. 

However Dilling was not satisfied with simply tagging Jews on "guilt by association", she took a long time to deeply study the Jewish religion and Jewish scripture through almost exclusively Jewish sources.  Unlike me, Dilling eventually learned that the lifeblood of Jewish ideology is no longer the Old Testament but the Babylonian Talmud, a book written some centuries later which better describes and directs Jewish movements today.  In 1954 she published "The plot against Christianity" which she later renamed "The Jewish Religion: its influence today".  Now what is most notable about this text is that it very quickly sums up the history of Jewish thought and civilization and also rapidly teaches the student the break down and character of the Babylonian Talmud, she teaches you how to research and study Talmud.  In this book Dilling details many devious doctrines which Jews hold against non-Jews and how they are surreptitiously applied. Here is the detailed topic list from her chapter on how Jews may interact with non-Jews (see full detailed table of contents here):

Judaism — Anti-Gentilism and Exploitation of Non-Jews 

• Articles Lost By Gentiles
• Wine Touched By Gentiles
• Gentiles Cast in a Pit
• Non-Jews — "The People Who Are Like An Ass"
• Always Make Money
• Gentiles Are "Beasts"
• Non-Jews — No Property Rights
• Gentiles Must Not Rest, Even on Mondays
• Goring One's Ox
• In Law Suits, Cheat the Gentile
• Gentiles Must Suffer to Make Jews the Messiah
• Gentile Babies Defile
• Swearing Falsely — the Kol Nidre
• Robbery, Stealing, Murder — Approved Against Gentiles 
• Cheating a Gentile Out of Wages 
• Sodomy and Killing a Gentile 
• Kill the Gentile Who Studies the Torah 
• Accidental Killing of Jews

Now Dilling wrote her magum opus from a Christian perspective and so she reviles the Talmud for its induction of certain pagan elements from Babylon and includes chapters on Bible prophecy, however from her quoted Talmud research and cited Jewish sources, if you read her book which is not long, you will be fast tracked on the road the learning and understanding the true nature of Judaism.  I also appreciate that like myself Dilling makes it painstakingly clear that her criticism of Judaism has nothing to do with race, in fact, just like me, she states her belief that Jews are not a race at all, an opinion I know will not be popular with the alt-right; we are dealing with “anti-Judaism” here, not “anti-Semitism”. After reading this book I was able to go back to the Jewish debate forum, and when I began quoting the Talmud the Jews who were once laughing became much more uneasy and eventually became reluctant to talk. Now one still needs to be careful on how they quote and use the Talmud as nothing in Talmudic Judaism is direct or straightforward, but if you learn from Dilling's writing you will eventually find it will be much easier for you to converse with and change the minds of both Jews and non-Jews on these subject matter. Dilling’s book is just a primer, you need to use her provided resources to learn more if you want to be effective. What I want to say last is that by using Dilling's work, along with the other information available on www.come-and-hear.com, I was able to conduct my own Talmud research and eventually launched my own blog on the Talmud, “Stop Noahide Law”, which you can access (here). If you truly want to back up your intuition on the Jews, you need to start with Elizabeth Dilling. 

Easter/Passover celebrates child sacrifice and Communism

by Vincent Bruno 

Many pagans may have noticed that the Christian holiday of Easter and the Jewish holiday of Passover always seem to arrive around the same time, usually in early or mid April.  Also, some of you may have noticed that their are increasing numbers of Christians who celebrate Passover and their are even movements among Christians to remove Easter all together and have only the Passover celebration. What is the connection between Easter and Passover and what do these holidays represent? 

"Easter" Is Pagan

First let's talk about Christians Easter and why there are growing movements among Christians to stop celebrating this holiday.  Is the holiday of Easter ever mentioned in the Bible?  Does the Bible ever talk about the Easter Bunny or colored eggs?  None of these are ever mentioned in the Bible, however Easter does have its origins in ancient paganism.  Before we talks about the pagan origins of Easter, let's first talk about what Christians are celebrating on Easter.  According to Christians, Easter celebrates the day when their "Messiah" was supposedly resurrected after being dead for three days.  The Christian holiday of Good Friday is related to Easter as this is when Christians believe Jesus was hung on the cross. 

The Bible never calls the resurrection of Jesus "Easter", nor does it prescribe the traditional Easter paraphernalia of eggs and bunnies, however it is creditably asserted by many historians that Easter is named after the old pagan fertility goddess Ostera (Ēostre). During the time when the Catholic Church was trying to Christianize pagan Europe, they found it very difficult to break the populace from their old pagan customs.  One of these customs, particularly in the Germanic people, was the celebration of the coming of Spring with festivals to the fertility goddess Ostera, her patron animals and items were hares and eggs.  Mythologist Jacob Grimm who is famous for being one of the Grimm Brothers and editor of the notorious "Grimm's Fairy Tales" stated he believed that the Christians could not dissuade the Europeans from engaging in this ancient pagan festival to Ostera (Ostera = Easter) and so they simply kept the name and changed it's meaning to the celebration of Christ's resurrection.

We Germans to this day call April ostermonat, and ôstarmânoth is found as early as Eginhart (temp. Car. Mag.). The great Christian festival, which usually falls in April or the end of March, bears in the oldest of OHG remains the name ôstarâ ... it is mostly found in the plural, because two days ... were kept at Easter. This Ostarâ, like the [Anglo-Saxon] Eástre, must in heathen religion have denoted a higher being, whose worship was so firmly rooted, that the Christian teachers tolerated the name, and applied it to one of their  own grandest anniversaries. - Jacob Grimm 

Christians Rejecting Easter For Passover 

See: "The Truth About Easter" By David M Rogers

 It is because of Easter's pagan overlay that many Christians are beginning to abandon Easter and many of them are replacing Easter with the traditionally Jewish Passover, but how are the two related?  Besides the fact that Easter has a pagan costume, nowhere in the Bible are Christians told they are to celebrate the raising of Jesus from the dead, however Jesus did tell Christians to celebrate an event of his life, the "Last Supper", which was a Passover Supper. Jesus himself was an Israelite, he was born and raised in Israel, and he of course celebrated Israeli holidays. The famous painting "The Last Supper" by Leonardo Da Vinci shows Jesus celebrating the Israelite holiday of Passover, not Easter. It was at this Last Supper that Jesus includes the rituals of his remembrance into the original meaning of the Passover festival, he tells his followers to break bread and drink wine to remember him.  Many Christians have realized that this is the holiday which Jesus commanded, a Passover dinner, and not his resurrection, so many of them have begun abandoning Easter for Passover. Easter is always around the same time as Passover because this is when Jesus was hung on the cross and resurrected, right after his own Passover "Last Supper".  In the Christians world, Passover and Easter are almost interchangeable. 

 8 (Jesus) sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and prepare the Passover for us, that we may eat.”... 19 He took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and gave to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in memory of me.” 20 Likewise, he took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you. 21 But behold, the hand of him who betrays me is with me on the table. 22 The Son of Man indeed goes, as it has been determined, but woe to that man through whom he is betrayed!” - Luke 22

What Is Passover? 

So if Jesus was celebrating Passover and he told his followers to engage in rituals to remember him during a Passover meal, then Passover must inherently be a Christian holiday, but what does Passover celebrate? Many pagans have heard the story of how the pagan Egyptians supposedly enslaved the Israelites and that the Judeo-Christian god finally set his people free by sending an angel to murder all the firstborn sons of the Pagan Egyptians. Now academics and historians are very doubtful that this enslavement of the Israelites in Egypt ever happened, but the reality of these events is not what Jews or Christians are celebrating, they are celebrating an underlying meaning and message, a message of how Israel used Communism to destroy Egypt. 

The idea that Communism comes from the Bible may sound a little far fetched to some, isn't Communism a atheist doctrine which has killed millions of Christians?  Communism is simply the non-theistic form of a system devised in the Bible book of Genesis which the Israelites used to capture all the land, money and power of the Pagan Egyptians who had done nothing but help them. The story of Passover does not start with the slavery of the Israelites, but several generations earlier in another Pagan land, the land of Canaan. At this time their were no Jews or Christians or even any nation of Israel, there was only a small family tribe which called itself Israel.  

How Israel Ended Up In Egypt 

This tribe held the belief that their jealous god have given the land of Canaan to them as a birthright and that they would one day drive off the Pagan Canaanite inhabitants and claim it as their own.  In the meanwhile, this tribe has to tolerate the Pagan around them which they needed to use for the time being.  Now there was one boy born into this tribe named Joseph, and he was the favorite son of his father Jacob.  Joseph's brothers become jealous of Joseph and so they sell him into slavery where he eventually finds himself in the Pagan land of Egypt. 

 3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age, and he made him a coat of many colors. 4 His brothers saw that their father loved him more than all his brothers, and they hated him, and couldn’t speak peaceably to him.... 26 Judah said to his brothers, “What profit is it if we kill our brother and conceal his blood? 27 Come, and let’s sell him to the Ishmaelites, and not let our hand be on him; for he is our brother, our flesh.” His brothers listened to him. 28 Midianites who were merchants passed by, and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silver. They brought Joseph into Egypt. - Genesis 37

Through a series of intrigues the Israelite Joseph becomes the favored man of the pagan Pharaoh of Egypt who makes Joseph the second most powerful man under himself and gives him control over the nation's grain supply, and will later give him control of the nation's gold. Joseph is dressed in royal robes and given royal jewelry to signify his granted authority. 

40 You shall be over my house, and according to your word will all my people be ruled. Only in the throne I will be greater than you.”41 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “Behold, I have set you over all the land of Egypt.”42 Pharaoh took off his signet ring from his hand, and put it on Joseph’s hand, and arrayed him in robes of fine linen, and put a gold chain about his neck, 43 and he made him to ride in the second chariot which he had. They cried before him, “Bow the knee!” He set him over all the land of Egypt.44 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “I am Pharaoh, and without you shall no man lift up his hand or his foot in all the land of Egypt.” - Genesis 41

Biblical Communism

Eventually a famine hits not only Egypt but also Joseph's home territory of pgan Canaan.  Joseph's Israelite brothers travel to Egypt to purchase grain. Joseph recognizes his brothers who sold him into slavery and initially get's angry and keeps some of them hostage, but eventually the Israelite brothers make up and once again become a family.  The generous pagan Pharaoh of Egypt hears that Joseph has found his long lost brothers and graciously offers to provide not only free transportation for all of the Israelites to come to Egypt, but he also offers them the very best of the land of Egypt, the land of Goshen which is closest to their "home" in pagan Canaan.

16 The report of it was heard in Pharaoh’s house, saying, “Joseph’s brothers have come.” It pleased Pharaoh well, and his servants. 17 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “Tell your brothers, ‘Do this. Load your animals, and go, travel to the land of Canaan. 18 Take your father and your households, and come to me, and I will give you the good of the land of Egypt, and you will eat the fat of the land.’ 19 Now you are commanded: do this. Take wagons out of the land of Egypt for your little ones, and for your wives, and bring your father, and come. 20 Also, don’t concern yourselves about your belongings, for the good of all the land of Egypt is yours.”... Make your father and your brothers dwell in the best of the land. Let them dwell in the land of Goshen. If you know any able men among them, then put them in charge of my livestock.” - Genesis 46-47

Eventually the famine worsens and the people of Egypt are starving.  Remember, Joseph is in control of all the grain supply in Egypt and he is also apparently in control of the central money supply as well. The starving Egyptians go to Joseph who first tells them to give him all their gold in exchange for food.  Joseph gives the Egyptians food, however the Bible says he places the gold in the Pharaoh's house and does not let it back out into the economy, the Bible tells us that all of the gold in Egypt and Canaan dries up and the people cry "our money fails", the money fails because Joseph has it all stored in the Pharaoh's house.

  13 There was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very severe, so that the land of Egypt and the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. 14 Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the grain which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh’s house. 15 When the money was all spent in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came to Joseph, and said, “Give us bread, for why should we die in your presence? For our money fails.” - Genesis 47

With no gold in the economy, and the people once again starving, the Egyptians go back to Joseph to get food, but this time he demands their animals and when they have run out of food again the pagan Egyptians offer up their lands and themselves as slaves.  Joseph takes all the land of the pagan Egyptians and gives it to the Pharaoh, he and collectivizes the Egyptians into the cities.  There are only three factions of Egyptian society who any longer have money or land, the Pharaoh, his elite priests, and the Israelites who are living in the best of the land in Goshen.

16 Joseph said, “Give me your livestock; and I will give you food for your livestock, if your money is gone.”17 They brought their livestock to Joseph, and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for the horses, and for the flocks, and for the herds, and for the donkeys: and he fed them with bread in exchange for all their livestock for that year. 18 When that year was ended, they came to him the second year, and said to him, “We will not hide from my lord how our money is all spent, and the herds of livestock are my lord’s. There is nothing left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands. 19 Why should we die before your eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants to Pharaoh. Give us seed, that we may live, and not die, and that the land won’t be desolate.”

20 So Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh, for every man of the Egyptians sold his field, because the famine was severe on them, and the land became Pharaoh’s. 21 As for the people, he moved them to the cities from one end of the border of Egypt even to the other end of it. 22 Only he didn’t buy the land of the priests, for the priests had a portion from Pharaoh, and ate their portion which Pharaoh gave them. That is why they didn’t sell their land. 23 Then Joseph said to the people, “Behold, I have bought you and your land today for Pharaoh. Behold, here is seed for you, and you shall sow the land.24 It will happen at the harvests, that you shall give a fifth to Pharaoh, and four parts will be your own, for seed of the field, for your food, for them of your households, and for food for your little ones.” 

25 They said, “You have saved our lives! Let us find favor in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh’s servants.” 26 Joseph made it a statute concerning the land of Egypt to this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth. Only the land of the priests alone didn’t become Pharaoh’s. 27 Israel lived in the land of Egypt, in the land of Goshen; and they got themselves possessions therein, and were fruitful, and multiplied exceedingly. - Genesis 47

The Israelite's Flaunt Their Power 

Now with the Israelites in firm control of Egypt, Joseph's father Jacob tells his son he does not want to be buried in Egypt but wants his body transported back to the pagan land of Canaan seeing that their jealous god has promised that this land will belong to them through theft. Once Joseph's father Jacob dies, the Israelites hold a grand procession with all of their Egyptian servants to carry not only Jacob's body but also all of the male household members of Israel all the way up to the land of Canaan where Jacob will be buried, all of this is done on the Egyptian dime. Even though Jacob is to be buried in Canaan, Joseph makes sure that his father is embalmed like a Pharaoh and that all of the landless Egyptians are brought to cry for seventy days as if this were the death of a king of something.

 28 Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years. So the days of Jacob, the years of his life, were one hundred forty-seven years. 29 The time came near that Israel must die, and he called his son Joseph, and said to him, “If now I have found favor in your sight, please put your hand under my thigh, and deal kindly and truly with me. Please don’t bury me in Egypt,30 but when I sleep with my fathers, you shall carry me out of Egypt, and bury me in their burying place.” He said, “I will do as you have said.” 31 He said, “Swear to me,” and he swore to him. Israel bowed himself on the bed’s head. - Genesis 47 

50 1 Joseph fell on his father’s face, wept on him, and kissed him. 2 Joseph commanded his servants, the physicians, to embalm his father; and the physicians embalmed Israel. 3 Forty days were fulfilled for him, for that is how many the days it takes to embalm. The Egyptians wept for him for seventy days... 7 Joseph went up to bury his father; and with him went up all the servants of Pharaoh, the elders of his house, all the elders of the land of Egypt, 8 All the house of Joseph, his brothers, and his father’s house. Only their little ones, their flocks, and their herds, they left in the land of Goshen. - Genesis 50

The Egyptians Turn On Israel  

The Bible tells us that eventually Joseph dies and that a new Pharaoh rises in Egypt who sees right through the Israelites and understands them to be enemies who could easily use their land in Goshen to plot treason against Egypt and then escape back to the land of Canaan with all their wealth.  Seeing that the Egyptian people have been robbed of their land, gold and freedom by the Israelites, they turn on this tribe and very viciously enslave them, in Hinduism we call this Karma.

8 Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who didn’t know Joseph. 9 He said to his people, “Behold,[a] the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we. 10 Come, let us deal wisely with them, lest they multiply, and it happen that when any war breaks out, they also join themselves to our enemies, and fight against us, and escape out of the land.” 11 Therefore they set taskmasters over them to afflict them with their burdens. They built storage cities for Pharaoh: Pithom and Raamses. 12 But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and the more they spread out. They were grieved because of the children of Israel. 13 The Egyptians ruthlessly made the children of Israel serve, 14 and they made their lives bitter with hard service, in mortar and in brick, and in all kinds of service in the field, all their service, in which they ruthlessly made them serve. - Exodus 1

Jews And Christians Celebrate Pagan Child Sacrifice 

To make a long story short, the Bible tells us that the Judeo-Christian god wants to make an example of Egypt, and so he puts it into the heart of the Pharaoh to be merciless with the devious Israelites, not setting them free, and thus give their god the excuse to go to such extreme measures as mass murdering all the firstborn sons of Egypt. As the Judeo-Christian god has planned, the Egyptian Pharaoh keeps the Israelites in slavery despite several plagues, until finally the Judeo-Christian god sends one of his angels to murder the Egyptian children. The Israelites are protected from this genocide by killing a lamb and splattering it's blood on their doorways as a signal. The Bible instructs Judeo-Christians to commemorate this genocide every year by preparing a lamb  meal for their families. The holiday is called "Passover" because those Israelite's who had lamb blood on their door were "passed over" during the genocide. 

3 I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt. 4 But Pharaoh will not listen to you, and I will lay my hand on Egypt, and bring out my armies, my people the children of Israel, out of the land of Egypt by great judgments. 5 The Egyptians shall know that I am Yahweh, when I stretch out my hand on Egypt, and bring out the children of Israel from among them.” - Exodus 7 

11 This is how you shall eat it: with your belt on your waist, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and you shall eat it in haste: it is Yahweh’s Passover. 12 For I will go through the land of Egypt in that night, and will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and animal. Against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am Yahweh. 13 The blood shall be to you for a token on the houses where you are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and there shall no plague be on you to destroy you, when I strike the land of Egypt. 14 This day shall be to you for a memorial, and you shall keep it a feast to Yahweh: throughout your generations you shall keep it a feast by an ordinance forever.  - Exodus 12

So what does Easter/Passover represent, what are Jews/Christians celebrating on this day?  Jew and Christians who engage in the more Biblical version of this holiday will eat a dead lamb (sacrificed innocence) to remind them that their god committed a mass child sacrifice against pagan Egypt. Judeo-Christians will only tell you one side of the story, they will only tell you that the evil Egyptians enslaved the Israelites, but they won't tell you why this happened.  Pagan Egypt had given an Israelite the most powerful position in the land next to the Pharaoh, pagan Egypt had saved Israel from famine, transported them all to Egypt for free and gave them the very best of their lands.  When the famine grew and the Egyptians were starving, the Israelites used their power and influence to extort all of the gold from the pagan Egyptians and purposely store the gold up in the Pharaoh's house until their was not money left in circulation.  When the Egyptian people cried "our money fails" Israel took their animals and then their land and their bodies.   The landless Egyptians were herded into cities, meanwhile the Israelites along with the Pharaoh and his elite priests became the only land owning and wealthy class in Egypt.  When you become the bureaucratic class of the ruling elite, and use your control over the central money supply to crash the economy and then relieve the populace of their land and collectivize them into cities, this is called Communism. Israel became slaves in Egypt because the enslaved Egyptians realized what had happened to them and they turned on the wealthy land owning Israelites who had destroyed their nation. In return the Judeo-Christian god murdered all the Egyptian first born sons... this is what Jews/Christians are celebrating on Easter/Passover. 

Are men ready for socialized motherhood

I find it funny that the only tale of communized motherhood which both traditionalist men and feminist women want to quote is "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood. The story tells of the takeover of modern American society by a fascistic Christian fundamentalist cult of men who establish an Old Testament tyranny and round up women to force some of them into marriages and others into sexual and breeding slavery; the name of the book is based upon the handmaidens of the Old Testament who bore children for Jacob in lieu of their wives. The women are not allowed to read or write and basically have no rights at all, they are assigned to their "masters" for childbearing. 

Feminists hold this up as a warning against patriarchy and totalitarianism while many traditionalist men resonate with the story and believe this is how society ought to run. The men of the book resemble the alt-right men of today in a certain way, while they would obviously despise all forms of Communism, the assignment of women for breeding has a ring of Socialism to it, the collective  ownership of "property" and decisioning on the distribution of resources; while the Nazis hated Communism the ideology they espoused was "National Socialism" which implies Socialism not on an international scale but on a folkish scale. 

It is an odd kind of logic that while men have proven themselves to be the inventors and establishers of at least state Socialism, it is women who are often blamed for the socialization of societies.  Famous American authoress and right-wing political pundit Ann Coulter is highly educated, fierce and independent, however she seemingly contradictorily does not support women's suffrage.  Coulter evidences the fact that in the United States the number of women participating in voting is positively correlated with an increase in government spending on social welfare programs; a woman's instinct to nurture children and expectation that a man will provide for her and the child's needs are usually sighted as the culprit for this parallel. Greek playwright Aristophanes wrote a few plays which boded the negative effects of women being involved in matters of the state. In one play, "The Assemblywomen", women have taken over the state and have installed a form of pro-communism where all are entitled to sexual rights including the old and the ugly. 

However, despite feminist tendencies often being blamed for today's creeping Socialism, it was again a man, Plato, who perhaps wrote the first Communist Manifesto. In his treatise "Republic" the philosopher Plato lays out his vision of the ideal state.  Private property is abolished, so is marriage, childcare is communal and all citizens are asked to forsake their private lives for the sake of upholding the state. In his ideal statecraft Plato proposes that women, like men be highly educated and equal under the law. Yet Plato's advocating for the equality of women was not based upon modern day feminist theory but the idea that women needed to serve the state not just in the form of childrearing and sexual liaisons with their husbands but also intellectually as if they were kept dumb and narrow they would focus all their energy on the private sphere and thus take the men away with them into the family realm where their talents would less effectively serve the public. 

While the above scenario has never been implemented and is believed to be absurdly idealistic by all ideological denominations there is something to be said for the fact that it is men who come up with the ideal of socialized motherhood but it is women who seem to try to implement it in real life in their own vision... of course it is the influence of women which has expanded the welfare state particularly in its support for single mothers. While few modern Nazi's like to discuss this it was well known that both Hitler's supporters and detractors were well aware of his unusually feminine qualities: the way he walked, the way he wrote, and especially his "way of thinking"; many of his soldiers did not appreciate the overly mothering attitude he took toward the men.  

It was under Adolph Hitler’s Socialist regime that the world saw perhaps the first ever semi-successful implementation of a state breeding program. Lebensborn which means "life spring" was an initiative to have young desirable fertile females to be fully taken care of by the state in a communal setting where they were free to mate with top SS officers in the hopes of producing superior stocks of Aryan children. While the program had much success, it never reached its full potential.  But it should be noted that in supposedly morally traditionalist Nazi Germany the state engaged in the institution of adultery and women having multiple sex partner, something that would be less tolerated in the private sphere of life. I think it is fairly obvious that the greatest opponents of sharing women in common are heterosexual men who want their own wife reserved for them alone, regardless of the fact that they usually expect to have their own affairs outside of marriage. 

Going back to Plato's Republic, there was another phenomena in his theory which is palatable to most right wing men today as it resembles the caste system and that was the ideal of every man and woman being placed in a compartmentalized task position based upon their primary psychological and physiological dispositions. The old time commoner's practice of this system can be seen in the Indian Hindu gotra system where occupational castes engage in strict arranged marriages which are based upon a complex system of interfamilial marriage which is designed to allow a certain degree of inbreeding, but not so close as to bring forth recessive mutations, this so as to preserve the generational mentality of the community which is honed for their caste occupation and culture. However, because this is a private and plebeian institution it lacks intensive rigor in producing hyper-specialized breeds and individuals of men for insulate state occupations. 

Plato did not advocate the education and equality of women based on enthusiasm but functionality, and it would seem until now that men who desire nothing but conservative monogamy have not been able to tolerate this logic, the mobs seems almost programmed to reject more radical ideas. Science is only now discovering what the occult has known for ages, that the mother's experience in life does in fact pass onto and effects the personality and abilities of her offspring, today the science is known as epigenetics. While the suppression of education for women has been almost universal throughout history it is admitted that pagan women usually fared better in this realm than the Abrahamics, there were even European pagan women who were highly educated and respected advisers. Since the mother's life experiences and training are transmitted to her offspring as a mentality, it is most fitting for the dogmatic and stupid Abrahamic religions that she remain an ignorant, sedative and abused slave as her children are desired to be born with a taste for the society’s megalithic slave religion, while the more intellectual and philosophical religions of the pagans needed men who had a more free and liberal temperament. 

The pagan ideal has always been the ever increasing perfection of men into godhood, but how can he achieve this without the perfection of woman?  Would it not be best for the biological and spiritual stock of society to be incubated in the wombs of women who have been carefully cultivated over generations using the proved science of epigenetics? As far as intelligent breeding goes it was stupid of the men of the Old Testament to rarely every record the mothers of famous lineages much less their temperaments as these would have been hidden by their social stunting. What if women were observed for their natural propensities, whether these be mathematical, musical, militaristic or otherwise, and the best of them were inducted into training programs which would supplement their natural intelligence and prepare them to become vessels for the production of a new generation which would experience these powers amplified? Could she not then be given options of men with whom to breed which match her mind and body’s complexion so as to beget children who are both stable in their trait balances and honed in their abilities? 

The system proposed above does have its counterparts in reality, particularly in the Near East.  Babylon was famous for its state-religious breeding temples where the finest women were educated in the ways of the gods and secular subjects and then impregnated by kings so as to produce the ideal line of accession. The Babylonian king Nabonidus was not mothered by a queen but by a moon priestess named Addagoppe of Harran; perhaps it was his mother's psychogenetic influence which caused Nabonidus to break all tradition and replace the patron god Marduk with the moon god Sin as the highest deity of the land, this despite the anger of his subjects. Many such priestesses held state positions and could even inherit land.  Would it not be better to have sons born to women who were not only trained in government but whom had practical experience so that she could best guide her son to his likely position in society and also have land which she may inherit to him so as to provide him with a sound base for maintaining his worth in society as well as perhaps breeding his own traditional family? 

But now there is the practical issues to deal with and that is the proletariat who seemed to have less to gain from this older system of socialized motherhood. Polygamy has always been the prerogative of kings and not his subjects as the king would of course take the best women for himself and if he had pools of women eventually there would have to go men who have none. The peasant's disdain for polygamy has led to the dysgenic phenomena of universal monogamy where every man, no matter his caliber, is provided a woman with whom to breed, thus increasing the ranks of the lower classes while depriving the best and brightest men from the opportunity of producing as many children as possible through plural marriage.  But this could be a problem caused by an individual polygamous male’s ownership of the females rather than the simple supporting of these females by the state. 

The king or chieftain would usually horde his concubines for himself and thus leave many of his monogamous subjects sexless, and for many men sex is the primary reason for marriage. However free women who were not owned by any man would be free to engage in sex with whomever, and with the use of advanced birth control methods she could please the "ugly and the old" as in the play Assemblywomen thus satiating their needs and preventing their neglect from becoming the fuel for social revolution against the state and the re-enslavement of women as nothing more than caged breeding machines. In fact, it is very possible that if given access to free prostitution that the lowest men least deserving of fatherhood would have no issue abandoning the institution of marriage all together and simply living a life of sex without any obligations. 

Now of course there could be varying categories of these women with whom the men of the state and civilians would breed as many upper-class men would find it distasteful to breed with a free love women, but not all women are so amorous in their nature and the more composed females themselves would obviously usually be attracted to more restrained and austere men. Some believe that it is not altogether natural for men to live constantly in the home and that it is best he live apart and only provide and visit, arrangements could be made where men would have their own families but much of the stress and burden of family life would be lifted from him so that his time spend with his children could be more productive and joyful. 

Yet socialized traditional motherhood does not mean monogamy cannot or should not exist on a mass scale as this is usually the preferred choice of both men and women, no matter how hypocritical the institution tends to be. Excess males and females from the state breeding temples would be free to enter mainstream society where they could act as partners for the average citizens, thus increasing the genetic quality of the population overtime.  The need for monogamy could even be prepared for by breeding surplus numbers of women with temperaments more suited for this lifestyle.  Not every women wants to be overly educated and wants to be attractive to the common man who is usually not attracted to women smarter or more educated than himself, this type of bred woman would easily transition into the life of monogamy. However these programs would obviously breed races of men who are accustomed to the academy of socialized breeding and if the system were sustainable and superior then perhaps after some time this system would become the norm and Plato's ideal Republic could be realized.  In the meanwhile, the state would have plenty of Plato's men and women who have no private distractions and can devote their entire lives to the state... even if it is found that a private monogamous underclass is needed to uphold the government. 

It is men who dream of socialized motherhood but perhaps it is women who are more eager to implement it.  While not all women would be attracted to the vision presented above it is perhaps the best, the brightest, and most independent of our women who would value the opportunity to live in comfort where her gifts would be recognized and nurtured while she is able to bear children at a reasonable pace and still engage in matters of the world.  The Babylonians did it, and Hitler got close, but can the men of today seek to establish such an institution?  Who knows, it will have to be done on trial and error and needs men who understand the mass psychology of their male followers.  However, if he makes this modern day Communist motherhood appealing, I doubt he will find any trouble inducting females into the program whom will likely need little guidance in initiating and maintaining its daily operations.  With women given what seems to be an innate desire, the socialization of motherhood, perhaps they would be less likely to agitate for this law in broader society, which could one day be made up of single males, or not, who knows, and thus leave men to their more natural instinct of individualism... the war between the sexes could be ended.