Pornography as eugenic genocide

Some time ago I wrote a post about my heroine and guru on earth, the notorious birth control advocate and eugenicist Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger's brilliant eugenic program is today hidden by the left and is unknown to the right, however it can be argued that she and she alone has had the greatest and longest lasting eugenic effect on the human race in human history. It was H.G. Wells who said  "When the history of our civilization is written, it will be a biological history, and Margaret Sanger will be its heroine."

During Sanger's time during the interwar period, eugenics was a popular topic on both the left and the right as these were more honest times and all could see that human civilization could not advance until the race itself had been reformed. However, the focus in Sanger's time was what we today call "positive eugenics", meaning the focus was on breeding healthier happier humans, rather than preventing the breeding of those who did not even desire life themselves.  The ideal was to have more children born from the upper classes and less from the lower classes.  Sanger was perhaps the only thinker of her time to see that this program, at least during her generation, would not work. 

In her magnum opus "The Pivot of Civilization" she dedicates a chapter to the concept of "cradle competition".  Sanger intelligently argued that no social program could be enacted which would encourage the more productive classes of society from breeding children in large numbers as of course their culture was not conducive to this lifestyle. In her age Sanger explained that the only way to have a eugenic effect on the population was to go from the other side, and to reduce the number of births among the dependent classes.  During the 1910's and 1920's it was not uncommon for the poorest members of society to have eight children or even more, while the shop owners and business men may have had two or three. Sanger argued that if the intelligentsia could not be given the incentive to breed more, the ratio between the haves and the have not could be evened out by providing birth control for the lower strata of society. 

By the end of WWII the positive eugenic programs of America and Europe had failed to set up any lasting breeding programs, however Sanger's birth control movement survived and grew into an international empire. Today, in the West, the better off classes still breed slowly, however their competitors at the other end of the spectrum have also seen a drastic decline in their reproduction. Even in the most impoverished and ignorant of household one can hardly ever find more than three of four children any more. Sanger's program has done its job, it has evened out the cradle competition  and has made the situation slightly more manageable for us the dedicated eugenicists. However, it is also true that birth control and now abortion have also been used by those classes which the eugenicist desires, but this is only a problem because we have not yet found the way to establish positive eugenic programs which increase the numbers of this class. 

Positive eugenics is desperately needed and needed now, however that is a topic for another post, what must be discussed now is the next step in negative eugenics, and this was accidentally discovered by the female birth control eugenicists 100 years ago.  Sanger was not the only woman eugenicist of her time, her most famous counterparts were the scientist Marie Stopes and the social reformer and political hopeful Victoria Woodhull.  These women had more in common than just their crusade for eugenics and birth control, they also saw their institution as a sexual revolution for free love. Sanger, Stopes, and Woodhull each advocated for forms of free love and female sexuality, but it resembled nothing of what we see today. Many modern socially minded people blame Sanger and her cohorts for the blatant abuse and trivialization of sex by a shallow and hedonistic generation, and yes to a great extent this is true, but this was never the intention. 

These women eugenicists did not write of free love in any passionate or licentious way, but in a constructive and almost metaphysical fashion. Sanger taught that humans could unlock their psychic potentials when they lost their inhibitions and fears, that the social cramping of the Christian era hasd mentally and physically stunted the human race.  While she advocated for all forms of disinhibition and freedom, she believed that the most disinhibiting act was to release the tensions surrounding the sex act, as sex is perhaps the most constrained and regulated behavior on earth, not to mention the one which people most desire. The idea of these female eugenicists was to not only reduce the population of those who were a burden on themselves, but to also give the higher classes access to greater brain activity and a general desire to continue life into a race of children made clean and strong through the science of eugenics.

Unfortunately for these visionaries, this is not how the vast majority of humanity has used their technology, as today sex is hardly ever advertised as a mechanism for social and personal advancement but nothing more than meaningless entertainment, there is no real higher philosophy to be found in today's sex industry, and of course the misuse and misguidance of sex has also contributed to racial decline as a childless sensualism is encouraged. The more serious minded reformers of the past century would not be pleased with the direction their movement has taken.  However, there is and will always be, a minority of persons who do see and can use the more productive side of free love, and it is time these men and women uptake their own crusade of cradle competition.

I cannot stress enough that no eugenic program, especially now, can help the human race without an intense positive eugenic aspect, we must breed a new race or perish, it is as simple as that.  However, today, like in Sanger's time, we are still crowded and choked by hoards of humanity who could care less about such endeavors and indeed have made it their business to distract the human race into sexual frivolity.  The serious reader must be aware that for millennia sex was integrated into the state and religion of pagan empires.  Babylon was famous for maintaining harems which housed sacred prostitutes who not only provided sexual services but also religious rites, and that these harems served as breeding programs from which even kings were born.  The Hindus have practiced tantric sex for centuries, the use of sex not just for gratification but to obtain higher states of awareness.  This mentality has survived in the West but only in a minority, it is the chosen few who are able and willing to channel their sexuality into higher civilizational expression. 

What is being advocated is this, yes pornography and free love has accidentally despite best intentions lead to a social and biological decline, but we must ask ourselves, what kind of people are disappearing?  The fact remains that every man and woman in the West has a choice, yes they can wrap themselves in meaningless smut, but the higher ideals of sex magic and sexual compatibility for breeding still exist. For those who object to free love you may wish to read the works of Marie Stopes as she advocated for better sexual compatibility within marriage as a means toward eugenics. The female eugenicists of the past century were the type who were mature enough to embrace sexual liberation without falling into the pit of sexual nihilism and self-destruction, and this is the stock of people we are looking for, and it is these steely minded crusaders who are needed to wage a war of pornography on the enemy.

Those who would reject higher sex teachings for fruitless pornography are not the type who care to think about the biological destiny of the human race, and so it is actually best that they perish and be enslaved by their own impulses.  It is at the moment a complaint by the eugenic crowd that pornography and free sex are destroying the race, however this is because they have not yet thought to weaponize these programs as negative eugenics.  Those who can handle both pornography and higher ideals must use these industries for our own benefit, to accelerate the extinction of less sentient conscientious humans. For those who take the time to see they will notice that pornography has actually separated the wheat from the weeds, it is only when the repugnant option is also offered that we can see people's natural inclination to go for life or death, and for those who choose death, let them go. 

Pornography and free love must be taken up by the eugenicists in both forms, both constructive and destructive.  While we promote the debased despiritualized forms of this institution we must also quickly revive it in its positive eugenic forms, as in sex temples, sexual compatibility marriages and selective breeding, and the many mind and body altering forms of trantic sex.  When both are offered simultaneously, the population will be sifted by their inner qualities, the unfit will choose garbage while the fit will choose gold.  It is time for the eugenicist to admit that we cannot not salvage much or even most of the world, indeed it is a small minority of humans we must preserve and breed.  The last century has proven to us that war is an expensive program of genocide, while birth control and abortion do it for us automatically.  Pornography and free love are the last weapons of negative eugenics and the gateway to positive eugenics, these must be embraced now or never.