Make Israel Canaan gain

I have met myself and have heard many more stories of people who did not come from any recognizable Jewish background yet who felt an overwhelming sense they were Jewish. I knew of one Hatian woman who made this claim throughout her life and it was only until genetic genealogy became available to the public did she find out that this far flung possibility was actually real, she had Jewish ancestors only a few generations back which she began to investigate and she became more dedicated to her new religion. I will get back to this story in a bit.

As I child, as I was taught the Old Testament over and over again, I could not believe that the people around me did not feel the same sense of outrage that I did about how the Jews treated the once native people of what is today called Israel, the Canaanites. It also deeply aggravates me when much of the world believes that this area of the Levant is the eternal land of the Jews as this negates the histories and peoples which inhabited this nation for generations before the Jewish religion was ever invented.

The understanding of most Westerners about the Canaanites comes through the lens of the Bible. The Old Testament describes the Canaanites as an advanced and formidable people with complex cities.  They were described as being big and virile, they were mainly agriculturalists who bred fruits which were unusually large. They were pagans and it is implied in Christian and Jewish lore that they were dark or bronzed skinned.

The Bible states that the Jews were not from Canaan but were from across the Euphrates River, from a land called Ur which was likely in modern day Iraq or Iran. The founding father of the Jewish tribe, Abraham, was told by a voice that he must travel to Canaan where he and his family would eventually inherit the land, even though this nation was already thickly populated. In these early days, when it was just Abraham alone with his half-sister and wife Sarah, it would seem that there was no xenophobia on the part the Canaanites and they always accepted Abraham graciously

One time Abraham and Sarah are welcomed by a Philistine tribe who generously hosts the couple.  Abraham, the man who is intending to take this land from the Philistines, decides that it is the pagans who are not to be trusted, and for some reason he hides the identity of his wife Sarah and states that she is only his sister. Acting upon this deception the leader of the tribe takes Sarah to his bed. Even though he has been kind to Abraham and it was Abraham who had mislead the Philistine leader, the Jewish god threatens to kill this king and the curse is only lifted after Abraham prays, but not before he is showered in silver and gold.

Sarah eventually becomes pregnant, but not before she begins to grumble that he hates the Canaanites. Sarah gives birth to twin boys, Esau comes out first and his younger brother is born holding onto his brother's ankle, allowing Esau to do all the work for both of them.  Sarah has indeed named Jacob aptly as his name means to deceive.  Esau is painted as being a rugged, honest and simple man who spends his times in the field while Jacob is said to be delicate, spending his time in the camp.

Esau, being the older brother, is the heir to his father Abraham's estate; however Esau's mother Sarah prefers her son Jacob.  Through a series of intrigues and trickery, Jacob and Sarah "deceive" Jacob's brother Esau and his father Abraham into granting Jacob the wealth instead. When Jacob grows older he follows his parent's advice to not marry any of the Canaanites who have shown them nothing but kindness but to travel far away to retrieve one of his cousins.  Esau however, the more admirable brother, marries Canaanite women and intermingles with the people of the land.  Later, Esau completely forgives his brother Jacob and offer to help him, but Jacob seems to snub him.

Later, when Abraham's wife Sarah dies, the pagan Hittites offer Abraham free land where he may bury is wife. Even though the Hittites insist several times that Abraham take the land for free, Abraham stands firm with a request that he pay full price for the land. You see the Hittite's offer came with a complete spirit of giving, but Abraham does not want a gift, he wants the deed to the land; what would have been a token of friendship on the part of the Hittites is turned into a cold business transaction.  There is a similar sentiment expressed when Abraham helps the king of Sodom to retrieve his wealth from marauders; while Abraham takes his cut of the treasure before he returns to Sodom, when the king offers Abraham his reward publicly Abraham rebukes this as he does not want anyone to say that another man has made him rich! And Abraham's god always assures him that he will eventually be taking this land of the Canaanites.

Later, Jacob's daughter Dinah willingly sleeps with a Canaanite king named Shechem, Jewish legend says that she had become addicted to uncircumcised pagan penis. King Shechem shows his noble intentions by asking Jacob for permission to be with Dinah; so devious and hateful is Jacob that he conceives of a plot to take "revenge" as he says his daughter has been treated like a prostitute. Jacob pretends to welcome king Shehem and his people into their tribe, the only thing they need to do is become circumcised. The pagans agree to this offer and perform the operation in mass.  While the men are still weak and vulnerable from the procedure, Jacob and his sons storm their city, kill all the men and take the women and animals as booty, and as their god said the Jews begin to take the land.

The Jews move to Egypt for a period of time of hundreds of years but then eventually hanker to take what they believe is their birth right, Canaan, the land said to be so fertile it drips with milk and honey. When the Jewish hoard approaches the borders of Canaan, the Bible attempts to paint the pagan kings as evil for coming out to fight the Jews, for defending their own lands from invaders with the expressed intent to rob them of their property.  It is not because of respect that many of the Canaanites eventually betray their people and help the Jews to enter Canaan, it is because they are deadly fearful of the Jews who have destroyed all the pagan tribes they have encountered before them.

Now before I tell you about my "favorite" part of the Bible, my favorite as it gives us the most insight into the Canaanites, let me get back to genetic genealogy.  Before the age of twelve, after learning and reading so much about the Canaanites who were obviously persecuted by the Jews, I go this sense that somehow I was connected to them. There are many more pagan nations in the Bible to relate to such as the  Egyptians, the Assyrians and the Babylonians, but I always felt closest to the Canaanites.  As I grew I developed a fantasy that I was a Canaanite, of Canaanites descent, if not biologically than spiritually, I started telling people I was a Canaanite, it was silly.

However as I matured I eventually dismissed this feeling as wishful thinking, not matter how strong these feelings were. But then I got into genetic genealogy, and I was given several surprises.  While most of my ancestry comes from Europe I found out that I am nearly 23% Turkish, this comes from waves of Turkish immigration which came to Italy centuries ago; I'm also 5% African.  However, highlighted over the map of my genetic origins there were two regions made conspicuous by their extremely pale but still visible shading; Egypt and Israel.  Now my DNA test did not indicate any Jewish blood, so how could I have DNA coming from this regions.  While I am still not 100% certain, I think that I at least have some evidence that my intuition about being Canaanite was accurate.

So what was it about the Canaanites that made me think I was related to them in the first place?  As the Jews invade the land of Canaan they were instructed by their god to completely obliterate the Canaanite culture.  The Canaanites were polytheists who worshiped many gods and practiced idolatry in elaborate temples, an aesthetic which has always appealed to me. The land of Canaan was said to be planted with innumerable groves of sacred fruit trees, and under these fruit trees would often sit a spiritual attendant. These attendants are usually presumed to be sacred prostitutes, both male and female, who would harvest the tree's fruits for food and provide sexual services so that they could live devotional lives dedicated to the gods and learning their mysteries.

Like the Babylonians, the Canaanites united sex with worship, seeing the two as inseparable, dedicated to gods of sex like Astarte. The men of the land were obviously attracted to the sexual offerings of these religious institutions, however while among these sacred prostitutes they would be exposed to art and lore which would inform them of the land's religion.  The god of the Bible was extremely strict with the Jews, they were to destroy every single sacred tree and lay the land barren.  The male sex servants were called dogs and were immediately killed, the females were often kidnapped and forced into slavery where they were forced to shave their hair as humiliation in the hopes that they would renounce their faith and convert to Judaism.

The god of Israel also made murderous proclamations against the spiritual practices of the Canaanites.  The Bible is clear that such things as sorcery and necromancy are very real and it never denies the Canaanites their profound abilities in this regard; the Canaanites were well skilled in omens, psychic abilities, astrology and the like.  All of these gifted people were immediately put to the sword until there were none left in the land.  There is a disgusting story in the Bible where a Jewish king has become desperate for advice and so he seeks the services of a witch who is then hypocritically used by their god to relay to him the information he needs. I remember the pictures of this witch, she was always drawn as haggard, living in a hovel where she had hid herself from the Israelite genocides, it frightened and desperate expression always made me sad.

This characterization of Canaan as a land of priest craft, sex magic, advanced religious architecture, fruit tree groves and a place where both men and women were free and educated, it just spoke to me and made me extremely defensive of these whom I immediately considered my people. I have dreamed of vindicating Canaan ever since.  Jews and Christian furiously condemn the Canaanites for practicing child sacrifice, a claim which even today is not known to be true, however the Israelites of course were not only allowed to but ordered to kill their own children if they were followers or oracles of another god, but according to the Judeo-Christians this is not child sacrifice.

As I attempted to spread awareness about Canaan and the Canaanites as the original peoples of the Levant I found little enthusiasm from most.  However I did make contact with pagan groups in Israel who are seeking to restore Canaanite religion.  It is difficult to gauge just how divorced they are from their Jewish roots and my temperament would only allow me to work with the most zealous of heretics who wish to deny their connection to Israel, indeed abolishing it and returning Canaan back into the land of milk and honey which the pagans generously share with the world. While I am dreamy, most people really can't get too excited about this topic.

But seeing my DNA results, the light circle around Canaan, it prompted me to dig further and further into the question as I wondered if a serious social complaint could be brought forward about the history of the Jews in the this land and how they have demonized the name of the Canaanites to the world.  The land of Israel today takes up a region which was not only called Canaan but also Phoenicia; I remembered Phoenicia being mentioned in ancient Greek mythology as a culture similar to that of Greece and even royalty from these houses would intermarry.  Indeed, the name for the continent Europe is derived from the name "Europa", a mortal woman of Phoenician descent who was impregnated by Zeus and gave birth to the Greek King Minos of Crete.

This connection to Phenocia broadened my research and I eventually found the gem I was looking for, www.phoenicia.org.  This website is a collaboration of academics and volunteers who are mostly of Phoenician descent and one of their main objectives is to correct the misinformation which has been peddled against Canaan and Phoenicia for millennia, they are also attempting to use genetic genealogy to unite the Phoenician/Canaanite diaspora worldwide. The website also has an extremely anti-Biblical shade. Here is our aggrieved minority, the living breathing scions of the race and culture which was brutally wiped out and replaced by Israel.  Why shouldn't the Canaanites and Phoenicians be angry with the Jews, isn't Judaism the most obviously genocidal anti-Canaanite religion on earth?  Can the Jews really defend the actions which took place in the Bible which included slavery, sex slavery, kidnapping and the murder of civilians?  Why can't the Phoenicians make a claim to the land, what makes them different from any one else.

I don't know if it is a coincidence or a twist of fate, but just as there were the famous Twelve Tribes of Israel there were originally Twelve Tribes of Canaan. The Jews claim in their own texts that they came from a foreign land to conquer Canaan, and today's Palestinians are likely not Canaanites but a mixed population of Near Asians who were transferred to Palestine during Islamic religious wars and resettlements. The land belongs to neither Jews nor Muslims but pagans who were much more advanced and tolerant. The story of Canaan alone is enough to throw the discussion on Israel/Palestine into confusion and at least begin to restore the Canaanites’ names while exposing the true enemies of the land.  But why can't we dream of more than this, why can't the growing pagan elements in Israel and their allies globally begin a push for Political Canaan, if the Jews restored their stolen empire why can't we raise Canaan once again.

Ann Coulter dumps Trump and predicts end of America, will she find Tulsi and Aryanism?

Ann Coulter has been a staple of the "almost alt-Right" for decades now and is perhaps the most trusted and influential conservative polemicists in America. Coulter is known for keeping up with the pulse of America and making accurate predictions, she predicted Trump's victory earlier than almost anyone else, and she used to be his greatest fan.  However, like the electorate, Coulter has been dramatically shifting not only politically but also on her opinions about Trump. 

This week Trump made headlines and seemingly reinvigorated his base by announcing that he would call for a national emergency in order to give himself the powers and finances to build his border wall. Though this will not likely be explained to you on Fox News or any other mainstream conservative media outlet, Ann Coulter, who is a constitutional lawyer, has finally turned on Trump and is exposing his national emergency for the scam it is.  

According to Coulter, right before announcing his national emergency, Trump promised to sign into law a new compromise bill which would keep the government open, but within this bill is not only provisions for amnesty for illegal immigrants but it also makes it clear that President Trump cannot build a wall on the border under any circumstances. Coulter has been making her rounds on talk radio and has explained that the national emergency is just a rouse, that Trump knows very well that the bill he is to sign into law will rob him of these powers and this very bill will be used to block him from building the wall in the courts. Trump is purposely deceiving his own base but in his hubris he is being stupidly obvious. 

Coulter has since called Trump an idiot and has now prophesied that he not only will absolutely not be re-elected but that he has destroyed the Republican Party.  Coulter is calling for Americans to accept the fact that America is gone and simply focus on taking revenge on those who have destroyed the country, namely Trump and family. Coulter has long been understood to be a crypto-White Nationalist with fascist leanings who however kept her lips tight so as to be accepted by moderate Christian Republicans.  For all of her rhetoric on Christianity she acts nothing like a Christian and can hardly be called socially traditional. While Coulter has always been on the edge, as of late she has simply come undone and can no longer hide her true intentions, falling out with Fox News and the Republican Party, now becoming their staunchest critic. 

Coulter has a bad record with the Jews as well.  While she has seemed to be pro-Israel and pro-Jewish in the past as she was attempting to pander to her evangelical Christian readers, over the years she has become obviously more and more "anti-Semitic" in her overtones and she has definitely since the Iraq war split with the Christian Zionist lobby on continuing the wars in the Middle East which are obviously nothing more than a Christian-Jewish conspiracy to enact the end times wars of biblical prophecy. Instead she has turned her focus totally to immigration which is a dog whistle for being pro-White.  However, Coulter's reputation has protected her and instead of becoming a pariah she has become the catalyst for bringing Trump's base not only further to the alt-Right but turning them against Trump and the Christian Republican establishment as well. 

Anyone who has followed Coulter for some time, if they listen to her recent interviews, will notice that she is deadly serious about her thoughts on America, she is hopeless, pessimistic and wants blood. Coulter has always been the barometer for Middle America, and she is no friend of corporate capitalism either, her sentiments almost echo the third position. But now it is time for Coulter to go through the litmus test, however not before she is prepared.  In her sullen Coulter anticipates that the Democratic Party's favorite, Kamala Harris, she will be elected, and if that happens Coulter and all of Trump’s supporters are under very serious threat of losing their heads, literally. 

But has Coulter been too distracted by her hatred for Trump to see the rising movement for Tulsi, or does she not want to see it, that is the question. Tulsi Gabbard is the obvious people's choice for the Democratic nominee for 2020.  Tulsi became famous among the alt-Left when she left her position at the DNC to support Bernie Sanders as she accused the Democratic establishment of stealing the nomination for Hillary; Tulsi has since become the favorite of the old Bernie crowd and she will likely inherit all of his followers. However, even though she is a Democrat, Tulsi has recently become the favorite of many in the alt-Right as her positions, which are designed to attract the alt-Left, also coincide with the desires and needs of the alt-Right.  As a Hindu, Tulsi has no obligation to fulfill biblical prophecy in the Middle East and so she is vehemently and vociferously against any more regime change wars; she however has made it clear she is tough on "radical Islamic terrorism". Like Bernie, Tulsi seems to be pedaling economic nationalistic leftism, socialism with protectionism, and if she is reasonable about border security than she will definitely the be the alt-Right's woman. See my post "Why the alt-Right wants Tulsi vs Trump 2020"

But as I stated in my other article mentioned above, there is another aspect to the alt-Right’s attraction to Tulsi and that is the growing movement of Aryanism, especially among the youth.  Within the next ten years it is very possible that the growing voices of the White Right will not be from Christians but from pagans who are seeking to recapture their presumed Aryan past.  As a Hindu, Tulsi's connection to Aryan spirituality resonates with these young people, who like Coulter, have turned on Trump as he swiftly falls under the control of the Judeo-Christian and Corporate-Communist Deep State. If the young alt-Right, whom Coulter seems to secretly reverberate with, were able to tip Coulter toward Tulsi, this could create a landslide victory for the apparently more genuine Hindu political leader as Coulter would drag Middle America with her.  But has Coulter and perhaps many other leading political commentators only been cheerleading for Christianity to keep their audience?  Until now they have had to walk on eggshells, so what do they really think? Coulter can either sink with Trump's ship with her plans for revenge or she can reinvent herself a pseudo-Aryan, let's see what she does. 

Suicide Rights as both positive and negative eugenics

Recently I launched a new campaign, "Suicide Rights" (www.suiciderights.com), in which I argued for the legalization of suicide on demand.  In the extended article which you can access at the link above I argued for suicide rights based upon the triple principals of freedom, compassion, and a "new world".  To sum up of the first two, it's your life, you own it and so you should have the freedom to end it if you want; and there are countless souls who are physically and mentally tortured in this world and it would be most compassionate to let them go.  The third reason, a "new world" was a euphemism for eugenics, the reasoning of which I very softly delivered, but this is the most important reason of all and I would like to present this idea it its more straightforward version.

I recently wrote an article on why the eugenic Right needs to support abortion, especially later term abortion.  As I argued, though abortion can have a dysgenic effect if over used by the more socially minded classes, it has had a definite eugenic effect as it has reduced the overall birthrate of those who are dependent and asocial, reducing their numbers to those similar to what can be found among the more able. Late term abortion is particularly necessary as it is probably the less conscientious and cruel members of our society who would wait so long as to abort the fetus and so this is the strata who need to be most targeted. While abortion has been argued to be one of the most effective eugenic technologies of our time, it still falls within the realm of negative eugenics, the reduction of that class who are less inclined to view this science favorably, and this has been the second movement for such ends, the first being birth control.

While the eugenicists have been very successful at implementing negative eugenics they have not yet found the recipe to advance positive eugenics, the promotion of the birth of eugenically desirable classes through selective breeding and perhaps genetic engineering. In fact, the eugenically minded people of the West have come to see the one-sided program of abortion as a threat as it does reduce the birthrate of those whom they would like to see breed. It should be no surprise that Western eugenicists would be hesitant to accept yet another program of negative eugenics, which would be the overwhelming influence of suicide rights, however unlike abortion suicide rights can have an aspect of positive eugenics if properly guided and implemented. 

If suicide on demand were made legal it is obvious the vast majority of the clients would be those who are sick, old, and otherwise miserable and unproductive. Also would be the criminal classes who, perhaps rather than spending life in jail, would prefer to simply disappear.  In my essay I argued that this would more so than improve the gene pool free up financial resources for those who wish to continue with life by reducing the strains on our hospitals, prisons and welfare programs. Yet I also argued that perhaps it would have more influence in the genetic improvement of the racial stock if it was marketed to that grade of population who does not meet the extremes listed above but who suffer from more hidden psychological and socialized suffering. 

There is indeed no small number of people who have either inherited subtle mental illnesses or were poorly raised so as to be socially sick.  While the opportunity to correct these illnesses should be offered, it must also be understood that certain numbers of these people are beyond repair.  At the moment modern medicine has made it possible to treat mental illness to some degree, however this poses genesiological threat to humanity.  The borderline cases are the most dangerous as while these people may very sincerely wish to die, they are all too often forced and coaxed to live normal lives regardless, including to marry and produce children. There are plenty of people who are genetically and socially sick, who did not want a family, but who have now be straddled with one anyway, and these unfortunate individuals have a tendency to break under the strains of parenthood.  

Worse still is the sad truth that these people who originally wanted to avoid these visions must sit and watch as the mental illnesses which have destroyed their own lives bloom in their children whom become as miserable and resentful as their parents.  It is a juvenile assumption that the drug addicted and the abusive see no problem with their lifestyle, many know very well it would not only better if they never had children but to also not be a burden upon themselves, living in shame as their own unavoidable nature makes them habitually delinquent and reliant on constant assistance. The child who was raised in such circumstances in which s/he believes will lead to nothing but a life of crime a degeneracy may also be aware of this fate and sincerely wish to avoid having to not only go through this experience themselves but also negatively affect the civilization around them.  The sexual instinct is so strong that even if such persons plan not to have children they are likely to accidentally engage is this institution anyway.  Suicide rights would not only ease the pain of these contentious yet damaged people but alsp prevent their misery from being both genetically and socially inherited into the next generation. 

But how is suicide rights to be wielded for positive eugenics?  It quite clear to the vast majority of humanity that those who are frequently suicidal, but have no genetic or social injuries, these people tend to be the smartest, kindest, most industrious, creative, thoughtful and beautiful people on earth.  Verily, many people view these people as simply being too good for the world, not desiring to live among the stupid and cruel masses. It is widely perceived that currently, under the restrictions against suicide rights that these people commit suicide in greater number than the average, and so these rare gems are being lost.  How is the legalization of suicide to correct this?  

During the early days of the birth control and abortion movements these organization were run by eugenicists who directed their work toward the poor and the diseased, and to a great extent the targeting of this population has been overwhelmingly successful.  It is only in the modern era that the reproductive rights movement has been co-opted by Cultural Marxists who no longer care to implement the technology for eugenic aims and thus its implementation has become haphazard. The eugenicists who see the rational of suicide rights should learn from the birth control and abortion movement and take every step possible to insure that the suicide clinics remain firmly in their own hands. While suicide on demand would be offered to any and all who wish, the eugenicist could identify those seeking assistance who fit the description of the more ideal personality and fitness which the eugenicist is seeking but whom have become hateful of the rest of humanity with whom they cannot relate to because they are far above average. 

The thoughtful, gentle, caring, intelligent, dutiful, and idealistic person who wishes to commit suicide because they do not wish to live in the mire are those who are much more likely to understand and be attracted toward the eugenic ideology. It would be the job the suicide technician to spot these individuals and coax them into our religion. The valuable person who is now committing suicide as they must do this alone and secretly, these would be prevented from doing so if they felt comfortable going to a suicide clinic under the assumption that they will be able to end it safely and painlessly, but instead they would be conscripted by the eugenic staff to whom they are much more likely to be able relate to and resonate with on a mental and spiritual level. While suicide rights would help comb the population of those who reasonably do not want to continue, it would also treasure trove the diamonds which would otherwise be lost. Suicide rights is the first eugenic movement which will have both positive and negative eugenic effects. 

The right wing must enter and influence the abortion debate

The United States is experiencing a new tension over abortion, more so than perhaps even during the period of Roe v. Wade when abortion was made legal by the Supreme Court.  New York State, one of the more liberal states in the union, has passed a bill legalizing late term abortions up until the point of birth, what is known as a partial birth abortion where the infant is killed inside the womb and removed as one is not a citizen and has no rights until their head exits the body.  

The religious right of course takes extreme exception to this as they believe that life begins and is protected at inception while the left views this as nothing more than the extension of a woman's right to choose. However, who is missing in this debate is the pagan and atheist right who are divided and confused over the issue.  The alternative right is marked by an odd culture where it would seem they have held on to Christian morality but have dropped Jesus. The right is known for having strictly conservative social values such as family, opposition to homosexuality, hatred for "degenerate art" and often a repugnance toward women having control over their own reproduction. 

While eugenic movements began in the United States during the 1800s, the golden age of eugenics was during the interwar period where both liberal and conservative elements supported the practice.  The socialists during this time had little to no obsession with today's concepts of social justice and even flagrantly flaunted their desire to rid society of the "unfit" in order to be able to maintain a socialist state which they saw as being threatened by that class of society who would be dependent upon welfare. However, it is also obvious that fascists such as the Nazis and pseudo-fascist Japanese were also extremely interested in eugenics, sometimes for more esoteric and spiritual reasons than the atheist left. 

Today, the left is anti-eugenic as they now champion themselves as the heroes of the economically less fortunate and minorities. However the left is well aware of the skeleton in their closet, that birth control and perhaps abortion were pioneered by the most fanatical of eugenicists in the first half of the 20th century, indeed reproductive rights and eugenics were viewed as synonymous and were often overtly intertwined in their agendas. The advocates of birth control, who were mostly liberal leaning women, made it absolutely clear that more than a woman's right to choose, birth control was to target the lower classes of society. It is safe to say that without eugenics there would likely be no birth control or abortion. 

These facts are more than often voiced by the religious right in their crusade to end abortion, that the root of organizations such as Planned Parenthood lies within the religion of eugenics. Less factual but still holding grains of truth is the infamous campaigns of the American black community to smear birth control and abortion as a plot to genocide the black race, indeed abortion is one of the number one causes of death among African Americans. Then we have the disability rights groups who point out the conspicuous practice of targeting fetuses with abnormalities for abortion, and even the most radical of the left must concede that in a way this process echoes of eugenics. 

But still these voices are easily ignored as informed by pernicious dogma and misinformation and so the left easily continues their crusade for abortion as nothing more than a women's rights issue which may have had its origins in eugenics but has obviously been co-opted and mutated by the left, and it's true. The more socially conservative yet unchristian alternative right sees an enemy in the seemingly amoral and subversive culture which Planned Parenthood has become and so it is stained in their mind that abortion must be a liberal agenda which is to be opposed. The fascists are still obsessed with Hitlarian eugenics, the undisguised practice of genocide and expulsion of those people and races deemed as inferior. 

But after the failure of Nazism the once fascist right has become disillusioned with pure fascism and its social aspects, they have become more open to substituted ideas which is taking the community beyond fascism and into new realms which may not resemble the old fascism at all. The right has little interest in even hearing the ideas and arguments of the Christians, the blacks and the disabled and so they have all but missed the apparent connection between their own ideals and the ideals of the liberals of 100 years ago. But when awoken to this connection the former fascist must admit that this program of liberal eugenics has outlasted and outdone their own aspirations, abortion and birth control have championed the shrinking of the birth rate of those whom they view as their genetic enemies even though without direction.

A new concept has begun to rise in the mind of the right, that perhaps the eugenic pioneers of abortion had something going for them.  Yet they also see the consequences of unbridled birth control and abortion, the promotion of a lifestyle of senseless sex which has led to a culture of sterility and antinatalism among the grade of population they so eagerly wish they could induct; the intelligentsia, the inventive, the serious, the conscientious and the militant. However this is the fault of the right themselves as they have yet failed to understand that in order to grow the side of the spectrum which they desire they must continuously input energy into the system.  

The ideal is to create a system of more or less artificial selective breeding, humans have proven that their propensity is to engage is reproductive entropy, a recession towards the mean and not the gifted. There is no other way to bring forth the recessive qualities which the right requires without a purposeful program of selective breeding and they have not yet been able to muster the strength or intelligence to do this.  This again is the fault of their own torpid culture which seeks to only and simply re-establish the traditional system of breeding, monogamous marriage, and while this institution has its part to play in the creation of a eugenic state, it has become obvious to the farsighted logicians that this alone cannot replenish the right nor produce an unnaturally gifted race. He only sits and complains of how his ideological and racial enemies have taken advantage of the universal principle of enttopy of reproduction in its negative form.

Even now, without the confidence of any positive eugenic program, the right has not yet conceived that they themselves have the tools to not only recapture the machine of designless negative eugenics but to recruit his former enemy and even his unseen ally to his cause. There are three details which he must observe, first the vast majority of the liberals who now engage in the reproductive rights are hardly informed of abortion’s eugenic beginnings, second the average population has absolutely no reference to see this connection, and third he does indeed have invisible allies within the seemingly overwhelming leftist agenda and culture of the modern abortion movement. 

The apparatus for negative eugenics is already set up and maintained by the left, so the right need not consider at this time physically usurping their adversaries but must use their own energy against them.  The left does not want it too often brought up that they are the legatees of a eugenic legacy.  The most prominent example of this is Planned Parenthood's surreptitious distancing of themselves from their radically eugenic founder Margaret Sanger. Sanger's magnum opus was "The Pivot of Civilization" where she in no uncertain terms revealed her higher agenda for the birth control movement. Also referenced should be Alan Frank Guttmacher who not only was president of Planned Parenthood but also vice-president of the American Eugenics Society. It was Guttmacher's dedication to eugenics which pushed him to launch the Association for the Study of Abortion in 1964.

The very mention of these relations will not only make eugenics a topic of much discussion but also prick the ears of our leftist comrades. It is an ignorant belief that the opposition, deep within their subconscious, do not think of the logic and benefit of eugenics as they have been literally drenched in anti-eugenic propaganda; eugenics is not so much an enigmatic ideology but a natural desire and inclination which the left must continuously smother.  To show the liberal eugenic aspects of the beginning of their movement, this will ease the way for their psychological transformation which can only occur if this ideal is cultivated. The lives of eugenicist and birth control advocates like Maries Stopes are hypnotic as she was a more than prodigious scientist and social reformer, those who are attracted to their more popular ideals cannot help but become curious as to the other aspects of these brilliant minds. However these ideas must be presented by the right as their own program which the left unwittingly forwards.

This first step in a eugenic propaganda campaign, the co-opting of abortion for the right, this will have to be met by the left who will not be able to do anything but raise the topic of eugenics and their founders, keeping up the tempo of  its exposure. Than we have the religious right who, upon hearing of the alternative rights new found love for abortion, will only be able to take these words as further examples of their own assertions, that abortion is indeed a eugenic technology which was used and is now being used again to usher in a eugenic age.  The same applies for disability and minority lobbies.  Eugenics has a strong rational and idealistic foundation, and the more the topic is discussed, even negatively, the more this will shake the thinking of the populace at large who will be unable to escape the thought of its more rational aspects. 

The only reason the right has a phobia of abortion is because they do not have any program of positive eugenics themselves and so they unsuccessfully attack abortion as of now they see it as nothing more than a threat, at least this has been the most common reaction until recently. The right must understand that even under liberalism the abortion industry is succeeding at its cryptic eugenic agenda. And this brings us to our third point, that intuition serves us to understand that of course there are those who are involved at the top of abortion commerce who know very well the history and what they are doing and who are covertly and subtly directing the agenda from the top, and these people must be encouraged by seeing the blooming of their cause. 

The right must use the true agenda of abortion to advertise their own beliefs and presence, they must use the popularity of this agency in order to raise their profile. They need not physically interfere with the agenda as it is in their best interest for the left to continue operating this program, cloaked in benign cover, so as to continue the flow of this enterprise. As for the topic which started this essay, the question of late term partial birth abortion, the right must drop its Christian informed morality and vehemently and vociferously promote and encourage the mass legalization and implementation of this practice; instinct would serve us to understand that late term abortion would have the most eugenic effect as it is the less conscious, the unorganized, the stupid and the cruel who would wait so long as to make this decision, while of course the more noble elements of the society would clearly terminate the pregnancy earlier. It cannot also be overlooked that every community and every race would be improved by this practice and would be further encouraged to adopt eugenics as their own, it serves as the proselytization of our faith; eugenics is not limited to any one group. The alternative right must drop its impeding scruples to grab the opportunity presented before them. 

Pornography as eugenic genocide

Some time ago I wrote a post about my heroine and guru on earth, the notorious birth control advocate and eugenicist Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger's brilliant eugenic program is today hidden by the left and is unknown to the right, however it can be argued that she and she alone has had the greatest and longest lasting eugenic effect on the human race in human history. It was H.G. Wells who said  "When the history of our civilization is written, it will be a biological history, and Margaret Sanger will be its heroine."

During Sanger's time during the interwar period, eugenics was a popular topic on both the left and the right as these were more honest times and all could see that human civilization could not advance until the race itself had been reformed. However, the focus in Sanger's time was what we today call "positive eugenics", meaning the focus was on breeding healthier happier humans, rather than preventing the breeding of those who did not even desire life themselves.  The ideal was to have more children born from the upper classes and less from the lower classes.  Sanger was perhaps the only thinker of her time to see that this program, at least during her generation, would not work. 

In her magnum opus "The Pivot of Civilization" she dedicates a chapter to the concept of "cradle competition".  Sanger intelligently argued that no social program could be enacted which would encourage the more productive classes of society from breeding children in large numbers as of course their culture was not conducive to this lifestyle. In her age Sanger explained that the only way to have a eugenic effect on the population was to go from the other side, and to reduce the number of births among the dependent classes.  During the 1910's and 1920's it was not uncommon for the poorest members of society to have eight children or even more, while the shop owners and business men may have had two or three. Sanger argued that if the intelligentsia could not be given the incentive to breed more, the ratio between the haves and the have not could be evened out by providing birth control for the lower strata of society. 

By the end of WWII the positive eugenic programs of America and Europe had failed to set up any lasting breeding programs, however Sanger's birth control movement survived and grew into an international empire. Today, in the West, the better off classes still breed slowly, however their competitors at the other end of the spectrum have also seen a drastic decline in their reproduction. Even in the most impoverished and ignorant of household one can hardly ever find more than three of four children any more. Sanger's program has done its job, it has evened out the cradle competition  and has made the situation slightly more manageable for us the dedicated eugenicists. However, it is also true that birth control and now abortion have also been used by those classes which the eugenicist desires, but this is only a problem because we have not yet found the way to establish positive eugenic programs which increase the numbers of this class. 

Positive eugenics is desperately needed and needed now, however that is a topic for another post, what must be discussed now is the next step in negative eugenics, and this was accidentally discovered by the female birth control eugenicists 100 years ago.  Sanger was not the only woman eugenicist of her time, her most famous counterparts were the scientist Marie Stopes and the social reformer and political hopeful Victoria Woodhull.  These women had more in common than just their crusade for eugenics and birth control, they also saw their institution as a sexual revolution for free love. Sanger, Stopes, and Woodhull each advocated for forms of free love and female sexuality, but it resembled nothing of what we see today. Many modern socially minded people blame Sanger and her cohorts for the blatant abuse and trivialization of sex by a shallow and hedonistic generation, and yes to a great extent this is true, but this was never the intention. 

These women eugenicists did not write of free love in any passionate or licentious way, but in a constructive and almost metaphysical fashion. Sanger taught that humans could unlock their psychic potentials when they lost their inhibitions and fears, that the social cramping of the Christian era hasd mentally and physically stunted the human race.  While she advocated for all forms of disinhibition and freedom, she believed that the most disinhibiting act was to release the tensions surrounding the sex act, as sex is perhaps the most constrained and regulated behavior on earth, not to mention the one which people most desire. The idea of these female eugenicists was to not only reduce the population of those who were a burden on themselves, but to also give the higher classes access to greater brain activity and a general desire to continue life into a race of children made clean and strong through the science of eugenics.

Unfortunately for these visionaries, this is not how the vast majority of humanity has used their technology, as today sex is hardly ever advertised as a mechanism for social and personal advancement but nothing more than meaningless entertainment, there is no real higher philosophy to be found in today's sex industry, and of course the misuse and misguidance of sex has also contributed to racial decline as a childless sensualism is encouraged. The more serious minded reformers of the past century would not be pleased with the direction their movement has taken.  However, there is and will always be, a minority of persons who do see and can use the more productive side of free love, and it is time these men and women uptake their own crusade of cradle competition.

I cannot stress enough that no eugenic program, especially now, can help the human race without an intense positive eugenic aspect, we must breed a new race or perish, it is as simple as that.  However, today, like in Sanger's time, we are still crowded and choked by hoards of humanity who could care less about such endeavors and indeed have made it their business to distract the human race into sexual frivolity.  The serious reader must be aware that for millennia sex was integrated into the state and religion of pagan empires.  Babylon was famous for maintaining harems which housed sacred prostitutes who not only provided sexual services but also religious rites, and that these harems served as breeding programs from which even kings were born.  The Hindus have practiced tantric sex for centuries, the use of sex not just for gratification but to obtain higher states of awareness.  This mentality has survived in the West but only in a minority, it is the chosen few who are able and willing to channel their sexuality into higher civilizational expression. 

What is being advocated is this, yes pornography and free love has accidentally despite best intentions lead to a social and biological decline, but we must ask ourselves, what kind of people are disappearing?  The fact remains that every man and woman in the West has a choice, yes they can wrap themselves in meaningless smut, but the higher ideals of sex magic and sexual compatibility for breeding still exist. For those who object to free love you may wish to read the works of Marie Stopes as she advocated for better sexual compatibility within marriage as a means toward eugenics. The female eugenicists of the past century were the type who were mature enough to embrace sexual liberation without falling into the pit of sexual nihilism and self-destruction, and this is the stock of people we are looking for, and it is these steely minded crusaders who are needed to wage a war of pornography on the enemy.

Those who would reject higher sex teachings for fruitless pornography are not the type who care to think about the biological destiny of the human race, and so it is actually best that they perish and be enslaved by their own impulses.  It is at the moment a complaint by the eugenic crowd that pornography and free sex are destroying the race, however this is because they have not yet thought to weaponize these programs as negative eugenics.  Those who can handle both pornography and higher ideals must use these industries for our own benefit, to accelerate the extinction of less sentient conscientious humans. For those who take the time to see they will notice that pornography has actually separated the wheat from the weeds, it is only when the repugnant option is also offered that we can see people's natural inclination to go for life or death, and for those who choose death, let them go. 

Pornography and free love must be taken up by the eugenicists in both forms, both constructive and destructive.  While we promote the debased despiritualized forms of this institution we must also quickly revive it in its positive eugenic forms, as in sex temples, sexual compatibility marriages and selective breeding, and the many mind and body altering forms of trantic sex.  When both are offered simultaneously, the population will be sifted by their inner qualities, the unfit will choose garbage while the fit will choose gold.  It is time for the eugenicist to admit that we cannot not salvage much or even most of the world, indeed it is a small minority of humans we must preserve and breed.  The last century has proven to us that war is an expensive program of genocide, while birth control and abortion do it for us automatically.  Pornography and free love are the last weapons of negative eugenics and the gateway to positive eugenics, these must be embraced now or never.