Israel's ban on interfaith marriage is hypocritical, bigoted and built on genocidal hate

Today, Jews and non-Jews are unable to marry each other within the state of Israel, this is because Israel has no “civil marriage laws”. Jewish marriages are totally within the control of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and the Rabbinical Courts, and these Jewish state offices will not officiate interfaith marriages between Jews and non-Jews. Interfaith couples who wish to marry one another must leave Israel to obtain a marriage license and then re-enter the country as a married couple. Imagine if any other nation on earth did not allow Jews to marry non-Jews within their nation, this would be called hate, prejudice, inhumane and "anti-Semitic". Why is Israel allowed to practice this obvious bigotry, why is it ok for Israel to be anti-Gentile? 

But why is a modern state enacting bans on interfaith marriage? Jewish law is the answer, and it is slowly returning to Israel. The Chief Rabbinate does not only control marriages but divorce and adoption laws as well (here), and these Jewish laws (called Halakha) come from the Jewish books of the Torah and the Talmud. According to Jewish holy and legal writings, when the Jews entered the land of Canaan to steal it from the pagan Canaanites, their leader and lawgiver Moses instructed the Jews to murder the Canaanites but forbade the Jews from intermarrying with them. Prior to this, Moses has a whole tribe of Moabite women murdered because Jewish soldiers slept with them and began worshiping their gods. According to the Talmud, Jews are not to marry “heathens” or “slaves” unless they convert to Judaism. The Torah provides further condemnations of mixed marriages in the book of Ezra where the children of mixed marriages are abandoned and mixed marriages are described as “racial pollution” 

If this sort of logic were allowed to govern the state marital laws of any other nation it would be considered hate of the highest order, and it is hate of the highest order, but that is what the Jewish religion is all about, hatred for non-Jews. 

Commands Against
Interfaith Marriage In Judaism 

TALMUD: JEWS MUST NOT MARRY “HEATHENS” OR “SLAVES” UNLESS THEY CONVERT 

Will you suggest [that what is meant is]: Whether your father is told, ‘You may keep her’ or whether your father is told, ‘Let her go’. the All Merciful said, ‘She is thy sister’, to include his sister from a slave and a heathen! — Scripture stated, The father’s wife’s daughter, only she with whom your father can enter into marital relationship, but a sister from a slave or a heathen is excluded. And what ground is there for this? — It is logical to include those subject to kareth since generally their betrothal is valid. On the contrary! A slave and a heathen should have been included since on embracing the Jewish faith, betrothal with himself is also valid! — When any of these adopts the Jewish faith she becomes a different person. (Babylonian Talmud, Yebamoth 23a)

TORAH: MOSES INSTRUCTS THE JEWS TO MURDER THE CANAANITES AND STEAL THEIR LAND, BUT NOT TO INTERMARRY WITH THEM

When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you— 2 and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally.[a] Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy. 3 Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, 4 for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods, and the Lord’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you. (Deuteronomy 7:1-4)

TORAH: CHILDREN OF MIXED MARRIAGES MUST BE EXCLUDED FROM ISRAEL FOR 10 GENERATIONS 

“An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever;” (Deuteronomy 23:3)

TORAH: MOSES HAS MOABITE WOMEN AND JEWISH MEN MURDERED BECAUSE BECAUSE THEY HAD SEX AND THE JEWS BEGAN TO WORSHIP MOABITE GODS 

While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women, 2 who invited them to the sacrifices to their gods. The people ate the sacrificial meal and bowed down before these gods. 3 So Israel yoked themselves to the Baal of Peor. And the Lord’s anger burned against them. 4 The Lord said to Moses, “Take all the leaders of these people, kill them and expose them in broad daylight before the Lord, so that the Lord’s fierce anger may turn away from Israel.” 5 So Moses said to Israel’s judges, “Each of you must put to death those of your people who have yoked themselves to the Baal of Peor.” 6 Then an Israelite man brought into the camp a Midianite woman right before the eyes of Moses and the whole assembly of Israel while they were weeping at the entrance to the tent of meeting. 7 When Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, saw this, he left the assembly, took a spear in his hand 8 and followed the Israelite into the tent. He drove the spear into both of them, right through the Israelite man and into the woman’s stomach. Then the plague against the Israelites was stopped; 9 but those who died in the plague numbered 24,000. 10 The Lord said to Moses, 11 “Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, has turned my anger away from the Israelites. Since he was as zealous for my honor among them as I am, I did not put an end to them in my zeal. 12 Therefore tell him I am making my covenant of peace with him. 13 He and his descendants will have a covenant of a lasting priesthood, because he was zealous for the honor of his God and made atonement for the Israelites.” (Numbers 25:1-18)

TORAH: EZRA HAS CHILDREN OF MIXED MARRIAGES ABANDONED

And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now there is hope in Israel concerning this thing 3. Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law. Ezra 10:2-3… (verse 44) All these had taken foreign wives; but they sent them away, both the women and their children. (Ezra 10:2-3, 44)

TORAH: EZRA DESCRIBES MIXED MARRIAGES AS “RACIAL POLLUTION” 

But then the Jewish leaders came to me and said, “Many of the people of Israel, and even some of the priests and Levites, have not kept themselves separate from the other peoples living in the land. They have taken up the detestable practices of the Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, and Amorites. For the men of Israel have married women from these people and have taken them as wives for their sons. So the holy race has become polluted by these mixed marriages. To make matters worse, the officials and leaders are some of the worst offenders.” (Ezra 9:1-2)

Jews & Non-Jews Cannot Marry Inside Israel 

The Huffington Post

Israel Civil Marriage Ban Blocks
Those Not Considered Jewish From Wedding

The Media Line | By Linda Gradstein Posted: 06/12/2013

https://web.archive.org/web/20140811073945/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/israel-civil-marriage-ban_n_3429764.html

A month ago, Rita Margulis and her fiancé Amit (as a career army officer he asked not to use his last name) got married at the Safari in Tel Aviv. There was a Reform rabbi and 450 guests. But according to the state of Israel, the wedding never happened.

That is because Margulis, who immigrated to Israel from Ukraine at age 4, is not Jewish according to Jewish law, because her mother is not Jewish. Jewish law states that only someone born of a Jewish mother or who had an Orthodox Jewish conversion is Jewish. And since there is no civil marriage in Israel, anyone who is not Jewish cannot marry another Jew in Israel.

Until her wedding, Margulis says it didn’t bother her much. She grew up in Israel and became a combat soldier. After her mandatory army service, she went to university and became an economist. She never seriously considered converting to Judaism, she says, and believed she should not have to.

“Getting married is a basic right that every citizen should have,” she told The Media Line. “I’ve become active in trying to get Israel to institute civil marriage.”

Israel is both a Jewish and democratic state. The ultra-Orthodox rabbinate controls all issues of personal status, including marriage and divorce. To get married in Israel to another Jew, you must prove you are Jewish. If that is impossible, as in Margulis’s case, you cannot get married.

Thousands of couples have taken advantage of a loophole in the law, in which they fly abroad, often to Cyprus, and have a wedding there. That civil wedding is then recognized by the State of Israel and the couple is listed as “married” in Israel.

Hiddush, an Israeli-American partnership for religious equality in Israel, has launched a campaign for civil marriage in Israel.

“The right to marry is one of those universally cherished civil liberties,” Uri Regev, CEO of Hiddush told The Media Line. “It is the one area in which Israel excluded itself from the international covenant of civil and political rights. The law adversely impacts the lives of hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens who cannot marry at all because of religious coercion and of millions who cannot have a marriage ceremony which fits their lifestyle and beliefs.”

Only Orthodox Rabbis may perform wedding ceremonies in Israel. More than 70 percent of American Jews define themselves as Reform or Conservative, although these movements have failed to make major inroads in Israel. Conversions done by Reform or Conservative rabbis are also not recognized in Israel.

The issue gained traction with the immigration of more than one million people from the former Soviet Union in the 1990s. Israel’s Law of Return states that anyone with one Jewish grandparent is entitled to automatic citizenship in Israel, with all of the financial benefits that immigration entails. That classification is the same one the Nazis used during the Holocaust to determine who was Jewish.

Of the one million immigrants from the former Soviet Union, an estimated one-third, like Margulis, are not Jewish according to Jewish law. While many of them want to convert, only a few thousands have succeeded.

Regev says Hiddush is launching a campaign with American Jewish organizations to push for civil marriage in Israel. The timing is good. For the first time in decades, the ultra-Orthodox parties are not in Israel’s governing coalition.

Finance Minister Yair Lapid, whose Yesh Atid party was the big winner in the election, has repeatedly said he supports civil marriage in Israel.

"I am going to do everything in my power to make sure there will be civil marriages in Israel. The complete dominance of the Orthodox rabbis in Israel over divorces and marriages is an insult," Lapid told American Jewish leaders earlier this year.

A spokesman for the Rabbinate in Israel declined to comment. Yet in the past Orthodox leaders have said they will never allow civil marriage in Israel, and that it would split the Jewish people in two.

Proponents argue that civil marriage would solve another problem in Israel – that of husbands who blackmail or refuse to give their wives a “get”, a religious divorce. Without the “get,” women are unable to remarry. Hundreds of women are trapped in this situation and countless others have paid heavily for the “get.” A civil marriage would only necessitate a civil divorce.

Yet Regev says it will still be an uphill battle. As part of its conditions for joining the government, the Bayit Yehudi party headed by Naftali Bennett demanded and received a clause that any legislative change on religious issues requires the agreement of all coalition parties.

“That means they have veto power and they have already said they would not support civil marriage.”

Israeli and American Jews should fix their sexist divorce laws before talking about the ills of Sharia

I Oppose BOTH Shaira Law & Halacha Law!

Israel is not a Secular State as many claim, it is a Jewish State with “creeping Halacha” or encroaching Jewish law. There is no secular constitution in Israel to protect Jews and non-Jews from Halacha (Jewish law). One area where the misanthropic effects of Halacha law are most prominently seen today is in Israel’s sexist divorce laws.  According to the Talmud, a women cannot obtain a divorce without written permission from her husband (a document called a “get”); yet men can divorce women anytime they please by simply handing them their divorce note, even doing it secretly while the woman is sleeping or throwing it at her in public. Even women who are abused or abandoned cannot obtain a divorce without their husband’s permission and thus they become stuck in abusive marriages they cannot escape.  To make matters worse, Jewish men can avoid paying a women’s  kethubah  (a wife’s marriage settlement which she is entitled to recover on her being divorced or on the death of her husband) by simply humiliating her in a courtroom by describing her “physical deformities” – according to Halacha law, a woman is not entitled to her kethubah if she has moles, bad breath, scars from a dog bite, if her breasts are too far apart, if she sweats too much, or if she screams in pain during sex.  Similar misanthropic and sexist antics take place in America’s Beth Din courts (which are designated by Israel) where many Orthodox Jews feel pressured to conform to community standards and follow Halacha rulings rather than obtain a divorce in a secular court.  These religious laws open the way for Rabbis to exploit these women, extorting them for money to then beat and torture their husbands until they provide the women with their religious divorce.  

EXAMPLES OF MODERN DAY VICTIMS OF SEXIST DIVORCE RULING IN ISRAEL 

Stuck Paying Husbands Debts And Cannot Remarry

After four years of marriage, Tamar Tessler filed for divorce, taking her infant daughter and embarking on what she hoped would be a new chapter of her life. Today that daughter is 36 years old — and Tessler is still awaiting the divorce. 

Her husband long ago moved to America, said the 61-year-old retired nurse. But under Israeli law, she remains trapped in a defunct marriage that her husband won’t allow to end. She can’t legally remarry, was obligated as his spouse to repay some of his debts, and lost out on tax breaks for single mothers even though she raised their daughter alone. 

Tessler is one of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Israeli women caught in legal and social limbo because of a law that leaves matters of divorce for all Jewish citizens in the hands of a government-funded religious court. (READ MORE @ LA TIMES)

Legal Limbo for Wives

An article carried by the Jewish Bulletin of Northern California in 2002 tells how the Talmud divorce laws are playing out in contemporary America. As you read, remember that the women who suffer live on American soil.

NEW YORK — An international grass-roots organization has won the backing of major Orthodox rabbis and organizations around the world to help ease the plight of women whose husbands refuse them a Jewish divorce. Jews who live according to halachah (Jewish law) require a get to dissolve their marriages. Only a man can give a get, and some husbands withhold them out of vindictiveness or to extort financial or custody settlements. The issue has long-rankled many in the Orthodox world because of the impact on women, some of whom are trying to escape abusive relationships. Women denied gets are forbidden from remarrying or even dating, and are called agunot, which means “chained women.” (Jewish Bulletin of Northern California)

Some husbands use a legal device that enables them to be remarried while holding their wives in marital limbo

One of the biggest loopholes that has been used recently to block women from obtaining gets is the heter me’ah rabbonim, which literally means “exception of 100 rabbis.” Under the heter, a man who obtains 100 signatures from rabbis can withhold a get from his wife, but still remarry. Initially intended to be used when a wife is incapacitated, the practice has been widely abused in recent years, Klein said. ”There are people who are selling heter meah rabbonim and women who are not being given the right of getting this get.” People have been known to obtain the signatures by going to yeshivas in Israel, where no one knows the parties involved, and misleading young rabbis into believing the heter is justified. ”The bottom line is they’re keeping a wife chained as an agunah while freeing the husband,” Klein said. (Jewish Bulletin of Northern California)

AMERICAN BEN DIN COURTS DESIGNATED BY THE STATE OF ISRAEL 

According to The West Coast Rabbinical Court – Beth Din of Beverly Hills:

The Rabbinical Court of California and the West Coast, headed by HaRav Gavriel Cohen is authorized to handle all matters of Jewish religious law, and isdesignated by the State of Israel to serve the western United States, Canada, Mexico and the Far East in matters of Halacha (Jewish law). 

All traditional services of the Beit Din are available from competent and compassionate legal authorities. The validity of decisions and decrees of the Beit Din have been upheld by the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, and are recognized by both Ashkenazi and Sephardic leaders. (The West Coast Rabbinical Court – Beth Din of Beverly Hills)

MEN CAN DIVORCE WOMEN AT ANY JUST BY HANDING THEM A NOTE  CALLED A “GET”, THIS CAN BE DONE IN SECRET OR THE “GET” CAN BE THROWN AT HER 

 When a husband wishes to divorce his wife, he must serve her with a document called a Get. The Tractate Gittin enumerates unusual but legitimate methods for delivering the Get.

The Get May Be Delivered While The Wife Sleeps…

 MISHNAH. IF HE SAID TO HER, TAKE THAT BOND, OR IF SHE FOUND IT BEHIND HIM AND READ IT AND IT TURNED OUT TO BE HER GET, IT IS NO GET, UNTIL HE SAYS TO HER, THERE IS YOUR GET. IF HE PUT IT INTO HER HAND WHILE SHE WAS ASLEEP AND WHEN SHE WOKE UP SHE READ IT AND FOUND IT WAS HER GET, IT IS NO GET UNTIL HE SAYS TO HER, THAT IS YOUR GET. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Gittin 78a)

The Get May Be Thrown At The Wife From A Roof Or Up To A Roof…

MISHNAH. IF SHE WAS STANDING ON A ROOF AND HE THREW IT UP TO HER, AS SOON AS IT REACHES THE AIRSPACE OF THE ROOF, SHE IS DIVORCED. IF HE WAS ABOVE AND SHE BELOW AND HE THREW IT TO HER, ONCE IT HAS LEFT THE SPACE OF THE ROOF, EVEN THOUGH [IMMEDIATELY AFTERWARDS] THE WRITING WAS EFFACED1 OR IT WAS BURNT,2 SHE IS DIVORCED. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Gittin 79a)

A Get May Be Thrown At A Wife In Public…

A man may throw the Get at his wife. Depending on where it lands, the couple may or may not be divorced. If it lands nearer to her, they are divorced. If it lands nearer to him, they are not divorced. If it lands halfway between them, they are both divorced and not divorced.

MISHNAH. IF SHE WAS STANDING ON PUBLIC GROUND AND HE THREW IT TO HER, IF IT LANDS NEARER TO HER SHE IS DIVORCED, BUT IF IT LANDS NEARER TO HIM SHE IS NOT DIVORCED. IF IT LANDS MIDWAY, SHE IS DIVORCED AND NOT DIVORCED. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Gittin 78a)

A WOMEN CAN BE DENIED HER “KETHUBAH” (DIVORCE SETTLEMENT) IF HER HUSBAND HUMILIATES HER BY DESCRIBING HER PHYSICAL DEFORMITIES

No Kethubah for Bodily Defects…

Despite the protection of the kethubah, it is relatively easy for a husband to get rid of a wife without paying. Physical defects can justify her being divorced without receiving kethubah.

MISHNAH. … [IF A WOMAN WAS BETROTHED] ON CONDITION THAT SHE HAS NO BODILY DEFECTS, AND SHE WAS FOUND TO HAVE SUCH DEFECTS, HER BETROTHAL IS INVALID. IF HE MARRIED HER WITHOUT MAKING ANY CONDITIONS AND SHE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BODILY DEFECTS, SHE MAY BE DIVORCED WITHOUT A KETHUBAH. ALL DEFECTS WHICH DISQUALIFY PRIESTS (30) DISQUALIFY WOMEN ALSO. (31) (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 72b) 

Rev. Dr. Israel W. Slotki, Talmud scholar and translator of this section of the Tractate Kethuboth, amplifies the text with these footnotes: 

FOOTNOTE 30: From the Temple service (cf. Lev. XXI, 17ff).FOOTNOTE 31: From marriage. If such a woman married she may be divorced without a kethubah.

Bad Breath, Perspiration, Moles…

The Sages go on to discuss this Mishnah in the following Gemara, and expand the legal rulings. Other physical defects that can deny a wife her kethubah include excessive perspiration and bad breath. I have omitted the footnotes in the following. To study them, please follow the link at the end of the excerpt.

GEMARA. … ALL DEFECTS WHICH DISQUALIFY etc. A Tanna taught: To these were added [excessive] perspiration, a mole and offensive breath. Do these, then, not cause a disqualification in respect of priests? Surely we have learned, ‘The old, the sick and the filthy’ and we have also learned, ‘These defects whether permanent or transitory, render human beings unfit [for the Temple service]! — R. Jose b. Hanina replied: This is no contradiction. The former refers to perspiration that can be removed; the latter, to perspiration that cannot be removed. 

R. Ashi said [in reply]: You are pointing out a contradiction between ‘perspiration’ and ‘one who is filthy’ [which in fact are not alike, for] there, in the case of priests, it is possible to remove the perspiration by the aid of sour wine, and it is also possible [to remove] an offensive breath by holding pepper in one’s mouth and thus performing the Temple service, but in the case of a wife [such devices are for all practical purposes] impossible. 

What kind of a mole is here meant? If one overgrown with hair, it would cause disqualification in both cases; if one with no hair, [then, again], if it is a large one it causes disqualification in both cases and if it is a small one it causes no disqualification in either; for it was taught: A mole which is overgrown with hair is regarded as a bodily defect; if with no hair it is only deemed to be a bodily defect when large but when small it is no defect; and what is meant by large? R. Simeon b. Gamaliel explained: The size of an Italian issar! — R. Jose the son of R. Hanina said: One which is situated on her forehead. [If it was on] her forehead he must have seen it and acquiesced! — R. Papa replied: It is one that was situated under her bonnet and is sometimes exposed and sometimes not. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 75a)

Scars from Dog Bites, a Harsh Voice…

Scars from dog bites and a harsh voice can also trigger the divorce of a wife without her kethubah.

GEMARA. … R. Hisda said: I heard the following statement from a great man (And who is he? R. Shila). If a dog bit her and the spot of the bite turned into a scar [such a scar] is considered a bodily defect. R. Hisda further stated: A harsh voice in a woman is a bodily defect; since it is said in Scripture, For sweet is thy voice, and thy countenance is comely. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 75a)

Breasts Too Far Apart…

Having breasts too far apart can trigger the divorce of a woman without her kethubah.

GEMARA. … R. Nathan of Bira learnt: [The space] of one handbreadth between a woman’s breasts. R. Aha the son of Raba intended to explain in the presence of R. Ashi [that this statement meant that '[the space of] a handbreadth’ is to [a woman's] advantage, but R. Ashi said to him: This was taught in connection with bodily defects. And what space [is deemed normal]? Abaye replied: [A space of] three fingers. 

It was taught: R. Nathan said, It is a bodily defect if a woman’s breasts are bigger than those of others. By how much? — R. Meyasha the grandson of R. Joshua b. Levi replied in the name of R. Joshua b. Levi: By one handbreadth. Is such a deformity, however, possible? — Yes; for Rabbah b. Bar Hana related, I saw an Arab woman who flung her breasts over her back and nursed her child. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 75a)

Groom Should Have Inspected…

The Sages argue about the relative responsibilities of the father and the groom for a bride’s imperfections. Some argue he should have had his female relatives inspect the betrothed woman’s body in a local bath-house before he made his deal with the father. The woman’s body is compared to a “field that was inundated.”

MISHNAH. IF SHE WAS AFFLICTED WITH BODILY DEFECTS WHILE SHE WAS STILL IN HER FATHER’S HOUSE, HER FATHER MUST PRODUCE PROOF THAT THESE DEFECTS AROSE AFTER SHE HAD BEEN BETROTHED AND [THAT, CONSEQUENTLY, IT WAS THE] HUSBAND’S FIELD THAT WAS INUNDATED. IF SHE CAME UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HER HUSBAND, THE HUSBAND MUST PRODUCE PROOF THAT THESE DEFECTS WERE UPON HER BEFORE SHE HAD BEEN BETROTHED AND [THAT CONSEQUENTLY] HIS BARGAIN WAS MADE IN ERROR. THIS IS THE RULING OF R. MEIR. THE SAGES, HOWEVER, RULED: THIS APPLIES ONLY TO CONCEALED BODILY DEFECTS; [75B] BUT IN RESPECT OF DEFECTS THAT ARE EXPOSED HE CANNOT ADVANCE ANY VALID PLEA. AND IF THERE WAS A BATH-HOUSE IN THE TOWN HE CANNOT ADVANCE ANY VALID PLEA EVEN AGAINST CONCEALED BODILY DEFECTS, BECAUSE HE [IS ASSUMED TO HAVE HAD HER] EXAMINED BY HIS WOMEN RELATIVES. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 75a-75b)

Screaming In Pain From Sex…

The Sages discuss that Mishnah in the following Gemara. What is meant by “one who screams?

R. TARFON SAID: ALSO ONE WHO SCREAMS. What is meant by a screamer? — Rab Judah replied in the name of Samuel: One who speaks aloud [22] on marital matters. In a Baraitha it was taught: [By screams was meant a wife] whose voice [23] during her intercourse in one court can be heard in another court. But should not this, then,[24] have been taught in the Mishnah[25] among defects?[26] — Clearly we must revert to the original explanation.[27] (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 72b)

FOOTNOTE 22: Lit., ‘makes her voice heard’.
FOOTNOTE 23: Her screams of pain caused by the copulation.
FOOTNOTE 24: Since her screaming is due to a bodily defect.
FOOTNOTE 25: Infra 77a.
FOOTNOTE 26: Of course it should. Such a case in our Mishnah is out of place.
FOOTNOTE 27: That given in the name of Samuel.

RABBIS EXTORT JEWISH WIVES TO KIDNAP AND TORTURE THEIR HUSBANDS UNTIL THEY PROVIDE A GET NOTE

Four More Haredi Kidnap-Torture-Extortion Granted Bail
Reported By Failed Messiah 

The four haredi men join six others, including allegedly ringleaders Rabbi Mendel Epstein and Martin “Mordechai” Wolmark, who were granted bail earlier this week.

 

Alleged kidnap-torture-extortion gangleader Rabbi Mendel EpsteinFour More Haredi Kidnap-Torture-Extortion Granted BailShmarya Rosenberg • FailedMessiah.com 

Four more haredi men held in a kidnap-torture-extortion scheme to coerce recalcitrant Jewish husbands to grant their wives Jewish religious divorces have been granted bail, the New Jersey Star-Ledger reported. They join six others, including allegedly ringleaders Rabbi Mendel Epstein and Martin “Mordechai” Wolmark, who were granted bail earlier this week. 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert set bail at $1 million for Jay “Yaakov” Goldstein and $500,000 for Moshe Goldstein, Avrohom Goldstein and Simcha Bulmash.While bail amounts vary between $5 million and $500,000 for the first six of the 10 arrested gang members, all six were ordered into house arrest with electronic monitoring.The 10 were arrested in an undercover sting operation last week. Women were charged close to $100,000 each for the gang to kidnap and torture their husbands to force them to grant their wives Jewish divorces known as “gets” (get, singular; gittin, plural; in both Hebrew and Yiddish). 

No trial date has yet been scheduled. 

Interesting Rhode Island law allows Jews to practice incest

Also See My Site On The Jewish Talmud:
http://stopnoahidelaw.blogspot.com/

According to the Jewish Talmud, marriages between uncles and nieces are considered to be “meritorious”, it is also common knowledge that many of the Rabbis of the Talmud married their own nieces. Yet, what few people in America know is that members of the Jewish community were successful in installing an exception for themselves and themselves only into the Rhode Island marital laws which exempts Jews from any anti-incest laws which conflict with their Talmudic doctrines (i.e. uncle/niece marriage). This law has been on the books since 1764.

TALMUD CONSIDERS UNCLE/NIECE MARRIAGE “MERITORIOUS”

“Concerning him who loves his neighbours, who befriends his relatives, marries his sister’s [50] daughter… FOOTNOTE 50: This is a meritorious act, because the affection a man has for his sister will be extended to her daughter, his wife”. (Babylonian Talmud, Yebamoth 62b)

MANY TALMUDIC RABBIS MARRIED THEIR NIECES 

“On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish: marriages between an uncle and a niece. We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean … Rabbi Ishmael made a special effort to overrule his vow [not to marry his own niece] and to make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth … .” – Baron’s “A Social and Religious History of the Jews”, page 230 (Jewish Publication Society, 1952)

RHODE ISLAND LAW (TITLE 15) – INCEST PROHIBITIONS DO NOT EXTEND TO JEWS

§ 15-1-4 Marriages of kindred allowed by Jewish religion. – The provisions of §§ 15-1-2 and 15-1-3 shall not extend to, or in any way affect, any marriage which shall be solemnized among the Jewish people, within the degrees of affinity or consanguinity allowed by their religion. - http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/Statutes/title15/15-1/15-1-4.HTM

Why is it called "Palestine"? Is it Muslim, Jewish, or really Pagan?

Also See: "Make Israel Canaan Again"

Why do Palestinians call themselves Palestinians? Why does Israel say there was never any Palestine if they have a holy book called the "Palestinian Talmud"? Where did the name Palestine come from? Is it from the Bible, or is it an Islamic or Arab word? The roots of the word Palestine reveals much about the regions polytheistic past.

According to both secular and biblical scholars, the land that is now today called Israel was once called Canaan. Prior to the appearance of the Jewish religion and the Bible, Canaan was populated by many different pagan tribes who had lived on the land for generations. It was these pagan tribes who invented the language and writing system today known as Hebrew. At some point in time, these pagan tribes were replaced by biblical Judaism through a series of civilizational conflicts between the new monotheist religion and the original polytheists. Both secular and religious scholars agree that the transformation of the region from Canaan to Israel was not peaceful, though they may disagree on how exactly the transformation took place, whether Judaism evolved out of the original paganism or whether Jews were an invading tribe, the Bible says they were invaders. What we do know is that the monotheists eventually won and established a theocracy which drove out, killed or enslaved all of the original inhabitants.

One of these original pagan tribes that were invaded and eventually expelled by the monotheist Jews were called the “Philistines”. According to the Bible, the Philistines inhabited the cities of Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, and Gath; some of these names you may recognize from the modern Israel/Palestine conflict. Secular archaeology reveals that the Philistine cities were carefully planned and included industrial zones, these were highly advanced civilizations. Yet all of this was lost to the monotheist Jews after they took the land by force and instituted the laws of the Bible which drove out or enslaved the Philistine people.

Because of their Bible-based aggression and expansionism, the Jews acquired many enemies in the region, including Egypt, Babylon, and Rome. The renamed nation of Israel was attacked and destroyed by pagan Babylon in 605 BC. However, the Jews were eventually returned to the land they had taken from the Canaanites after Persia defeated Babylon some 70 years later. The region today known as Israel became part of the Roman Empire 63 BC when it was annexed after the Third Mithridatic War. When the pagan Romans annexed Israel they called it by its Jewish name of “Judea”, but after several conflicts with the Jews, the Romans completely destroyed their holy city of Jerusalem in 70 AD and sent many of the Jews out into the diaspora. After winning against the Jews, the Romans renamed the province its pagan name, “Palestine” to humiliate the Jews; Palestine is the Roman word for “Philistine”, the original pagan tribes which inhabited the region. The fews Jews who remained in Palestine wrote holy works there and so that is why they have a legal book called the "Palestinian Talmud, it was written in Palestine! 

Contrary to popular belief, the word “Palestinian” has nothing to do with Islam or Arabians. Islam did not even enter the region until almost 600 years after Rome had defeated the Jews and renamed the region Palestine. Eventually, pagan Rome was replaced by the Christian Byzantine Empire which kept the name of Israel/Canaan as Palestine. When Muslims invaded the land in 637 CE it was owned and populated mostly by Christians, not Jews. The district of Palestine eventually fell to the British. In 1917, the British signed the Balfour Declaration which gave this region back the Jews who had conquered the land first. The Jews who had not owned the land for more than 2,000 years were given a deed to Palestine because it was believed to be their biblical birthright, even though the land had originally been called Canaan and was civilized by pagans. However, the land of Palestine which originally belonged to the pagan Philistines was now populated primarily by Muslims and the British called these people the “Palestinians”. As the Jews were eager to delegitimize Muslim rule in the area they began a campaign claiming there was never any "Palestine", even though that word never had anything to do with Muslims but pagans.  Thus, Muslims Palestinians name themselves after the origninal pagan inhabitants of Canaan and Jews lie when they say their was never any palestine.

Why did the Nazis hate Oswald Spengler?

Who was Oswald Spengler and why did the Nazis hate him?  Before the Nazis hated Spengler, they stole his ideas, just as they stole the Hindu Swastika, and then they ostracized him even though he was widely known to be perhaps one of the greatest visionary historians ever to come out of Europe. Oswald Spengler became famous throughout Europe and America when in 1918 he published the first of a two-volume series, "The Decline of the West". Spengler's vision of history and his predictions for Western society were so profound that his philosophy immediately became the topic of much discussion among the politically motivated classes.  Despite the fact that the Nazis would later view his work as a basis for their own philosophy, they eventually had this genius ostracized, but why?

Spengler's theory of the rise and fall of civilization was based on an organic understanding of the human condition and so it only makes sense that his theories resemble the Hindu Yuga Cycle. Only for the outsider should any Hindu have to explain they would not take Spengler's ideas as doctrine, Spengler's views on race are a little confusing at times, but he was likely not racist, but certainly very concerned about the coming demise of his own race and its interactions with other races in this process. Spengler studied the following civilizations in coming to his theories regarding the rise and fall of civilizations: Babylonian, Egyptiac, Indic, Sinic, Mesoamerican (Mayan/Aztec) and Classical (Greek/Roman). By comparing these different civilizations, he noticed patterns and trends which transcended culture and race, he found that civilizations seem to go through predictable phases in their rise and fall, that there are predictable patterns of human behavior, religion, governance and economy which are found in each quarter of a civilization's life cycle, Spengler named these quarters Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter. Here is the general pattern of the cycle of civilization as put forth by Spengler. 

Spring: Intuition, powerful cultural creation from awakening souls, unity and abundance.

• Religion: Birth of a grand myth signifying a new conception of God. Fear and longing for the world. Earliest metaphysical organization of the world. High scholasticism.

• Art: Religious art considered as an integrated part of religious devotion. Gothic cathedrals, Doric temples. Development of Ornamental art as against the persistent, ahistorical type of Imitative art.

• Politics: Feudalism, warrior aristocracies. Division between two primary Estates: Nobility, which is the estate proper, contains within itself the highest aspirations of its race and is therefore symbolic of the particular people in question, as well as being representative of Time in the sense of Directedness and Destiny; and Priesthood, which is the anti-Estate, pursuing eternal Truth and attempting to subordinate Blood to Intellect primarily through asceticism, but also through scholasticism.

Summer: Maturing consciousness. Earliest urban-civil society and critical thought.

• Religion: Reformation: revolt of the religious moderates against the early religion. Beginnings of a purely philosophical movement. Contrasting idealistic and realistic systems. Mathematical breakthroughs leading to a new conception of the world. Rationalism. The depletion of mysticism from religion.

• Art: Development of high artistic traditions. Both artistic medium and style express the fundamental nature of the soul of the culture. Struggle between different artistic mediums, representing the culture's striving to discover its proper mode of self-representation.

• Politics: Absolutist states. Conflicts between aristocracy and monarchy. The political centre shifts from castles and estates to the cities.

Autumn: Urban rise. High point of disciplined organizational strength.

• Religion: Faith in the omnipotence of rationality. Cult of Nature. The height of mathematical thought. The last idealists. Theories of knowledge and logic.

• Art: Fulfillment of high artistic potentials of culture- sculpture in Greece, contrapuntal music in the West. At the beginning of Autumn, art possesses complete freedom to manifest the Destiny-vision of a people through its particular perfected formal technique. However, the end of Autumn witnesses the exhaustion of the possibilities of that technique, leading to craft-art in imitation of the great style as well as artistic revolt.

• Politics: Struggles between the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie. Revolutions. Napoleonism.

Winter: Coming fissure in the world-urban civilization. Exhaustion of mental organization strength. Irreligiousness rises.

• Religion: Materialism: Cults of science, utility, and luck. Ethical-social ideals: philosophy without mathematics, skepticism. The last mathematical thinkers. Decline of abstract thinkers, and the rise of specialized academic philosophy. Spread of the last ideas.

• Art: End of symbolic art. All art becomes meaningless subjects of fashion.

• Politics: Democracy, the rule of the rich, followed by caesarism and bureaucracy.

Even though Spengler attempted to come up with an a-cultural model for understanding the signs of a civilization's rise and fall, he also came to the logical and obvious theory that this civilization cycle does have unique traits in each society which depend upon the nation's race, general philosophy of life, and how entrenched the particular culture is. Spengler described Western civilization as a "Faustian" civilization". "Faust" was a fictional character who sold his soul to the devil for power, but ends up unable to use that power for any great purpose. Spengler believed that the West had sold its soul to "technics", that it had developed massive technology to gain power but failed to adequately use this power, and even though the West understands it's technology is a major factor in its demise, they will not correct this measure, they meet the future with an accepting pessimism and condemn optimism and philosophical innovation as weakness since this would show that their original ideals were flawed, and so the West will willingly and knowingly drag themselves and their children down into the mud to die with their inventions. 

Spengler wrote a truncated version of his theory in a book entitled "Man and Technics" in which Spengler predicts that the West will slowly die among his technology but will develop sickeningly self-deceiving philosophies to ease their minds as they slowly disappear, they will use their advancements to retreat from the world and cocoon themselves as other races take their technology, they will advance their own demise by shunning hard politics and science. Spengler wished that his work would turn one philosopher into a politician or one theologian into a scientist, he begged the West not retreat from the world they had created by simply changing their world view so that they could pick up their technology and use it to move into a new civilization, he wanted to break the cycle of rise and fall, rise and fall. 

Many Hindus will likely see similarities between Spengler's ideology and that of Hinduism, most specifically our understanding of the Yuga Cycle and our eternal struggle to understand it and guide it, using wisdom to move to a higher cycle rather than having to learn another round of hard lessons as the current cycle brings us back down. Many Hindus believe we are now in the Kali Yuga, the Winter in Spengler's terminology. Descriptions of these eras exist in our Puranas and are summed up below. Hindus have the idea of the Kalki, a savior of sorts who incarnates in the Kali Yuga to destroy it and usher in a golden age.  Kalki has the qualities that Spengler hoped to inculcate in Western society, Kalki does not come to save or to teach, he comes to chastise and destroy, if the truths of the world have not become obvious to you by the end of the cycle, you are not worth saving and are to be recycled back into the universe. Now, this does not have to be a real person or event, many Hindus interpret this to be a general way of thinking that overtakes humanity, they naturally become tired of stupidity and ignorance. According to the Kalki Purana, even Buddhists are wiped out as they have fallen into a cult of personality and have accepted a philosophy of inaction, the opposite of what Krishna taught. 

Satya Yuga (also known as Krita Yuga "Golden Age"): The first and best Yuga. It was the age of truth and perfection. The Krita Yuga was so named because there was but one religion, and all men were saintly: therefore they were not required to perform religious ceremonies. Humans were gigantic, powerfully built, honest, youthful, vigorous, erudite and virtuous. The Vedas were one. All mankind could attain to supreme blessedness. There was no agriculture or mining as the earth yielded those riches on its own. Weather was pleasant and everyone was happy. There were no religious sects. There was no disease, decrepitude or fear of anything. Human lifespan was 100,000 years and humans tended to have hundreds or thousands of sons or daughters. People had to perform penances for thousands of years to acquire Samadhi and die. 

Treta Yuga: Is considered to be the second Yuga in order, however Treta means the "Third". In this age, virtue diminishes slightly. At the beginning of the age, many emperors rise to dominance and conquer the world. Wars become frequent and weather begins to change to extremities. Oceans and deserts are formed. People become slightly diminished compared to their predecessors. Agriculture, labour and mining become existent. Average lifespan of humans is around 1000-10,000 years.

Dvapara Yuga: Is considered to be the third Yuga in order. Dvapara means "two pair" or "after two". In this age, people become tainted with Tamasic qualities and aren't as strong as their ancestors. Diseases become rampant. Humans are discontent and fight each other. Vedas are divided into four parts. People still possess characteristics of youth in old age. Average lifespan of humans is around a few centuries. 

Kali Yuga: The final age. It is the age of darkness and ignorance. People become sinners and lack virtue. They become slaves to their passions and are barely as powerful as their earliest ancestors in the Satya Yuga. Society falls into disuse and people become liars and hypocrites. Knowledge is lost and scriptures are diminished. Humans eat forbidden and dirty food and engage in unrestrained sinful sexual practices. The environment is polluted, water and food become scarce. Wealth is heavily diminished. Families become non existent. Average lifespan of people is barely 100 years, though, by the end of the Yuga, it will be as low as 20 years.

So why did the Nazis eventually outcast Spengler, even though he was a great influence upon their ideology and movement?  The Nazis took up Spengler's call and refused to slip into passive philosophy to escape the doom of their technological civilization, they instead asserted the "will to power" and made an effort to forge forward into a new race and new civilization, to find the strength to move forward into nihilism but maintain the will to live as godmen. However, unlike in Hinduism where we have the developed and tested system of Vedanta to help us become empowered nihilists, the Nazis had no such tradition as their ancestral knowledge had been wiped out by Christianity, and even this at its height was likely a diminished form of the Eternal Religion, at least in comparison to Hinduism.  So what did the Nazis go on, what was the power of the mind that would help push them past the inevitable decline of the West and forge forward with their technology into a desirable nihilist epic?

The Nazis have always mistaken Hinduism and the Arya tradition as "irrationalism", as an escape from the hard knowledge which had ensnared their civilization and was hurling it to its doom. The Nazis drank the snake oil of charlatans such as Madame Blavatsky, a "spiritualist" who traveled to India, stole Hinduism and perverted it for Western usage. Blavatsky simply took Hinduism and sandwiched it between an absurd and mystical past evolution of the human race, and a future where Hinduism has evolved into a new set of "root races" who practice a religion that is a confusion of Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Western occultism; she called her false religions"Theosophy". These ideas and even science fiction were where Nazis drew their inspirations, no different from today's Alt-Right comic book junkies. The Nazis believe in only the outer veneer of mythology, looking solely for physical truth in it, some lost civilization, they have no understanding or even desire to think of their mythology or Hindu mythology or any mythology from a conceptual standpoint, as Vedanta, as a way to exercise the mind so it can better manipulate the universe. And like the Jews, they have made a particular race or tribe or nationality the center of creation, in this case "Whites".

Many Hindus understand that in the Kali Yuga even Hindus will engage in the lowest forms of superstition because they cannot understand the abstract meaning behind allegories and images.  We know from scripture that this is a disease that infects the mind in the Kali Yuga as the intelligence of humans quickly diminishes.  The Kali Yuga is broken when humans are once again able to see the deeper mind-science truths inherent in "myth", the link between the power of the mind and the ability to manifest it in the sensate universe; when Hinduism can be understood rationally and experientially without the philosopher becoming egotistical, this rather than a literal interpretation of a golden irrational age of the god-men. The Nazis have demonstrated then and now that they are incapable of truly comprehensive and naturalistic ethics, they have degraded into not only irrationalism but egotistical irrationalism. What is a race?  Is it not simply a welling up of the Brahman into an Atman that is best suited for its place and time?  How is it that both Spengler and the Puranas can predict future human behavior and actions? Because they both have a scientific view of the evolutionary process, how races evolve and their destiny becomes obvious when the mechanism of this process is known, in Hinduism all "saints" are really scientists. Nazis do not try to predict the coming future and move around it, they believe in the "will to power", they believe they can create anything, any absurdity out of their video games, it's not natural, it's not logical and it is not science... it's not Hinduism.

But the Nazis did not want scientists or Hindus, nor do they want them today.  Why did the White race appear in the north of Europe?  Why didn't they appear on the savannas of Africa, why not the rain forests of South America?  Nazis believe there is something unique in their race, as if their race is outside the natural order, as if their abilities and impulses have not been crafted by the universe in which they live, as if they are not being molded to fit their environment.  Could the White race even survive if placed in the deserts of Arabia?  Even if they attempted to maintain their whiteness through selective breeding, isn't it possible they would be so maladapted to the environment they would not even want to live, or perhaps even despite their best efforts their physiology and psychology would change over time? Why can't the White race be an adapted race, why does it need to be a superior race? Nazis want to maintain the "mystery" of their blood, a mystery they will never allow to be solved through debate because that would shatter their unstable power structure.

Why did the Nazi's outcast Spengler? Why did the Muslims and Christians outcast the pagans? The Nazis like the Christians and Muslims have a prophet, Hitler, they more or less have a Bible, Mein Kampf, and they have a "One True God" of blood mystery. Hinduism has always been distinguished by its lack of prophets, its lack of any founder, and its lack of dualism, it is descended from the essence of the universe going back to time unknown,. With the expanse of the universe, how could one prophet ever know all things for all times and for all people?  Nazism is anything but an organic culture, organic culture has sages of the age who improve the flow of knowledge from the past and push it into the future, but because Europe was never sound enough in the first place it lost its past to Christianity and so they feebly attempt to recreate an entire civilization and ethic from the minds of a few men.  Oswald Spengler saw through Nazi foolishness, and called out their stupidity.

Spengler's ostracism in Germany and the eventual banning of his works came around 1933 with the publishing if his "Hour of Decision" where he never mentioned Hitler or the Nazis but simply decried the erosion of quality politics in his age, the poisoning of sound ideas with fanaticism, leaders who thought and felt the product of the masses rather than sound ideology, strong men and demagogues who delivered the chaotic and unprincipled demands of the people rather than guiding the nation on any tried and true principles of governance and economy. Spengler called fascism the idea of the "city mobs" and implied that this was propped up in Germany with the delusional propaganda that the Nazi party could either ignore the world or oppose it; that they were demi-gods, men outside of nature, fact disdaining idealists full of hubris, men drunk on the "mystery" of their own blood. Spengler may have believed in a racial component of history, but he was no occultist, his assertion that "race purity" was "grotesque" was likely just another euphemism for Spengler's disdain for Nazi race mysticism and claims of superiority. Spengler had studied civilizations of every race and had found underlying patterns, race only determined the more perceptible realities, but there was a deeper naturalistic power moving the destiny of each race, Spengler asked the West to understand the power that animated them and direct this power, but the Nazi's escaped into fantasy and believed themselves to be above the power, the creators of the power.

Spengler and the Totalitarians 

Kogan, Steven - Brussels Journal

 in The Hour he warned the nation that in revolutionary times such as Germany was now facing, "Sound ideas are exaggerated into self-glorification by fanatics," and a leader who "thinks and feels as a product of the mass" will be treated by history "as a mere demagogue." Hitler's anonymous presence in the work underscores Spengler's view of his character and political origins, for, during the postwar crisis of the 1920s, all sides were thinking and feeling "as a product of the mass." As Spengler saw it, Germany was bent on finding a strong-man to satisfy its chaotic and unprincipled demands: "Everyone wrote to tell his future dictator what to do. Everyone demanded discipline from other people, because he was incapable of disciplining himself."

In a lecture delivered in Hamburg in 1929 titled "Germany in Danger," he warned of the nation's perilous position at home in a revolutionary time, and in The Hour he expanded his warnings to include internal and external threats to the west itself. His clarity and prescience are evident on the very first pages of the book, in which he makes a brief but comprehensive judgment about the destructive nature of Germany's National Socialists: their mania for propaganda and persecution and dangerous illusion "that they can afford to ignore the world or oppose it," thus bringing the nation to the point where "We stand, it may be, close before a second world war." 

In point of fact, no twentieth-century thinker could have been further from Orwell's ungodly crew than Oswald Spengler and nowhere more emphatically than in The Hour of Decision (1933), in which he described political discourse in his time as "superficial," "small-minded," and filled with "absurd catchwords" in place of judgment and long-range understanding. Although he thought that Mussolini had certain political gifts that might come to fruition, he noted that fascism "had its origin in the city mobs" and that Mussolini's international project for "the combating of Bolshevism . . . arose out of imitating the enemy and is therefore full of dangers." As for Hitlerism, Spengler had contempt for the Nazi belief in "race purity" and called the term "grotesque." 

Like, true scientists, Hindus have always welcomed debate, there has never been any fear of questioning or dissent.  But Nazism is like Islam, Hitler was a prophet and his blood mystery doctrine could not stand any criticism or inquiry because like Islam it was a doctrine not of nature but the product of the mind of one man, a man of the Kali Yuga, a man bereft of any organic culture, a post-Christian man who only had his ego and his comic book religion upon which to build his empire. The Nazis acted like Muslims, threatening Spengler, accusing him of heresy against their prophet, removing him from mainstream society and striking fear into those who would defend him.

Spengler and the Totalitarians  

Kogan, Steven - Brussels Journal

The Hour of Decision alone held dangers for its author. As one ardent Nazi follower wrote to him, "Like almost all of us young Germans, I have rejoiced in this year of Hitler's leadership, and it surprises (not to say shocks) us that you do not mention this man at all in your book, and obviously seem to regard him as a quantité negligeable." Apparently, Gunther Gründel also resented being treated as a minimus by the renowned historian, since he ends his letter by noting that Spengler did not reply to "my polite congratulations on your fiftieth birthday or the dissertation I once sent you" and that he will regard himself "as having a free hand" if Spengler does not respond. In a note on this threat, Helps observes that "Spengler did not answer this letter" and that Gründel subsequently attacked him in print. Coupled with Gründel's vulgar display of self-importance and mock politesse was the unspoken accusation that Spengler was not only a traitor but an apostate as well. As Gründel remarked, Spengler had spoken in The Decline and again in The Hour of an "organic transition from the era of the masses to aristocratic Caesarism," yet The Hour nonplussed him, since Spengler did not proclaim National Socialism as the destiny that Gründel said his "logic demands."

After the publication of The Hour, public attacks against Spengler were followed by censorship of the work and the banning of his name from the German press. Refusing to participate in the Nazi debasement of German thought, Spengler broke with the Nietzsche Archive in 1935 and with its presiding figure, Elizabeth Förster-Nietzsche, who, to her "great grief," was "informed that you are taking an attitude of strong opposition to the Third Reich and its Führer, and that your departure from the Nietzsche Archive, which sincerely reveres the Führer, is connnected with this." She goes on to say that she has "experienced your speaking with great energy against our highly honoured new ideal," and, in his introduction to Arthur Helps' edition of Spengler's letters, A. M. Koktenek remarks that Spengler's "repugnance" to Hitler dates "from the days of the Munich Putsch in 1923," that "one is struck by the fate that befell so many of Spengler's correspondents," and that it is an open question "whether Spengler, if he had lived longer, would have escaped from Hitler's executioners. His connection with many proscribed men involved the death penalty."

Spengler's public life ended soon after the appearance of The Hour, which was also the moment of Hitler's triumph. He continued to maintain his scholarly contacts and pursuits, and more than one person must have remarked, as a Prince Pückler did in a letter to Spengler, that there was "now in public an incomprehensible, anxious, silence" about his works, "which are nevertheless to be found in every house that I know." 

No one is stating that Spengler was a morally infallible philosopher, however, his insight into the rise and fall of nations, the root causes for this, these were so profound that not only did the Nazis find them worth stealing, as they steal everything, but his vision has remained respected even today. Spengler was certainly a prophet, but not a prophet in the terms of Islam or Nazism, Spengler was a scientist-prophet, a man who sought to intuit the mechanisms behind world events, and he intuited the weakness of Nazism. Just as all the prophets and religions of the Kali Yuga have done before him, Hitler and the Nazis simply co-opted the works of this pagan seer and then disposed of him so they could fester in their self-centered vision which could only be maintained through the most disingenuous illogic guarded by animalistic barbarity.  In Spengler's vision of the rise and fall of civilization, the Hindu can likely see their own organic doctrine of the Yuga Cycle, in Spengler himself maybe the diluted version of our own seers. There is no way to ever make ourselves useful to these fascists, they are inferior and will hate the competition, and so we must destroy them before they destroy us.

Don't trust Hitler's anti-Judaism, it's suspiciously misguided

April 20th will be Adolf Hitler’s birthday and unfortunately, counter-Zionist internet boards will be humming with his praises.  This ignoble veneration should come as no surprise though since, at the moment, the counter-Zionist movement is thickly populated by a caliber of people who are as asinine and completely Judeo-illiterate as Mr. Hitler was himself.  Just like the ramblings found in Mein Kampf and Nazi ideology, the counter-Zionist movement is currently choked with absurd conspiracy theories and false assertions that Jews are some sort of race, yet conspicuously absent is any real understanding or assessment of the Jewish religion and its doctrines. As a serious student of Judaism and Zionism, I find any praise for this benighted figure and his movement to be not only dangerous to the cause but also revolting. This man did nothing but cast dishonor and shame onto true counter-Zionism and set the movement back 100 years, he was also the catalyst for the ushering in of the Zionist State of Israel. Though it will take an entire century of hard work to undo all the damage this man and his party have done, this short article seeks to explain why Hitler must be beheaded and killed once and for all if counter-Zionism is to progress and the Jewish religion be defeated.

Hitler Had No REAL Criticism of the Jews

The first issue I take with Mr. Hitler’s polemic against the Jews is that in his entire book Mein Kampf he makes no references to the damning anti-Gentile doctrines found throughout the Talmud (and if he was brave he could have also referenced the Torah). Indeed, a search of his book shows no reference to the Talmud save one, and his analysis of it is hardly condemning in any effective manner.  With the Talmud’s doctrine of world domination under the Noahide Laws (here), with its constant reference to Gentiles as donkeys, with its many provisions for stealing from, lying to (Kol Nidre) and even killing non-Jews, Mr. Hitler chooses to complain about the Talmud’s focus on the here and now… the same could be said about the Constitution of the United States! Surely a truly learned and serious opponent of Judaism could have come up with a better criticism of the Talmud than this. But you will soon see that Mr. Hitler had no understanding of the Jewish religion, indeed he didn’t care to know anything about Judaism, his disdain for Jews was not based on the relevant facts but on his own ignorance, the same is true for his admirers who are poisoning the counter-Zionist movement today.

“Indeed, the Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world.” – Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race

Hitler Preferred Conspiracy Materials: “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” 

Perhaps Mr. Hitler’s lack of reference to any real source materials in his criticism of Judaism could have been forgiven as simply a sign of his inerudite personality, however, he himself eradicates all such sympathy when he descends into praising useless conspiracy theories as the source of his anti-Jewish ideology.  In the fight against Judeo-Zionism, the only sin greater than not referencing Jewish materials is referencing obviously faked and forged documents which do nothing more than subject the movement to justified ridicule. Anyone who knows anything about counter-Zionism knows that the Jews LOVE it when you reference “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” since it is obviously a fraudulent document and has no link to actual Jewish scripture.  As a supposed enemy of Judaism, Mr. Hitler would have known this, but instead of avoiding this trap he takes the bait with a suspicious impetuousness, praising a document which would obviously bring his movement into well-deserved disrepute. Couple Mr. Hitler’s use of glaringly bogus materials with his avoidance of using real sources such as the Talmud and the true counter-Zionist becomes very leery of the genuineness of Mr. Hitler’s argument and intentions.

“To what an extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a forgery, the Frankfurter Zeitung moans and screams once every week: the best proof that they are authentic. What many Jews may do unconsciously is here consciously exposed. And that is what matters. It is completely indifferent from what Jewish brain these disclosures originate; the important thing is that with positively terrifying certainty they reveal the nature and activity of the Jewish people and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. The best criticism applied to them, however, is reality. Anyone who examines the historical development of the last hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at once understand the screaming of the Jewish press. For once this book has become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken.” - Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race

Hitler Was Not Interested In “Anti-Judaism”, Only Racism 

See: Jews are not a race, "anti-Semitism" is a lie
See: If Jewish Blood, Then Christian Blood

Nothing reveals Hitler’s shallow and common mentality and lack of understanding of the Judeo-Zionist problem more than his own admissions that he took no issue with the Jewish religion but only became “anti-Semitic” after he came to the false conclusion that Jews are a race.  Notice from the passage below that previous to formulating his erroneous belief that Jews are a race, he took no issue with Jews and actually rejected ideology based attacks on them.  If Mr. Hitler had done his due diligence, if he had taken the true warrior’s motto of “know thy enemy” seriously, then he would have known that it is the doctrines of the Jewish religion that is the problem, not some made up Jewish racial threat.  Instead, according to his own words, Mr. Hitler followed a code of blind tolerance, accepting other ideas and religions without knowing anything about them.

“I cannot maintain that the way in which I became acquainted with them struck me as particularly pleasant. For the Jew was still characterized for me by nothing but his religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I maintained my rejection of religious attacks in this case as in others.” - Mein Kampf, Chapter II: Years of Studying and Suffering in Vienna 

It was only after Hitler came to believe for absolutely no reason that Jews are some sort of race that he began to dislike and disdain them because they were not “German”. Hitler could care less about what was going on inside people’s minds or what their ideology taught them but was only concerned whether or not they were of his nationality, yes this is the definition of blind and stupid bigotry.

“Yet I could no longer very well doubt that the objects of my study were not Germans of a special religion, but a people in themselves; for since I had begun to concern myself with this question and to take cognizance of the Jews, Vienna appeared to me in a different light than before. Wherever I went, I began to see Jews, and the more I saw, the more sharply they became distinguished in my eyes from the rest of humanity. Particularly the Inner City and the districts north of the Danube Canal swarmed with a people which even outwardly had lost all resemblance to Germans” - Mein Kampf, Chapter II: Years of Studying and Suffering in 

After coming to his stupid and unsubstantiated  ”Jews as a race” conclusion, Hitler begins to criticize the “anti-Semitism” of other German movements because they chose to focus on ideology rather than race.  Yes, those who actually took the time to understand the Jewish religion and criticize it for what it is rather than slip in fantastical racialism and the most simpleminded xenophobia, these are the people who Hitler chose to attack, those who could have actually done something to awaken the non-Jews to the threat of Judeo-Zionism through a proper understanding of the enemy.

“The anti-Semitism of the new movement was based on religious ideas instead of racial knowledge. The reason for the intrusion of this mistake was the same which brought about the second fallacy” - Mein Kampf, Chapter III: General Political Considerations Based on My Vienna Period

“The Pan-German movement was right in its theoretical view about the aim of a German renascence, but unfortunate in its choice of methods. It was nationalistic, but unhappily not socialistic enough to win the masses. But its anti-Semitism was based on a correct understanding of the importance of the racial problem, and not on religious ideas. Its struggle against a definite denomination, however, was actually and tactically false.” - Mein Kampf, Chapter III: General Political Considerations Based on My Vienna Period

Hitler’s Lies: Jews Are A Race, Not A Religion

As if Hitler had not done enough damage already, he actually goes so far as to promote obvious lies about Jews not being a religion at all (totally absurd) but ONLY a race.  Again, if Hitler actually wanted to inform himself about this issue all he had to do was consult the religious scriptures of the Jews and he would have come to see that Jews are absolutely not a race at all but a religion.  

“On this first and greatest lie, that the Jews are not a race but a religion, more and more lies are based in necessary consequence” - Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race

Hitler also tries to assert that Judaism focuses on blood purity rather than on religion. Again, he obviously knew nothing about his enemies since the Talmud makes many provisions for marrying converts and considers the children of converts to be Jews.  

“The Jewish religious doctrine consists primarily in prescriptions for keeping the blood of Jewry pure and for regulating the relation of Jews among themselves, but even more with the rest of the world; in other words, with non-Jews” – Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race

So, in conclusion, we can see the logical reasons why Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party have become the bane of non-Jew's existence and the greatest boon the Jews ever had.  Hitler’s crooked and unfounded theories still plague the counter-Zionist movement today, clogging up the path and obstructing the flow of the real knowledge that we need to defeat Judaism once and for all.  So long as Hitlerian logic persists, we will be stricken with all the maladies of ignorance, leaving ourselves wide open to attack by the Jews and their willing servants (the Noahides).  If we are to win this fight against Judeo-Zionism we must kill Hitler and the Nazi ideology once and for all and equip ourselves with the wisdom we need to win this battle, and that is simply knowledge of Judaism itself.  Judaism can only flourish in darkness and ignorance, ingredients which Hitler gave them in plenty.  But now we must focus in finding the cure, and there is only one cure for Judeo-Zionism, the light of truth!