Claire Khaw is a YouTube personality and ideologue who espouses an ideology which she has created called "Secular Koranism". Claire describes her ideology as "Sharia as defined by me". Secular Koranism is based on the premise that Sharia Law should only be interpreted from the Koran alone and should not use outside sources like the Hadith or other texts. Claire also wishes to believe that "Secular Koranism" is Noahide compliant because some Jews say Islam proper is Noahide compliant and so Jews would giver he ideology a seal of approval and allow her to spread Secular Koranism without impingement. However, according to Claire, unlike mainstream modern Islam and the Noahide Laws, the Koran does not specifically mention the death penalty for homosexuals, idolaters and blasphemers, and so Secular Koranism would not meet the minimal standard requirements to be Noahide compliant. Claire even states that under her rule she would interfere in any Noahide court trying to implement the death penalty for these offenses. This would be a hard blow for Claire as she has worked very hard to make it seem as though her Secualar Koranism and Noahide Law are interchangeable, but they are not. Unlike mainstream Islam which has blasphemers, idolaters and homosexuals killed, thus in compliance with the Noahide Laws, Claire could find herself beheaded for spreading this heresy.
Saturday, December 21, 2019
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Is Milo Yiannopoulos compliant with the Noahide Laws and a Jewish supremacist?
See Part 2 On Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
See Part 3 on Milo's descent into Noahidism (here)
See Part 4 On Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
See Part 4 On Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
See Part 5 on Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
See Part 6 On Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
See Part 7 On Milo's Descent Into Noahidism (here)
Milo is a man who needs no introduction, but to understand this issue you are going to have to learn a little bit about the Seven Noahide Laws. In 1991 congress passed a bill (here) which stated that the Noahide Laws were the basis upon which the American nation was founded, that it is America's responsibility to educate the populous about the Noahide Laws, and that in the future the President of the United States will sign an international agreement with other national leaders pledging to use education and charity to return the world to the Noahide Laws. The United Nations has also released a proclamation stating the Noahide Laws are "obligatory" (here). The Vatican states that the Noahide Laws "supersede individual freedom" (here). Freemasonry is said to be a Noahide organization (here) and many in the Islamic world are stating that Sharia Law and Noahide Law are compatible (here & here). The Zionist government of Israel and Netanyahu are officially involved in Noahide evangelism (here) and there are many "converts" to the Noahide Laws globally (here). So what are these Seven Noahide Laws?
Noahide Law is a set of Jewish Laws which comes from the Talmud that do not apply to Jews but to non-Jews only. Here is what the Seven Noahide Laws demand:
1. No Idolatry (this includes a ban on Christianity [here])
2. No Blasphemy (of the Jewish god, blaspheming other gods is ok)
4. Do not steal (Jews may steal from non-Jews however [here])
5. Do not murder (Jews may murder non-Jews however [here])
6. Do not eat the limb cut form a living animal (this prohibits lab cloned meats [here])
7. Set up courts of "justice" to enforce the above seven laws
- BEHEAD THOSE WHO DO NOT COMPLY
Anyone can see that these Noahide Laws which are made for non-Jews are unacceptable. They limit freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of sexual expression on pain of death. Further a two-tier legal system is created where Jews are given preferential treatment. For examples a non-Jew can be executed upon the testimony of one witness (no innocence until proven guilty) and they may be condemned to death upon the ruling of one judge; Jews however must have two witnesses to their "crime" and are afforded many more judges to deliberate their case. Another example is that non-Jews are executed for stealing the smallest denomination of coin while Jews must steal more to be sentenced to death. For more information on the Noahide Laws please visit my blog STOP NOAHIDE LAW (here).
What kind of person, Jew or Gentile, would accept or tolerate such laws? How did these laws slip into federal legislation and the United Nations? Why is the Vatican and the Muslim world proclaiming them and what is Freemasonry's involvement? There is obviously a plot afoot to enact these laws globally and it is backed by all of the most powerful people in the world. So what does Milo and his entourage think about the Jewish Noahide Laws? Luckily I was able to find out as recently I challenged Milo to a debate on the Noahide Laws. My premise was that Milo had to explain his position if he were going to continue to be a pubic face for the dissident right, naturally the people have the right to know Milo's (who is half Jewish) position on the issue. Upon challenging Milo to a debate on the Noahide Laws I was banned from texting in the group and his admin gave the reasons why. He said my "Noahide concern" was a "troll" and that discussion of the Noahide Laws was not acceptable for the group or "or elsewhere". Milo must have read my challenge to him on the Noahide Law as he responded and told me I was less interesting than his husband's cock.
What kind of person, Jew or Gentile, would accept or tolerate such laws? How did these laws slip into federal legislation and the United Nations? Why is the Vatican and the Muslim world proclaiming them and what is Freemasonry's involvement? There is obviously a plot afoot to enact these laws globally and it is backed by all of the most powerful people in the world. So what does Milo and his entourage think about the Jewish Noahide Laws? Luckily I was able to find out as recently I challenged Milo to a debate on the Noahide Laws. My premise was that Milo had to explain his position if he were going to continue to be a pubic face for the dissident right, naturally the people have the right to know Milo's (who is half Jewish) position on the issue. Upon challenging Milo to a debate on the Noahide Laws I was banned from texting in the group and his admin gave the reasons why. He said my "Noahide concern" was a "troll" and that discussion of the Noahide Laws was not acceptable for the group or "or elsewhere". Milo must have read my challenge to him on the Noahide Law as he responded and told me I was less interesting than his husband's cock.
Milo is half-Jewish, but he presumes to speak for the dissident right, yet it seems he and his people are Noahide compliant. Noahide Law is such an explosive issue that it necessarily demands a response, similar to one needing to make clear their position on certain criminal offenses. Why did Milo's admin call Noahidism a "troll" which has not place for discussion within or without of Milo's group? When Milo told me I was less interesting than his husband's cock, why did he take such a serious issue which could further ruin his reputation so lightly? It would take all of two seconds to make his position known on an issue such as Noahide Law which obviously divides the room. Is Milo Noahide compliant? Is he really a Jewish supremacist who wants to see non-Jews under the thumb of Noahidism? Is Milo simply here to dupe the non-Jews? We must push Milo to state his position on the Noahide Laws if he is going to continue to be patroned by the dissident right.
UPDATE:
I have been expelled permanently from Milo's group chat on Telegram Messenger and one of the reasons was because of my "Noahide monomania", so they are Noahide compliant, time to expose Milo and his team.
Tuesday, October 8, 2019
Kol Nidre is the Jewish doctrine of deception and is similar to Islamic Taqqiya
I. Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name”
Throughout the Talmud, the term “Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name” comes up very often, especially when Jews are speaking about perhaps not being 100% honest with non-Jews. The 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia gives us half the story on “desecration of the name”; they say the phrase means Jews are not to do anything that will bring discredit to the Jewish Religion. However we will show below that this phrase often means you can do almost anything you want to non-Jews, just so long as you do not get caught!
“Terms denoting the highest positive and negative standards of Jewish ethics, the one indicating that everything within man’s power should be done to glorify the name of God before the world, the other that everything should be avoided which may reflect discredit upon the religion of Israel and thereby desecrate the name of God” -“Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name”, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
II. Lie to win legal cases against Gentiles
According to the Talmud, in Baba Kamma 113b, Jews can deceive non-Jews to gain the upper hand in legal matters. The only time there is a prohibition against lying is if there is danger the non-Jew will discover the lie (“sanctification of the name”).
“Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former according to the laws of Israel, justify him and say: ‘This is our law;’ so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens, justify him and say to the other party: ‘This is your law;’ but if this cannot be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent him.”… “but were there no infringement of the sanctification of the Name, we could circumvent him!” – 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Baba Kamma 113b
III. The Kol Nidre – Jewish Doctrine of Deception
“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘ḳonam,’ ‘ḳonas,’ or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.” – Sung by World Jewry every year on Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement)
In regards to lying to non-Jews, Jews are given a provision to break vows or make false vows via a proxy called “Kol Nidre” found in the Talmudic book of Nedarim 23a and further elaborated in 23b and 24a. Let’s investigate these Talmudic passages so that we can easily refute the possible lies about Kol Nidre heaped upon non-Jews today.
Nedarim 23a
1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud
1. Kol Nidre involves vows made to people, NOT GOD
Notice here that the Talmudic folio is speaking about being absolved for making vows one could not keep to other people (NOT GOD). This is very important to note because Jews often try to assert that the Kol Nidre is only meant to absolve Jews for broken promises they have made to their god and not to other people. The example cited here is very innocuous, it simply explains that Jews are not responsible for oaths they broke for reasons not under their personal control, such as one’s wife or daughter not following instructions. However, the example does show we are talking about vows made to people and not god as many Jews try to assert. In fact, the entire book of Nedarim is about vows, Nedarim means “vows” and the Kol Nidre literally means “all vows”, not just vows to god.
Abaye’s wife had a daughter. He declared, ‘[She must marry] one of my relations,’ and she maintained, ‘one of mine’. So he said to her: ‘[All] benefit from me be forbidden to you if you disregard my wish and marry her to one of your relations.’ She went, ignored his desire, and married her to her relation. [Subsequently Abaye] went before R. Joseph [for absolution], who asked him: ‘Had you known that she would disregard your wish and marry her to her relation, would you have vowed?’ He answered, ‘No,’ and R. Joseph absolved him. But is such permitted?[6] — Yes, and it was taught: A man once imposed a vow on his wife not to make the festival pilgrimage [to Jerusalem]; but she disregarded his wish, and did go. He went to R. Jose [for absolution], who said to him, ‘Had you known that she would disregard your wish and make the journey, would you have imposed the vow on her?’ He answered, ‘No,’ and R. Jose absolved him. – 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 23a
Footnote 6: The vow itself providing cause for absolution.
2. Confusing language of the Kol Nidre
The next passage is hard to make sense of, but the Rabbis will admit that this was done on purpose. How fitting that the very passage which provides a possible dispensation of truth for Jews is purposely written in a manner to “confuse”. Yet, we do get the sense that the Rabbis are talking about making a vow one has made to a friend null because it was a vow of “incitement”, and in order for the vow to be officially absolved, the Jew breaking the vow would have to remember something at the time they made the vow. What all this means is explained in the next folio of the Talmud.
MISHNAH. R. ELIEZER B. JACOB SAID: ALSO HE[7] WHO WISHES TO SUBJECT HIS FRIEND TO A VOW TO EAT WITH HIM, SHOULD DECLARE: ‘EVERY VOW WHICH I MAY MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL‘. [HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,] PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW. - 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 23a
GEMARA. But since he says, ‘Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null,’ he will surely not listen to him[8] and not come to [eat with] him? —
Footnote 7: The friend.
Footnote 8: This too is an example of a vow of incitement, v. Gemara.
Nedarim 23b
1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud
3. The Kol Nidre Explained
The Rabbis tell us the text is “defective”. In the next passage we will see that this was done deliberately rather than by accident. But first they explain the meaning of the Kol Nidre to us. If one imposes a vow on one’s friend (a person, not god) to come to dinner and thus “incite” them to a vow they originally did not want to make, the friend is absolved when they breaking this vow… just so long as they remembered the text of the Kol Nidre which was stated in the previous folio. It would seem that this text would have been recited by the Jew at the beginning of the year for this very purpose, for nullifying his or her vows in advance. Indeed the Kol Nidre is refered to as as the “law of revocation in advance” and “a formula for the dispensation of vows” in footnote 1 to the same passage. As long as they remember the Kol Nidre at the time of making false vows, there is no obligation for a Jew to announce that their vow is false or will be unfulfilled. Footnote 1 also clarifies that the only stipulation given is that the Jew cannot personally benefit from breaking the vow.
The text is defective, and this is what was taught: He who desires his friend to eat with him, and after urging him, imposes a vow upon him, it is ‘a vow of incitement [and hence invalid]. And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, ‘Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null.[1] [HIS VOWS ARE THEN INVALID,] PROVIDING THAT HE REMEMBERS THIS AT THE TIME OF THE VOW. But if he remembers, he has cancelled the declaration and confirmed the vow?[2] — Abaye answered: Read: providing that it is not remembered at the time of the vow. Raba said, After all, it is as we said originally.[3] Here the circumstances are e.g., that one stipulated at the beginning of the year, but does not know in reference to what. Now he vows. Hence, if he remembers [the stipulation] and he declares: ‘I vow in accordance with my original intention’, his vow has no reality. But if he does not declare thus, he has cancelled his stipulation and confirmed his vow. – 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 23b
FOOTNOTES:
Footnote 1. This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran.). The context makes it perfectly obvious that only vows, where the maker abjures benefit from aught. or imposes an interdict of his own property upon his neighbour, are referred to. V. J.E. s.v. Kol Nidre. Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual is later than the Talmud, and, as seen from the following statement about R. Huna h. Hinena, the law of revocation in advance was not made public.
Footnote 2. Since, when vowing. he knows of his previous declaration, he obviously disregards it. as otherwise he would not vow at all.
Footnote 3. The received text is correct.
4. The Kol Nidre is Purposely Deceiving
From the final passage of Nedarim 23b and footnote 4 we learn that the text of the Kol Nidre was purposely obscured so that oaths would not be taken too lightly if the Kol Nidre were taught publicly, indeed the Jewish Encyclopedia will show that even Jews have found it hard to trust one another because of the Kol Nidre. So what does this purposefully confusing language mean? It means the the Rabbis knew exactly what the Kol Nidre does, it absolves Jews from making false vows under incitement, but they don’t want non-Jews or even too many Jews to know this, so they purposely obscured the text.
R. Huna b. Hinena wished to lecture thereon [sc. anticipatory cancellation] at the public session. But Raba remonstrated with him: The Tanna has intentionally obscured the law,[4] in order that vows should not be lightly treated, whilst you desire to teach it publicly!
The scholars propounded: Do the Rabbis disagree with R. Eliezer b. Jacob or not?[5] And should you say that they differ, is the halachah like him or not?[6] — Come and hear: For we learnt: If one says to his neighbour, - 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 23b
FOOTNOTES:
Footnote 4. By giving a defective text. This implies that here, at least, the lacuna is not accidental, due to faulty transmission, but deliberate; cf. p. 2, n. 3.
Footnote 5. But regard this as a binding vow.
Footnote 6. Since the Mishnah teaches it as an individual opinion.
Nedarim 24a
1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud
5. As long as the vow “Honors”
“everything should be avoided which may reflect discredit upon the religion of Israel and thereby desecrate the name of God” - “Sanctification” and “Desecration of the Name”, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
Technical details about the Kol Nidre extend on into the book of Nedarim, but we will finish for now at Nedarim 24a where again we are given examples of vows made to humans and not god. Here, Jews can absolve themselves of vows without the help of a sage or rabbi as long as they broke their vow to “honour me” [aka the Jewish god, the Jewish Religion, and the Jews]. We are also reminded that incitement automatically makes a vow invalid. Jews may have to hide the darker elements of their ideology (such as the Noahide Laws) and so often feel under “incitement” to lie or break a vow of truth in regards to their beliefs. So Jews can use Kol Nidre to prevent the “desecration of the name”, meaning they can break vows of honesty to non-Jews to keep them unaware of possible sinister intentions and devious undertakings.
‘Konam that I do not benefit from your if you do not accept for your son a kor of wheat and two barrels of wine,’ — his neighbour may annul his vow without [recourse to] a Sage, by saying: ‘Did you vow for any other purpose but to honour me? This [nonacceptance] is my honour.’ Thus, it is only because he asserts, ‘This is my honour’; but otherwise, it is [a binding] vow. Whose view is this? If R. Eliezer b. Jacob’s, — it is a vow of incitement?[1] Hence it must be the Rabbis,[2] thus proving that they disagree with R. Eliezer! — [No.] After all, it may be R. Eliezer b. Jacob’s view: he admits that this is a [real] vow, for he [who makes it] says [in effect], ‘I am not a dog, that I should benefit from you without your benefiting from me.’ – 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 24a
Footnote1: Which is invalid in any case.
Footnote 2: The text is thus emended by BaH.
REFUTING LIES ABOUT THE KOL NIDRE
IV. Refuting lies about the Kol Nidre
The Jewish Encyclopedia attempts to assert that the Kol Nidre proxy only applies to vows made to god and not vows made to other people, and that the proxy is only part of a prayer made once a year on Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) to absolve Jews of any vows they make that year to their god that they are unable to keep. This is an obvious lie and a use of Kol Nidre itself since according to footnote 1 in Nedarim 23b of the Talmud, the Kol Nidre is a legal proxy that exists outside of Yom Kippur and was not incorporated into the ritual of Yom Kippur until later, partially because the proxy was not made public. Kol Nidre is even referred to as “the law of revocation in advance” and “a formula for dispensation of vows”.
This may have provided a support for the custom of reciting Kol Nidre (a formula for dispensation of vows) prior to the Evening Service of the Day of Atonement (Ran.). The context makes it perfectly obvious that only vows, where the maker abjures benefit from aught. or imposes an interdict of his own property upon his neighbour, are referred to. V. J.E. s.v. Kol Nidre. Though the beginning of the year (New Year) is mentioned here, the Day of Atonement was probably chosen on account of its great solemnity. But Kol Nidre as part of the ritual is later than the Talmud, and, as seen from the following statement about R. Huna h. Hinena, the law of revocation in advance was not made public. – 1962 Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 23b, Footnote 1
As we showed in the Talmud, all the stipulations of the Kol Nidre proxy deal with breaking vows one makes to other people, and not to god. In addition, according to the proxy of the Kol Nidre, the Jew must only announce their vow as false if they do not remember the proxy of the Kol Nidre, which they had ritually stated at the beginning of the year, at the time they make the false vow. If the Jew remembers the Kol Nidre at the time they make the false vow then the Jew has no obligation to proclaim that their vow is false. Who would willingly try to deceive their omniscient god like this? Again, the most relevant application of Kol Nidre for Jews is to make false vows of truth so that they do not have to reveal the unsavory and outright dangerous elements of their ideology such as Noahide Law.
KOL NIDRE = All Vows
1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
1. Kol Nidre is not just a prayer
Under the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia article entry on the Kol Nidre, the Jews try to make the Kol Nidre seem like a simple “prayer” said on the “Day of Atonement”, also known as Yom Kippur. However, we are told this simple “prayer” has had an eventful history and has even had an influence over the legal status of Jews in non-Jewish nations. Indeed, in the past, non-Jews have become aware of the Kol Nidre and have made legislation to protect themselves against it: “Jew Oaths”. Yes, indeed we are told that “Christians” have employed the Kol Nidre to assert that Jews cannot be trusted.
Prayer recited in the synagogue at the beginning of the evening service on the Day of Atonement; the name is taken from the opening words. The “Kol Nidre” has had a very eventful history, both in itself and in its influence on the legal status of the Jews. Introduced into the liturgy despite the opposition of rabbinic authorities, repeatedly attacked in the course of time by many halakists, and in the nineteenth century expunged from the prayer-book by many communities of western Europe, it has often been employed by Christians to support their assertion that the oath of a Jew can not be trusted. – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
2. Kol Nidre is recited every year at Yom Kippur
Before continuing, take a moment to read the Kol Nidre as spoken by Jews once a year on Yom Kippur and see how detailed and literal a statement it is. The proxy states that “all vows” are absolved and annulled in advance; all vows, not just vows made to god:
“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘ḳonam,’ ‘ḳonas,’ or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.” – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
3. Kol Nidre applies to humans, NOT GOD
The Jewish Encyclopedia attempts to state that the Kol Nidre is only to avoid heavenly judgment, meaning that the Kol Nidre only refers to vows made to god and not people or other institutions; we have already shown from the Talmud this is not true.
The teachers of the synagogues, however, have never failed to point out to their cobelievers that the dispensation from vows in the “Kol Nidre” refers only to those which an individual voluntarily assumes for himself alone (see RoSH to Ned. 23b) and in which no other persons or their interests are involved. In other words, the formula is restricted to those vows which concern only the relation of man to his conscience or to his Heavenly Judge (see especially Tos. to Ned. 23b). In the opinion of Jewish teachers, therefore, the object of the “Kol Nidre” in declaring oaths null and void is to give protection from divine punishment in case of violation of the vow. – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
…At other times and places during the nineteenth century emphasis was frequently laid upon the fact that “in the ‘Kol Nidre’ only those vows and obligations are implied which are voluntarily assumed, and which are, so to speak, taken before God, thus being exclusively religious in content; but that those obligations are in no wise included which refer to other persons or to non-religious relations” (“Allg. Zeit. des Jud.” 1885, p. 396). – KOL NIDRE, Jewish Encyclopedia
The Jewish Encyclopedia again attempts to state that the Kol Nidre does not apply to vows made to any person, court of justice or community. However, in the same paragraph, they admit that many early Jewish authorities wanted the Kol Nidre to be used when it was “extorted from the congregation… in times of persecution”, and so you can see that the Jews can use Kol Nidre if they feel “persecuted”. Wouldn't revelations about the Noahide Laws lead non-Jews to become suspicious or angry... could Jews say this was "persecution"?
No vow, promise, or oath, however, which concerns another person, a court of justice, or a community is implied in the “Kol Nidre.” It must be remembered, moreover, that five geonim were against while only one was in favor of reciting the prayer (Zunz, “G. V.” p. 390, note a), and furthermore that even so early an authority as Saadia wished to restrict it to those vows which were extorted from the congregation in the synagogue in times of persecution (“Kol Bo,” l.c.); and he declared explicitly that the “Kol Nidre” gave no absolution from oaths which an individual had taken during the year. – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
4. Even some Jews disapprove of the Kol Nidre
It would seem that for some time the Kol Nidre has even been disapproved of by many Jews. Karaites, a very small sect of Jews who do not follow Talmud but Torah only, are known to have protested the Kol Nidre’s power of dispensation. It was even disqualified by many scholars of the Babylonian academies. The moral effect of the Kol Nidre was so negative that many Jewish officials themselves felt that it made other Jews who took its advice to be untrustworthy.
The readiness with which vows were made and the facility with which they were annulled by the scribes gave the Karaites an opportunity to attack the Rabbinites, and forced the Geonim to minimize the power of dispensation. Yehudai Gaon of Sura (760), author of the “Halakot Pesuḳot,” went so far as to forbid any study whatsoever of Nedarim, the Talmudic treatise on oaths (Alfasi on Nedarim, end; L. Löw, l.c. p. 363).Thus the “Kol Nidre” was discredited in both of the Babylonian academies and was not accepted by them… For the same reason Jeroham ben Meshullam, who lived in Provence about the middle of the fourteenth century, inveighed against those fools who, trusting to the “Kol Nidre,” made vows recklessly, and he declared them incapable of giving testimony (“Toledot Adam we-Ḥawwah,” ed. 1808, section 14, part iii., p. 88; see Zunz, “G. V.” p. 390). The Karaite Judah Hadassi, who wrote the “Eshkol ha-Kofer” at Constantinople in 1148 (see Nos. 139,140 of that work), likewise protested against the “Kol Nidre.”… Judah ben Barzillai, a Spanish author of the twelfth century, in his halakic work “Sefer ha-’Ittim,” declares that the custom of reciting the “Kol Nidre” was unjustifiable and misleading, since many ignorant persons believe that all their vows and oaths are annulled through this formula, and consequently they take such obligations on themselves carelessly (“Orḥot Ḥayyim,” p. 106a). – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
5. The Kol Nidre is recited among non-Jews
Notice, however, even though Jews themselves were upset with having to deal the with the Kol Nidre, it is customary to recite the formula in the various lands of the Jewish dispersion, meaning it is customary to practice Kol Nidre in the presence of non-Jews.
According to Naṭronai, however, it was customary to recite the formula in various lands of the Jewish dispersion, and it is clear likewise from Amram’s “Siddur” (ii. 37a) that the usage was wide-spread as early as his time in Spain… From Germany (Ṭur Oraḥ Ḥayyim, § 619) this custom spread to southern France, Spain, Greece, and probably to northern France, and was in time generally adopted (Shulḥan ‘Aruk, Yoreh De’ah, 619, 1; Zunz, l.c. p. 96). – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
6. Kol Nidre and “Jew Oaths”
The Kol Nidre has inspired many legislatures and judges throughout history to consider it necessary to have special oaths just for Jews (“Jew Oaths”). The Jewish Encyclopedia would have us believe that all of the non-Jews and Jews throughout history who have taken issue with the Kol Nidre are simply misreading it and are projecting their own unscrupulous intention onto the text. The Kol Nidre text of the Talmud was purposely written to confuse and hide its truth, what does that tell you? We even see apostates from the Jewish Religion believe the cynical nature of the Kol Nidre is true enough to use it in their attacks against their former religion.
The “Kol Nidre” has been one of the means widely used by Jewish apostates and by enemies of the Jews to cast suspicion on the trustworthiness of an oath taken by a Jew (Wagenseil, “Tela Ignea, Disputatio R. Jechielis,” p. 23; Eisenmenger, “Entdecktes Judenthum,” vol. ii., ch. ix., pp. 489 et seq., Königsberg, 1711; Bodenschatz, “Kirchliche Verfassung der Heutigen Juden,” part ii., ch. v., § 10, Frankfort and Leipsic, 1748; Rohling, “Der Talmudjude,” pp. 80et seq., Münster, 1877); so that many legislators considered it necessary to have a special form of oath administered to Jews (“Jew’s oath”), and many judges refused to allow them to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this prayer (Zunz, “G. S.” ii. 244; comp. pp. 246, 251). As early as 1240 Jehiel of Paris was obliged to defend the “Kol Nidre” against these charges. It can not be denied that, according to the usual wording of the formula, an unscrupulous man might think that it offers a means of escape from the obligations and promises which he had assumed and made in regard to others. – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
7. Why still Kol Nidre today?
Finally, at the 1844 rabbinical conference held in Brunswick Germany, it was unanimously declared that the Kol Nidre was not essential and that members of the conference should try their best to abolish the proxy. Yet, there were of course many orthodox Rabbis who opposed this measure and the Kol Nidre didn’t die. Even though it has been opposed by both non-Jews and Jews and is obviously an suspect script, the Kol Nidre is still alive and well today, being sung every year on Yom Kippur in the many synagogues of world Jewry. The Explanation given by Jewry is that despite its even Jewish proclaimed moral reprehensibility, the melody which goes along with the Kol Nidre is just so appealing…
Yielding to the numerous accusations and complaints brought against the “Kol Nidre” in the course of centuries, the rabbinical conference held at Brunswick in 1844 decided unanimously that the formula was not essential, and that the members of the convention should exert their influence toward securing its speedy abolition(“Protocolle der Ersten Rabbiner Versammlung,” p. 41, Brunswick, 1844)… Naturally there were many Orthodox opponents of this innovation, among whom M. Lehmann, editor of the “Israelit,” was especially prominent (see ib. 1863, Nos. 25, 38). – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
The principal factor which preserved the great religious authority of the “Kol Nidre” well into the nineteenth century, and which continually raises up new defenders for it, is doubtless its plaintive and appealing melody, which made a deep impression even on Lenau (see his remarks in “Der Israelit,” 1864, No. 40, pp. 538 et seq.) and which was the favorite melody of Moltke, who had the violinist Joachim play it for him. – KOL NIDRE, 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Finally I am going to TRY to bring god to the sex industry
I've always wanted to work in the sex industry, not just because I love sex but because for me there is spiritual and civilizational importance attached. In higher ages everything is divine and so is sex, free love can be more easily expressed as it is healthy and pure during the golden age, only in the dark age does it become saturated with demonic expression as everything does. I am the type of person who has maintained a divine connection to sex and so for me it is almost like a form of worship, I even worship the god of sex, desire and lust (Kama Deva) above all other gods.
I am finally about the embark on my first attempt at making it in the sex industry and all of a sudden my life is coming crashing down. This has all been nothing but theoretical up until this point but now reality is setting in and I am having an existential crisis. This industry in these evil times is so dangerous, what I am doing is putting me in a precarious position, I don't know but there could be legal difficulties as all sex industrialists need lawyers constantly. The industry is also run by a heartless mafia of demonic men as scriptures teach that during the Kali Yuga wicked men rule the minds of all with sex.
My main reason for getting involved in this is to break the monopoly of demon men over the sex industry and begin to wield it for higher societal purposes such as was done in ancient pagan Babylon where sex was sacred and part of the state instituted religion of Ishtar worship. Sacred harems abounded and these sex priestesses were even called upon for becoming the vessels for sex with gods (Hieros Gamos) and to bear children for kings. But my mind is twisted because I fear that it is the dark age and this industry is too profane and populated by the wrong people... I already feel like I could not do this as I would be sucked into a dark world which I would not be able to handle: drugs, STDs, mafias, social exclusions, what type of negative personalities I would encounter, legal issues and so forth.
But it goes even deeper than this as all of a sudden I am wondering if anything I have ever wanted is even truly related to god or am I misled and delusional, taken advantage of my malefic spiritual forces? I have always had to fight against the West's ingrained Biblical morals and its intense demonization of sex and especially sacred prostitution as this is actually a ritual to pagan gods. The Abrahamic religions wiped out the sex worshipping pagans globally and have taught the world why perhaps they reject and hate this form of human expression, they say it weakens and deludes the people and makes them ripe for conquest and slavery, while the vigorous sexual restraint of the Christians allows them to channel their libido, they too see sex as a divine institution and just as they believe in only one god they demand one only have sex with one person (or one's official wives) and that to express it outside of marital bondage is a sin and a disease. Did the sacred prostituted fall because it is the dark age, or were they destined for damnation, and if they could not withstand the onslaught of the modern world how could I do this alone?
Now that the gods have granted the opportunity to go out and do what I have always wanted to do, all of a sudden I am questioning whether or not my passions are even holy at all, or am I being draught into demonism by malevolent forces? Will going forth and trying to satiate my perceived needs while also bringing a revolution to the sex industry, will this destroy me? And what if I see on my first go that none of this is for me and I have been wrong the whole time... this form of god is my life... what would I do after this... I would be finished. What do I do then, live in horror that I was created to go down a wrong path and I should either accept my fate or convert to the Abrahamic faith? I can't do that, I think I would go insane. What I am about to do comes with a slight chance of being arrested, to be struck like that in the midst of worshipping god in his temple would destroy my faith I think, I can't deal with any more betrayal from the universe.
I don't know what is about to happen to me, but it is either going to be very good or horrible. I don't want to be in this position, I will admit I am very unhappy and the opportunity to find out has made me only all the more unhappy. Even if it does work will it make me happy and could I feel like a ghost, hollowed out by going too far down the wrong road, desperate to escape but no way out? Or have I been poisoned by the Abrahamics, is my quest divine, will going forth with this make me happy... is it the demons that are making me doubt myself? Why do I have to be in this position, is it the dark age or is it my tormented soul? Either way I think that after next week I will be writing as a different person, something is going to change drastically, I just can't predict what that will be.
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Gay genetic engineers won't be the "Anti-Christ", they will be his enemy
There is a plot afoot on the part of Christians to scapegoat homosexuals and transhumanism as the sign of the coming of the "Antichrist", where does this conspiracy come from, and are Christians genuine when they speak of it? The claim that the Antichrist will be a homosexual comes from the book of Daniel which says he will not regard the desires of women, implying to some that he will either be a homosexual or celibate, however, according to this conspiracy theory it could also be that he is not exactly human as we will soon see. It also says he will hold himself above all, an apparent arrogant pagan homosexual.
Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all. - Daniel 11:37, King James Bible
Where do Christians get the idea the Antichrist government will engage in transhumanism and genetic engineering of the human race? Some Christians take a scripture from Mark to back up this theory, the scripture says that if the god of Israel does not shorten the days of the Antichrist government, no "flesh" would be saved, rather than saying no humans will be saved, why do they translate this as transhumanism? The Bible in Luke also states that during the times of the Antichrist the earth will re-experience the times of Noah when fallen angels mated with human women to produce a hybrid race of giants, the implication is that during the time of the Antichrist demons will once again breed with humans and produce a new unnatural race, and some Christians believe this is being facilitated by genetic engineering because these fallen angels did not only breed with the daughters of men but also taught humans many advanced sciences and crafts which they are supposedly doing again now with the rapid advancement of the biological and cybernetic sciences.
And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days. - Mark 13:20
And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. - Luke 17:26, King James Bible
Some Christians believe the Antichrist will be equipped with body modifications and technology, he will have the power to make great signs and wonders, he will be able to command fire from the sky. It is also said that he is an "image of the beast", the beast is the current system of humans, he will look like a human but will not be a human but a genetically engineered semi-cyborg, he will deceive the earth into believing he is real flesh, but he is not.
And it works great signs, so that it should even cause fire out of heaven to come down to the earth in the presence of men. And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. - Revelation 13:13-14
Now that we can see how some Christians came to their modern prophecies, let's ask ourselves are Christians being genuine about their fears of gay genetic engineers or is this a cleverly disguised deception? Christian prophecy depends on the rise of the Antichrist and so Christians would be very hesitant to lengthen the hour in which this Antichrist arrives, Evangelical Christians are desperate to once again oppress pagan homosexuals, and by doing this they would certainly be hindering the coming of the Apocalypse which they await anxiously. Let's look at this another way, transhumanism is also part of the current thinking on the Antichrist, so why don't Christians focus on this more, or at least attempt to halt it as much as they try to eradicate homosexuality? There is a quote in the book of Revelations which says that the Antichrist will make all humans take a mark on their forehead or on their forearm if they want to buy, sell and survive; many modern Christians claim this mark is an RFID chip which will be implanted in all of the people of the earth and without this we will be unable to make a living. Why aren't Christians as vocal about these modern technologies as they are about their disdain for homosexuals? What about all the other sins of the Bible, adultery, and fornications, why don't Christians focus more on that?
It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. - Revelations 13:16-17
To most Christians the Bible states where this Antichrist will arrive and from where he will rule, it is said he will be an abomination in a holy place, this is typically said to mean he will take over the newly rebuilt Temple Mount in Jerusalem, but why would a pagan homosexual transhumanist choose the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem from which to rule? Isn't the coming Jewish messiah supposed to rule from the seat? Christians try to state that the Antichrist will set up idol worship in the Temple at Jerusalem just as the Greeks did, but to explain this away they hypocritically recall prophecies which have already taken place, in the book of Daniel 9:26 it is said that one coming likely from Rome will destroy Jerusalem and the Temple, but the sacking of Jerusalem by Rome already took place and the destruction of the Temple Mount would prohibit the Antichrist from taking his seat in the Temple, where the Jewish Messiah is supposed to sit... it just does not make sense.
So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomination that causes desolation,' spoken of through the prophet Daniel--let the reader understand-then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. - Mathew 24: 15-16
The Christians do not want secular affairs to inhibit the coming of the Antichrist because they would all love to see the arrival of the Apocolypse in their time, they are waiting for it, are the Christians playing bait-and-switch, are they scapegoating the homosexuals and the transhumanists so as to take eyes off the true coming Antichrist so as to make him invisible and thus ease his passage? What is an Antichrist? An Antichrist is someone who is anti-Jesus; while pagans tend to be anti-Christians there is only one religion on earth which is statedly in scripture to be against Jesus and that is Talmudic Judaism. The Jewish Talmud states that Jesus is a sorcerer and blasphemer and that he perverted the Torah of Moses, blasphemy against Jesus is written down in Judaism's highest holy book, even Islam does not speak of Jesus this way, Judaism is the only truly Antichrist religion on earth. Is there any evidence the Antichrist could be the Jewish messiah of which Israel awaits?
Before we can answer this question we need to learn a little about the interaction between Jews and Christians. Like all religions, Judaism has many sects and schisms, many of which are all but extinct. One sect which was once the only sect were the Sadducees, the Sadducees strictly followed the written Torah and only worked their priestcraft through the grand Temple Mount, however another more populist form of Judaism arose called Pharisaism which had come up with new traditions and who had Rabbis who taught in public synagogues. During the times of Jesus the Sadducees and Pharisees were at great odds with one another, and in the book of Mathew Jesus makes it clear who he is against, the Pharisees which he calls sons of devils and hypocrites. The Pharisees eventually won out and the Sadducees disappeared, but the Pharisees never forgot how Jesus rebuked them, and that is how anti-Christianity became encoded in the highest authority of modern-day Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud, which is the tradition of the Pharisees which Jesus rebuked. It is important to note Jesus also accuses the Pharisees of murdering the prophets, an accusation we are about to hear again.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Matthew 23:27-33.
Could modern-day Pharisee Jews and the Talmud have anything to do with the Antichrist? In the book of Revelation is says that Christians will be beheaded by the Antichrist government for their testament to Jesus, while many modern Christian state that this beheading is coming on the part of a pagan homosexual transhumanist Anti-Christ, the book of Revelations makes it clear that this involves the Pharisee Jews, we can tell the scripture is talking about the Pharisees because it calls them the "synagogue of Satan, those who say they are Jews but who are not Jews", this is in reference to the fact that Jesus and Christians reject the Pharisaic and Talmudic interpretation of the Torah and thus consider modern-day Jews to be fake Jews, Jews who say they are Jews but who are not Jews. Revelations hints to the fact that it is these Pharisees who will be carrying out the beheadings, not a pagan homosexual because it says the Jews will go to the feet of the Christians and proclaim that they are loved, repenting for their persecution of the Christians.
I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. - Revelations 20:4
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer . . . be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. . . . Revelation 2:9-10
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. Revelations 3:9
The Christian are well aware of the fact that the eventual Antichrist will not be a pagan transhumanist homosexual but the coming foretold Jewish messiah. What most people don't know is that the Jewish messiah will not only be the messiah for the Jews but the messiah for the whole world, and he will bring the world under Jewish law. Under Jewish law Christianity is usually considered to be blasphemy and idolatry, and the penalty for being a Christian is death by beheading, the very form of capital punishment the book of Revelations says the Antichrist will carry out from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Isn't it curious that the Bible says the Antichrist's number is 666, and the Jewish star has 6 points, 6 triangles, and a 6 sided hexagon in the middle, 6 points, plus 6 triangles, plus six sides equals 666!
The Christians are playing twisted games, they knew if too many people knew the Antichrist was not homosexual but Jewish that the people would rebel against Zionism and this would finish their prophecies, and so they are pinning everything on pagan homosexuals and scientists whom they always persecute anyway. This anti-homosexual and anti-science propaganda has reached such epic proportions that now Christians are leaving behind the Bible and are turning to science fiction to further whip up fear and hatred of both gays and science. Some theologians subscribe to the lost civilization of Atlantis; on this island nation it is said that some of the men began to practice dark arts such as genetically engineering human-animal crossbreeds for sex magic, it is implied they are homosexuals, they were called Black Wizards. Remember the Nephalim, the giants created by the crossing of the fallen angels with humans, many Christians propagate myths that the reincarnated souls of these homosexual transhumanists from Atlantis are now returning to aid the recreation of the giants of old through genetic engineering which will supposedly persecute the earth and especially the Christians. Some Christians also engage in alien conspiracies stating that grey aliens are hybridizing with humans to create a new race and this is somehow linked to the transsexual movement with trans persons being alien-human hybrids.
It is important to know that the coming Jewish messiah who will dominate the earth under Jewish law will also ban homosexuality and the crossbreeding of animals, hybridization is strictly prohibited under Jewish law, some say this is to avoid the practices of the homosexual genetic engineers of Atlantis. Why is the homosexual scientist the enemy of Judaism and Christianity? The Bible says the followers of the Antichrist will take a mark on the forehead or on the forearm, Jewish tefillin is religious garb which is worn on the forehead and on the forearm. Jewish law states that if a non-Jew wishes to show true devotion, and they are adhering to the Jewish laws of the Antichrist, they may wear tefillin to show their dedication... will the followers of the Jewish Antichrist wear tefillin on their forehead and forearms to take on his mark so that they may buy, sell and survive?
What does the tefillin mean? According to Rabbi Oury Cherki (here) tefillin replaced the mark on the head of pagan Egyptians to remind them of the calf and the snake, symbols of nature, to remind them that they are bound by the iron law of nature. The Jews replaced this with a box containing sacred writings, and the strap which holds it on their head is made from calf skin, to remind Jews they can rise above the calf, above the laws of nature. The Jews in a way admit their religion is almost unnatural or above nature. What would be their greatest competition? Homosexuals may not be outside the natural order, but they are outside the usual order, as are Jews, and so in a way they have a rare and what others perceive as an unnatural understanding of life. The homosexual's mentality coupled with genetic engineering is the greatest threat to the Antichrist who has risen above nature as well, not through science and homosexuality but through the religion of Judaism.
So why are the Christians doing this? The Christians know full well the Antichrist is Jewish and that the Antichrist himself will be both anti-homosexual and anti-science, especially against crossbreeding and transhumanism. The Christians don't want the population figuring out what is going on because then they would rebel and their prophecies would fail, so they have concocted this conspiracy to divert attention away from the coming Jewish messiah and place all the violence and hatred upon homosexuals and scientists, in fact, the Christians will likely team up with the Jewish messiah to wipe out homosexuals and transhumanists, doing this to fool the Christian laity into believing the Jewish messiah and the Christians are on the same side, but it is nothing but a macabre game on the part of the Christians to help set up the conditions for the incoming of the Jewish Antichrist, with homosexual transhumanists as the sacrifical lamb. The Christians cannot afford for the Jewish Antichrist to be thwarted, so they are stocking up hatred and fear against homosexuality and science so as to eventually bring on the genocide which will cleanse the way, but now we know their plans and can circumvent them. But as was stated homosexual transhumanists are likely the only class who can give the Jewish messiah a run for his money, the only people who are as far outside the natural order as he is, the homosexual genetic engineers will not be the Antichrist, they will be his defeat.
Monday, July 22, 2019
The homosexual's role in eugenics
It has become a stupid modern idea that homosexuals have no role to play in the reproduction of the human race, that we are merely uninvolved bystanders in the creation of life, or perhaps even its antagonist. For those who read and study Bible history, you will remember that the chief military and spiritual enemy of the Israelite Jews was the fertility cult of Ishtar. Ishtar was a warrior and sex deity who was the patron goddess of Babylon and her cults were found throughout the land of Canaan which according to the Bible was conquered under the biblical religion of the Old Testament. The Israelites were instructed to murder the priests of the pagan gods and religious scholars agree that these priesthoods were often accompanied by sodomites, indeed researcher believe that the pagans believed homosexuals and transexuals to have been created special by the god Ishtar herself to facilitate her worship in the land.
Ishtar was a fertility goddess, her sacred city of Babylon was known to be a city of religious harems where both heterosexual and homosexual sacred prostitution took place. These harem workers were not all considered whores but many of them held high status and were groomed to become the vessels from which kings and priests were born. The harem system became contrasted to the Jewish system where prostitution was completely banned and men took wives and slave women for themselves, often times kidnapping them from other tribes in their holy war of conquest over pagan lands. Religious Jews eventually established monogamy as the standard for marriage and this tradition was carried out almost strictly by the converted Europeans, this was accompanied by stringent strictures against homosexuality. Isthe allowance of homosexuality and the harem system linked?
If one thinks about it, if heterosexuality is enforced on a population and they are all expected to enter monogamous marriages, this would mean there would be roughly one female for every male with little excess of either sex, this system obviously blocks the growth of polygamy or any harem system of breeding as these require an excess of females for polygamous males or those who engage in harem visitation. If homosexuality is permitted and allowed to flourish, this takes men out of the breeding pool and so polygamy and the harem system of breeding becomes feasible. Does this have a eugenic or dysgenic effect on the population? Men are notoriously known for desiring many sexual partners and kings of men have always been known to practice polygamy and the keeping of harems more so than the commoners, this may have nothing to do with wealth but could go back to our ancient past where perhaps dominant males would take more females for themselves while less dominant males would only be able to capture one female or none. It would be assumed that the dominant males would be more capable, attractive, healthy and resourceful than the underlings and so he would carry better genes to carry into the future, he would also desire the most attractive, healthy and well-rounded females and so this again would increase the quality of the stock.
But the heterosexual polygamist would always be under threat from the men below him desiring more wives themselves or any wife at all. The polygamist males need allies and that is where the homosexual comes it. The homosexual plays a curious role in modern day society, on one hand, he is considered effeminate and cowardly, on the other hand, he is accused of facilitating the rise of secretive hyper-masculinist cults which hold a corner on the military and politics. The homosexual has long been discovered to usually go one way or the other, taking on the traits of a woman or of a super macho male. There are psychological elements that run through the psyche of the homosexual males but which have been poorly defined by outsiders because of the homosexual's distance from mainstream society and his taboo makes him hard to study as he feels restrained fully expressing himself and there is an aversion to hearing it, but what I am about to say would not be scoffed at by many homosexuals.
In the masculine homosexuals there is known to be a fondness for the military and politics, but usually more so in a servant role unless he is extremely dominant and then he rises to the very top of the profession. These masculine militant homosexuals are very patriotic and loyal. If he is intelligent the polygamous kings of greats among men could call upon these features among his masculine homosexuals to protect himself, the harem system and the state, not just from outsiders but from internal revolt as monogamous and unfortunate men would be envious. Then there is the feminine homosexual who takes much interest in the welfare of women and children and whom is known to be priest and teacher. These more feminine homosexuals would be able to aid in the care and socialization of the harem females and their beautification without the threat of them sleeping with these women and so they would be trusted by their heterosexual polygamous counterparts. In tandem, these polygamous kings and leaders along with this homosexual system could run open harems where monogamous men or men with no wives could obtain sexual gratification and comfort and thus lessen the threat of internal rebellion from this class. Indeed there is a breed of heterosexual man who prefers the company of harlots and the lack of commitment and to satiate him would not only raise his moral but also free up more females for the harems and polygamous marriages. Variation in human psychology would be aided by polytheist idolatry whereby cults would be used to sift breeders into psychological and physical types, another eugenic system the Judeo-Christain seek to destroy.
Now the homosexual would help the rise of several classes of females. There would be females who would be available for monogamous marriages for those men who desired it, there would be harem females which would either be held by one man or whom would be available to a clique or even the public, there would be polygamous wives, and there would be unmarried females among others which could be thought of. If the ruling heterosexual elite knew how to set it up, they could use their varying grades of homosexuals to run state affairs below them as guides and bureaucrats who could devise schemes to sift both males and females for their varying lifestyles, along as well as identifying calibers of homosexuals to work in compartmentalized functions. For example, it would be desired that the more capable males be facilitated in gaining polygamous marriages as this would proliferate his genes further in society, and so it could be advertised in the nation that noble females accept polygamy as a duty because it strengthens the race, calling upon her sense of duty. Now, of course, most females would probably not hear this call, but only the most race-conscious would and so this mindset would be siphoned into the ruling class. For men and women who prefer monogamy, then elaborate schemes of finding proper mates could be instituted to ensure the marriages were compatible and eugenically sound to produce strong middle-class families. Having a homosexual bent in society would help destroy the Judeo-Christain shame of harem work, women who desired to engage in sacred prostitution under a homosexual run harem could be socially protected so she could make a decision as the homosexual, unlike the jealous monogamist, would not engage in slut-shaming of her and indeed facilitate her transfer into the harem system, he would also give support to the advanced female who feels she could better serve society by being childless, and so woman's social tensions in society could be eased.
Now the homosexual's eugenic influence in conjunction with the polygamous and harem seeking men would go father than this. The homosexual is known for his focus on aesthetic and quality, his being judgemental and so he would help set the bar for which males and females would be desired for breeding. The biggest problem is unworthy males demanding mates which whom to breed even though this would reduce the quality of the population, less of a problem but still a problem are females of lowest caliber who also desire children. The best area to place this negative pressure is on those men who are not worthy of fatherhood yet who are too selfish to see this, he must not only be identified and subverted through social customs but encouraged to spend his time at the harems where he could lay with women who are on a form of contraception so as to lead him away from his cruel desires, the same could be accomplished with lower caliber females by either inducting them into the lesser brothels or providing them with incentives for birth control and abortion. While the polygamous and harem holding male can see the value in this, he may still feel empathy for his fellow man and break under pressure to provide them with the females they desire, and few monogamous men would entertain such a system as they would see it as a threat to themselves, and so a homosexual administration over these affairs would be best where homosexual men could classifying the population as such, and because he is an outsider without closeness to the subjects he could better carry out his duty without emotional angst.
However, the homosexual should have his own agenda which would no doubt be approved of by the superior classes of society though always misunderstood by the ignorant classes who also oppose the polygamous and the harem holder. The homosexual has his own desire for more homosexuals, especially intelligent attractive ones, and so he is committed to ensuring the most brilliant and sexually desirable of the heterosexual breed together. However, the homosexual is not without reproductive vigor and so with a surplus of females in the harem system, he can also breed himself to acquire the children he also desires. There is a theory that homosexual males are produced from women who have great desire for men, sluts if you will, that humans are either more attracted to men or women, and this desire is passed on, so the extremely sexed woman who craves men constantly would also produce men who desire men, while women of low male sex desire who mated with a man of high desire of sex with women would produce lesbians, it's a theory. If this theory holds fast then there would be a positive feedback loop which would benefit both homosexuals and heterosexual alike, through the harem system homosexual men would breed with women who are known to be especially promiscuous, and with this combined desire for men, the women born of such union would also make best harem maids while the males born would more likely be homosexuals who would not interfere in the harem/polygamous system and who would only be another soldier for the polygamous class, unless of course the rulers are homosexuals themselves, which is also possible. Hypersexual females could be placed on birth control so that they lay with as many men as possible to satiate their desire for women, break their craving for marriage, and keep them sterile, unless a eugenic child is craved from the union. This process of sterilizing men via a harem system and birth control would not apply to monogamous men who have past the test of society and are able to find eligible monogamous females for themselves, but these marriages should be aided by mate selection programs administered by homosexuals who would be objective, always seeking the birth of the best heterosexuals homosexuals out the union, ones with beautiful bodies and minds as this is his predilection. The homosexual would also be interesting in the best of cultural grooming of men and women as he already is, as we now know through the science of epigenetics that the parents' upbringing and experiences affect the personality of the child, especially the mother. It would not be in the homosexual's interest to have women as nothing but enslaved overused breeding machines but to craft her into a higher being so as to produce a new race of god-children from which he himself will induct new homosexuals for his society.
Then there are the military cults and priesthoods to speak about. As was already discussed homosexual men have a tendency to go one way or the other, toward a hypermasculine militancy or toward more feminine arts like priestcraft and teaching. Why should the military and priesthoods be made of homosexuals? First, homosexuals don't have wives and children to take care of, unless they have bred trough the harem system and in that case, these children can be raised communally or by partners and the harem women who bore them, the homosexual is freer to dedicate all of his time toward the state for which his unique qualities are suited. In the military, the homosexual has the advantage in that he is less restraint and more impulsive than the heterosexual, he is more likely to throw himself totally in with reckless abandonment thus ending warfare much more quickly and hopefully reducing the loss of life, the homosexual also has more fear of growing old than the heterosexual as he places a high regard on sex, indeed the homosexual is more naturally suicidal and ready to end his life, and so his fear on the battlefield is dampened, he also wish to prove his masculinity above the heterosexual in general, or so it is rumored if this type of homosexual. The homosexual whether in the military or the priesthood which is described is far more likely to commit ritual suicide so as to not burden this class with old age or handicap, what is now considered his mental illness instead becomes useful and noble.
Now the homosexual more inclined toward intellectual pursuits, his mind is the one which goes further than the normal heterosexual would care to ponder and to attempt new and intriguing ideas in science and religion. Most have heard of the legends of Atlantis, but there is one legend which strikes the homosexual as true. The Jewish Bible never explains why homosexuality is wrong, nor bestiality, and there is a very interesting prohibition against the crossbreeding of animals and plants. According to some theorists, on the island of Atlantis two classes of wizards arose, the White Wizards and the Black Wizards, while the White Wizards were said to follow natural law, the Black Wizards were homosexuals who genetically engineered humans and animals for unusual purpose including sex magic. Some believe this is why the Bible preaches against genetic engineering and homosexuality, to prevent the return of the Black Wizards of Atlantis (here). There is an interesting account in the Vedas where godless sorcerers (scientists) engineering a young beautiful female to enter the court of the Aryans with the purpose of seducing them, presumably for gaining their genetic material for eugenic and magical purposes, perhaps a remnant of the homosexual sorcerers of Atlantis engaged in eugenic conspiracy. It is interesting to note that in the Vedas some godless sorcerers eventually find a way to reconcile their scientism with the mythology of the Vedas by calling the Vedic gods to come down and watch over their sorcery as to learn from it (here). Some now believe that the half-animal gods like Ganesh and other mutations of humans were actually genetic engineering, the integration of this sorcery into mainstream society, the same would go for all pagan mythology of godmen, demons, hybrids and creatures. Unlike the Jews, the pagans inducted these homosexual sorcerers into their religions, along with their desires for genetic engineering. Thus unlike the heterosexual, the homosexual may be more likely to produce Black scientific priesthoods and produce humans and creatures which may not occur naturally but which bring special gifts to society. Indeed such homosexuals could be sought out and inducted into different priestcrafts for different purposes, not all necessarily practicing darker arts, any sort of social structure could be maintained by them, and their childlessness or communal child-rearing would aid this process. It is very interesting to note that many believe the supposedly coming anti-Christ of the Bible will be a homosexual male who has his followers engage in genetic engineering, a return of the Black sorcerers of Atlantis, a homosexual transhumanizing priesthood may be the very system which the Bible is attempting to thwart, a sign that it is desirable to the anti-Christian pagan.
There is also the possibility of much more complex racial intrigue. Studies have shown that homosexuals are more likely to find partners outside of their race, while at the same time many have detected in the other half a more extreme version of racism, again the homosexual always going in two directions. Racist homosexuals would be best suited for breeding and maintaining local societies, while interracial homosexuals could help either ease or precipitate war, whichever was needed at the time. Risen above the frey of his race the homosexual would concern himslef with three main things, producing men of pure breed, men of hybrids, and then creating a cult of sexualization between and among them. The homosexual must be allowed to engage in his natural insitict of sexualized racial science, he wants many different kinds of men, the sameness or contrast of which excites him sexually, and so he wants to produce either homogenious or heterogenious populations, especially with races of distant lineage, engaging in fetishization with a tint of war; and the homosexual could do this safely because he is planning it, maintaining human lines and societies in racial cleanliness because these are the stocks from which he can create his hybrid races and sexual/military tensions, the creation of race science fetishes is endless among the homosexual. The homosexual is genereally outside the reporductive scheme unless he plans it, and so generally he would likely be more amicable to using extreme abortion and birth control propaganda on societies in order to lower or increase their birthrate, again depending on need and desire, and he could do this without impediment from the ignorant backward monogamous conservatives, who are also needed, but whose uncreative values must be kept in check. If need be he could promote homosexuality further to reduce birthrates, or restrain it for a different effect, it would even be investigated if social rejection of the homosexual is indeed the source of his creativity, and thus certain societies would even be encouraged to engage in homophobia. Again, the homosexuals perversely creative mind could be used to produce a new kind of racial interaction, and the homosexual would gain his own agenda in breeding, though unnaturally seperated from it, and heterosexual blood and genetic material could be spared dilution even if the homosexual had amicable interacial interactions. This power would naturally bring resentment of the homosexual, however he could subdue this by using his skills and ambitions to provide all sorts of comforts to the people in terms of biological material, for example he could promote sex selection to make a surplus of women so that every man may have a wife and the harem system still be maintained, anything is possible when you are divorced from the system.
How are we to return to the ancient times and the creation of a new time, with homosexual man in his place as a guide to the eugenic art? First, the homosexual men must group together for this endeavor, to make a pact to affect the biological destiny of the human race. He must then bond with the heterosexuals of his race who prefer polygamous and harem breeding systems and he must work with them to establish these systems immediately, that would mean working to legalize polygamy and prostitution, but not a low form of prostitution but religious prostitution for eugenic purpose; and for those who would abuse it the homosexual would use his known obsessive-compulsive nature to lessen their damage through free birth control and abortion services, or providing the best-sterilized prostitutes to drown out children born to petty prostitution and ill-fated marriages. To accomplish such tasks would need a dual minded race, those who could propagate pornography and prostitution to the lower classes of society while still preaching breeding and family values to the middle and upper classes, a tricky and cunning preisthood, such men cannot be found among heterosexuals but are unique to the homosexual class. The homosexual must use his polyglot mind to direct several strains of breeding in one society, or separate out societies by mating and racial system, there is nothing wrong with experimenting in pure monogamy, as long as it is confined to only certain societies and that the monogamous class does not rise up in Jihad against the eugenic system. And has already been stated the homosexual himself would also breed, but not after his predecessors had made sure he himself was wellborn, a specimen of man. This system will confuse and frighten the average heterosexual, seeing homosexuals pander racism and inter-racialism, love and war, maintaining their own mysterious breeding programs, but the truly superior specimens among them will hear the call of Babylon and even before, they will not see an anti-Christ but a messiah, and then the eugenic age can begin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)